Age appears to favorably influence the clinicopathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal cancer. As age increased, the characteristics of tumor stage at diagnosis, tumor differentiation, and mucin production improved.
The treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer is complicated. Concurrent chemoradiation can increase disease-free survival and overall survival by increasing complete resection rate of locally recurrent tumors and even complete response of the tumors. Ongoing treatment strategies aim to enhance response rates and to accurately assess the extent of local recurrent tumor response to concurrent chemoradiation.
Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a significant prognostic marker in resectable colorectal cancer; however, there are no equivalent findings for perforated colon cancer. Using our colorectal cancer database, we retrospectively analyzed the data from 1995 to 2015 to determine if preoperative NLR was associated with survival outcomes in patients with perforated colon cancer. Methods: One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize the difference between the higher- (>5) and lower- (≤5) NLR groups. Clinicopathological factors, long-term overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed and compared between the two groups. The main outcome measures were OS and DFS. Results: Before PSM, the higher-NLR group had significantly higher prevalence of leukocytosis (lower- vs. higher-NLR groups: 12 [12.9%] vs. 46 [59.7%], p<0.001), lower serum albumin levels (lower- vs. higher-NLR groups: 30 [32.3%] vs. 42 [54.5%], p=0.003), and higher emergent operation rate (lower- vs. higher-NLR groups: 5 [5.4%] vs. 20 [26.0%], p<0.001). After one-to-one PSM, the groups comprised 41 patients each; none of the parameters were significantly different. The mean follow-up period was 76.3 months. Five-year OS and DFS were not significantly different (OS: p=0.637; DFS: p=0.827) between the higher- and lower-NLR groups. Conclusion: NLR have limited predictive value for outcomes in patients with perforated colon cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.