We obtained excellent disease-free survival following limited resection with clear margins. Limited resection should be considered a treatment option for duodenal GIST.

Between February 1997 and December 2001, 311 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants (A-A LDLTs) were performed at the Asan Medical Center for patients above 20 years of age. Indications for A-A LDLT were: chronic hepatitis B (203), chronic hepatitis C (5), hepatocellular carcinoma (64), alcoholic cirrhosis (9), cryptogenic cirrhosis (4), secondary biliary cirrhosis (5), primary biliary cirrhosis (1), Wilson' s disease (2), autoimmune hepatitis (1), hepatic tuberculosis (1), cholangiocarcinoma (1), fulminant hepatic failure (14) and primary non-function of cadaveric liver graft (1). Of 311 A-A LDLTs, 36 were of medical high urgency, 20 were for acute and subacute hepatic failure, 15 were for hepato-renal syndrome and 1 was for primary non-function. Recipient age ranged from 27 to 64 years. Donor age ranged from 16 to 62 years. There was no donor mortality. Implanted liver grafts were categorized into seven types: 175 modified right lobe (MRL), 70 left lobe, 32 right lobe, 20 dual grafts, 10 left lobe plus caudate lobe, three extended right lobe and one posterior segment. In MRL, the tributaries of the middle hepatic vein were reconstructed by interpositioning a vein graft. Indication for dual graft implantation was the same as single graft A-A LDLT, and four of 20 were emergency cases. Of 20 dual grafts, 14 received two left lobes, four received a left lobe and a lateral segment, one received a right lobe and a left lobe and one received a lateral segment and a posterior segment. Graft volume ranged from 28% to 83% of the standard liver volume of the recipients. There were 33 (10.6%) in-hospital mortalities (< 4 months) among the 310 patients after 311 A-A LDLTs. Of the 36 patients receiving emergency transplants, 31 survived. These encouraging results justify the expansion of A-A LDLT in coping with increasing demands, even in urgent situations. We have aimed to introduce the establishment of the efficacy of A-A LDLT in various end-stage chronic and acute liver diseases, as well as new technical advances to overcome small graft-size syndrome by using dual-graft implantation and MRL, both of which were first developed in our department.

Major concerns about donor safety cause controversy and limit the use of living donor liver transplantation to overcome organ shortages. The Korean Organ Transplantation Registry established a nationwide organ transplantation registration system in 2014. We reviewed the prospectively collected data of all 832 living liver donors who underwent procedures between April 2014 and December 2015. We allocated the donors to a left lobe group (n = 59) and a right lobe group (n = 773) and analyzed the relations between graft types and remaining liver volumes and complications (graded using the Clavien 5-tier grading system). The median follow-up was 19 months (range, 10-31 months). During the study period, 553 men and 279 women donated livers, and there were no deaths after living liver donation. The overall, biliary, and major complication (grade ≥ III) rates were 9.3%, 1.7%, and 1.9%, respectively. The graft types and remaining liver volume were associated with significantly different overall, biliary, and major complication rates. Of the 16 patients with major complications, 9 (56.3%) involved biliary complications (2 biliary strictures [12.5%] and 7 bile leakages [43.8%]). Among the 832 donors, the mean aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels were 23.9 ± 8.1 IU/L, 20.9 ± 11.3 IU/L, and 0.8 ± 0.4 mg/dL, respectively, 6 months after liver donation. In conclusion, biliary complications were the most common types of major morbidity in living liver donors. Donor hepatectomy can be performed successfully with minimal and easily controlled complications. Our study shows that prospective, nationwide cohort data provide an important means of investigating the safety in living liver donation. Liver Transplantation 23 999-1006 2017 AASLD.

Right lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is often not attempted in donors with anomalous portal venous branching (APVB). The authors describe their experience with portal vein (PV) reconstruction in 17 cases of APVB in right lobe LDLT. From July 1997 to December 2001, 214 right liver LDLT were performed at the Asan Medical Center. Seventeen of the donors had APVB and successfully underwent right lobectomy. The APVB were type II (trifurcation) in nine cases, type III (independent posterior segmental branching from main PV trunk) in seven, and unclassified in one. All 17 donors and recipients are alive, with good liver function. In type II APVB, the donor PV branches were obtained with separate openings that were joined as a common orifice at the back table in two, with a discoid-patch single opening in four, and with one common opening in three. In type III APVB, the donor PV were divided with two openings in four and with a discoid-patch single opening in three. The discoid-patch defect in the remnant PV was repaired with a vein patchplasty in two donors and resected with end-to-end anastomosis in five. However, one donor developed portal vein thrombosis (PVT) that was managed successfully by re-exploration and insertion of a metallic vascular stent. Of the four type III APVB obtained with two separate PV openings, the first two liver grafts were each reconstructed as double PV anastomoses. One of them required re-exploration because of PVT. In the two succeeding cases, a Y-graft interposition technique using a cryopreserved cadaveric iliac vein or the recipient's own portal confluence was successfully applied. To minimize the risk of PVT in donors with APVB, discoid-patch excision followed by repair with vein patchplasty or segmental resection should be avoided. Individual division of the PV branches creating two separate openings instead is recommended. To decrease the recipient's risk of PVT, interposition Y-graft venous reconstruction at the back table is superior to double PV anastomoses.

No abstract