Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has recently been approved for hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer patients. The effects of palbociclib as a treatment for other malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are of great clinical interest and are under active investigation. Here, we report the effects and a novel mechanism of action of palbociclib in HCC. We found that palbociclib induced both autophagy and apoptosis in HCC cells through a mechanism involving 5′ AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation and protein phosphatase 5 (PP5) inhibition. Blockade of AMPK signals or ectopic expression of PP5 counteracted the effect of palbociclib, confirming the involvement of the PP5/AMPK axis in palbociclib‐mediated HCC cell death. However, CDK4/6 inhibition by lentivirus‐mediated shRNA expression did not reproduce the effect of palbociclib‐treated cells, suggesting that the anti‐HCC effect of palbociclib is independent of CDK4/6. Moreover, two other CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib and abemaciclib) had minimal effects on HCC cell viability and the PP5/AMPK axis. Palbociclib also demonstrated significant tumor‐suppressive activity in a HCC xenograft model, which was associated with upregulation of pAMPK and PP5 inhibition. Finally, we analyzed 153 HCC clinical samples and found that PP5 expression was highly tumor specific and was associated with poor clinical features. Taken together, we conclude that palbociclib exerted antitumor activity against HCC through the PP5/AMPK axis independent of CDK4/6. Our findings provide a novel mechanistic basis for palbociclib and reveal the therapeutic potential of targeting PP5/AMPK signaling with a PP5 inhibitor for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

No abstract

Previous researchers of impression management have focused on the tactics of supervisor-targeted ingratiation, self-promotion, and exemplification, and neglected those targeting coworkers. Thus, we focused on the supplication tactics that employees use toward coworkers. Data were collected from 238 supervisor–subordinate dyads working at technology companies in Taiwan. Results showed that the higher the self-efficacy, the less likely employees were to use supplication tactics. This negative relationship was also stronger when leader–member exchange (LMX) quality was high. However, when employees used supplication tactics, high LMX did not buffer supervisors' negative assessment of their organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Thus, employees' supplication tactics damaged supervisors' evaluation of their OCB. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.