Conclusions:Octogenarian heart transplant recipients have a higher risk of cancer and bone abnormalities compared to heart transplant recipients in their 60-70s. Despite their many medical problems, these patients are survivors for whom natural selection has been kind.Purpose: While race is a risk factor for poor long-term outcomes after heart transplantation, little data exists examining the impact of socioeconomic status. Methods and Materials: We linked data from the UNOS/SRTR 1995-2009 with 2000 US Census data. A previously validated measure of socioeconomic status (SES) was calculated using 8 census variables for each patient based on zip code and race. Patients were stratified into three groups: low SES (score -30 to -2.1, n ϭ 10,441), medium SES (score -2.14 to 5.5, nϭ20,874), and high SES (score 5.5 to 23.4, nϭ10,438). Outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Lower SES patients had poorer long-term survival on the waitlist (p ϭ 0.0014) and were less likely to receive a transplant (p Ͻ0.0001). Following transplantation, 30-day mortality was unaffected by SES, but 1-year mortality was higher in the lowSES group (odds ratio 1.14, 95%CI 1.05-1.24). Long-term survival was significantly decreased by lower SES (Figure, p Ͻ 0.0001). Patients in the low SES had a higher incidence of rejection (hazard ratio 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.2) and were more likely to be poorly compliant with medications (1.6, 1.3-1.9). In a Cox proportional hazard model, both low SES (hazard ratio 1.4, 95%CI 1.3-1.5) and mid SES (1.1, 1.0-1.2) were associated with decreased long-term survival after transplantation. Cause of graft failure did not differ significantly.Conclusions: While early mortality is not affected by SES, long-term mortality is significantly poorer among waitlisted and transplanted patients from disadvantaged backgrounds. Improvements in long-term post-transplant care among disadvantaged patients are essential to mitigating striking disparities in outcomes.Purpose: Provision of palliative and end-of-life care is of special importance for patients awaiting lung transplantation. However, lung transplant program practices may be at odds with palliative care principles. We examined perceived barriers to delivery of palliative care to lung transplant candidates and sought strategies to improve such care.
Methods and Materials:An anonymized e-mail questionnaire was sent to all members of the American College of Chest Physicians Transplant NetWork and of the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. It included demographic and practice-related questions, questions about barriers to palliative care of lung transplant candidates, availability of services and utility of strategies to improve palliative care. Transplant program practitioners were eligible for this study. Results: There were 158 eligible responses. Respondents were in practice 11.3 (Ϯ9) years. 70% were pulmonologists, 17% surgeons and 13% other care providers, including coordinators and nurse practitioners. Barriers that were considered at least moderate by Ͼ50% of respondents ...