No abstract

Isoprene is the 2-methyl analog of 1,3-butadiene and is a possible human carcinogen (IARC Group 2B). We assessed isoprene exposure in the general US population by measuring its urinary metabolite, N-acetyl-S-(4-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-buten-1-yl)-L-cysteine (IPM3) in participants (≥3 year old) from the 2015−2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Spot urine samples were analyzed for IPM3 using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Exclusive tobacco smokers were distinguished from non-users using a combination of self-reporting and serum cotinine data. IPM3 was detected in 80.2% of samples. The median IPM3 level was higher for exclusive cigarette smokers (39.8 μg/g creatinine) than for non-users (3.05 μg/g creatinine). Sample weighted regression analysis, controlling for creatinine, sex, age, race, body mass index, and diet, showed that IPM3 was positively and significantly associated with serum cotinine. Smoking 1−10 cigarettes per day (CPD, 0.5 pack) was significantly associated with an IPM3 increase of 596% (p < .0001), and smoking >20 CPD (>1 pack) was significantly associated with an IPM3 increase of 1640% (p < .0001), controlling for confounding variables. Drinking beer/ale at median and 90th percentile levels (compared to zero consumption) was associated (p < 0.05) with 0 and 2.9% increase in IPM3 in non-users, respectively. We conclude that tobacco smoke is a major source of isoprene exposure in the US population. This study provides important public health biomonitoring data on isoprene exposure in the general US population.

Benzene is a known genotoxic carcinogen linked to many hematological abnormalities. S-phenylmercapturic acid (PHMA, N-Acetyl-S-(phenyl)-L-cysteine, CAS# 4775-80-8) is a urinary metabolite of benzene and is used as a biomarker to assess benzene exposure. Pre-S-phenylmercapturic acid (pre-PHMA) is a PHMA precursor that dehydrates to PHMA at acidic pH. Published analytical methods that measure urinary PHMA adjust urine samples to a wide range of pH values using several types of acid, potentially leading to highly variable results depending on the concentration of pre-PHMA in a sample. Information is lacking on the variation in sample preparation among laboratories regularly measuring PHMA and the effect of those differences on PHMA quantitation in human urine samples. To investigate the differences in PHMA quantitation, we conducted an inter-laboratory comparison that included the analysis of 50 anonymous human urine samples (25 self-identified smokers, 25 self-identified non-smokers), quality control samples, and commercially available reference samples in five laboratories using different analytical methods to determine which sample preparation methods are currently in use and compare PHMA results. Observed urinary PHMA concentrations were proportionally higher at lower pH and results for anonymous urine samples varied widely among the methods. The method with the neutral preparation pH yielded results about 60% lower than the method using the most acidic conditions. Samples spiked with PHMA showed little variation, suggesting that the variability in results in human urine samples across methods is driven by the acid-mediated conversion of pre-PHMA to PHMA.

Many enzymes are known to change conformations during their catalytic cycle, but the role of these protein motions is not well understood. Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is a small, flexible enzyme that is often used as a model system for understanding enzyme dynamics. Recently, native tryptophan fluorescence was used as a probe to study micro- to millisecond dynamics of DHFR. Yet, because DHFR has five native tryptophans, the origin of the observed conformational changes could not be assigned to a specific region within the enzyme. Here, we use DHFR mutants, each with a single tryptophan as a probe for temperature jump fluorescence spectroscopy, to further inform our understanding of DHFR dynamics. The equilibrium tryptophan fluorescence of the mutants shows that each tryptophan is in a different environment and that wild-type DHFR fluorescence is not a simple summation of all the individual tryptophan fluorescence signatures due to tryptophan–tryptophan interactions. Additionally, each mutant exhibits a two-phase relaxation profile corresponding to ligand association/dissociation convolved with associated conformational changes and a slow conformational change that is independent of ligand association and dissociation, similar to the wild-type enzyme. However, the relaxation rate of the slow phase depends on the location of the tryptophan within the enzyme, supporting the conclusion that the individual tryptophan fluorescence dynamics do not originate from a single collective motion, but instead report on local motions throughout the enzyme.