Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome occurs when metastases from an unknown primary site spread to multiple organs. Occult breast cancer (OBC) is defined as a clinically recognizable metastatic carcinoma from an undetectable primary breast tumor. It accounts for 0.3–1% of all breast cancers, often presenting with lymph node, bone, and skin metastases. Clinical and radiological examinations represent the first steps in the diagnostic algorithm for CUP syndrome from OBC. However, histological and immunohistochemical analyses, multidisciplinary team evaluation, and a multidisciplinary therapy are essential in the diagnosis and treatment of CUP syndrome from OBC. We report the case of a 52-year-old woman who underwent the removal of a parietal skin lesion. The histological and immunohistochemical analyses suggested a breast cancer origin. Clinical assessment and laboratory and radiological examinations did not locate the primary tumor. Hormone therapy was offered to the patient; however, she refused it. After 28 months, the patient reported a right cervical lump, and a total-body positron emission tomography showed dissemination of the disease to the lymph nodes and bone. A CUP syndrome from OBC was diagnosed. A multimodality approach with radiotherapy and hormone and biological therapy was started. At present, 5 years from the first presentation, the patient is asymptomatic despite the disseminated disease.

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. The SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in ≤60% of cases. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (Z0011) comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+ demonstrated no significant statistical difference in relapse and overall survival rates among the two different groups. However, this study had some limitations: small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%). Given these considerations, the SINODAR-ONE study started in April 2015.Objectives: The aims are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse. Thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and loco-regional recurrence. Methods: Patients receive either mastectomy or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy. They all undergo SLNB and are randomly divided into two arms of treatment: standard (SLNB plus ALND) or experimental treatment (only SLNB). According to multidisciplinary evaluation, patients may undergo additional adjuvant radiotherapy, chemo- and/or hormonal therapy , or no further therapy. Eligibility criteria: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 macro-metastatic SLNs; no distant MTS; no neo-adjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC; signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; micro-metastic SLNs; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Statistical analysis: OS and DFS are calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Estimator and differences between arms are assessed with the log-rank test. Results: The enrollment of patients ended in April 2020 with a total of 889 cases (443: standard arm; 446: experimental arm). In June 2020, we conducted an ad interim analysis on 889 patients. We found the two groups homogeneous for epidemiologic characteristics (age and menopausal status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, pTNM, immunohistochemistry, histology, grading, vascular and lymphatic invasion), adjuvant therapies and surgery on T. In particular we have performed a 23,1% of mastectomies in the standard arm and 20,1% in the experimental arm. We found a median of 2 sentinel lymph nodes removed in both arms and 1 non-sentinel positive lymph node in the experimental arm, and only 3 micro-metastases (1 in the standard arm and 2 in the experimental arm). Conclusion: In sum, with a median follow-up of 30 months, there have been no axillary recurrence in both arms. In the standard arm we found 8 total events (2 deaths and 6 distant relapses) and in in the experimental arm 6 events (1 death and 5 distant relapses), with a projected 5-years cumulative incidence of 6,5% in standard arm and 4,85% in the experimental arm. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Chiara Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Arianna Rubino, Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes : A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-01.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose Accurate evaluation of breast cancer on bioptic samples is of fundamental importance to guide therapeutic decisions, especially in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting. We aimed to assess concordance for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), c-erbB2/HER2 and Ki-67. We also reviewed the current literature to evaluate our results in the context of the data available at present. Methods We included patients who underwent both biopsy and surgical resection for breast cancer at San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy, between January 2014 and December 2020. ER, PR, c-erbB2, and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry concordance between biopsy and surgical specimen was evaluated. ER was further analysed to include the recently defined ER-low-positive in our analysis. Results We evaluated 923 patients. Concordance between biopsy and surgical specimen for ER, ER-low-positive, PR, c-erbB2 and Ki-67 was, respectively, 97.83, 47.8, 94.26, 68 and 86.13%. Cohen’s κ for interobserver agreement was very good for ER and good for PR, c-erbB2 and Ki-67. Concordance was especially low (37%) in the c-erbB2 1 + category. Conclusion Oestrogen and progesterone receptor status can be safely assessed on preoperative samples. The results of this study advise caution in interpreting biopsy results regarding ER-low-positive, c-erbB2/HER and Ki-67 results due to a still suboptimal concordance. The low concordance for c-erbB2 1 + cases underlines the importance of further training in this area, in the light of the future therapeutic perspectives.

Introduction Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients with negative SLNs without jeopardizing survival or regional control. International guidelines keep recommending ALND in the presence of positive (+) SLNs. However SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in many cases (60%). Retrospective studies have also shown a low risk of locoregional relapse in patients with SLNs+ not receiving ALND.This latter finding was recently confirmed in a randomized trial comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. However the observation of both similar relapse rate and survival in the 2 arms and the conclusion of a non-inferiority of SLNB compared to ALND require cautiousness because of some study limitations: premature enrollment cessation due to death rate lower than expected, short follow-up (6 years), small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%) which irradiates the breast but also the I° axillary level, thereby contributing to the low rate of regional relapse in the SLNB arm due to lymph node sterilization. Consequently further randomized trials with more precise selection criteria based on homogeneous clinico-pathological features and with longer follow-up are needed to confirm that performing only SLNB does not affect survival or relapse risk in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. Materials and Methods Primary and secondary aims of the present 2-arm randomized trial are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse, respectively, thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Patients receive either conservative surgery or mastectomy and radiotherapy. They all undergo intraoperative SLNB and SLN evaluation, and are randomly assigned to either further dissection of level I-II axillary lymph nodes (standard ALND arm) or absence of any axillary surgery (experimental SLNB arm). According to International Guidelines post-surgery treatments. Eligibility criteria are: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 SLNs presenting macroMTS at intraoperative or definitive histological evaluation; no distant MTS; no neoadjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC, signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; presence of only microMTS in the SLN+; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. Follow-up controls foresee: clinical examination every 6 months for 5 years and yearly thereafter; annual mammography and breast echography; annual axillary echography for patients in the SLNB arm; additional laboratory and instrumental surveys in case of suspected onset of distant MTS. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and to locoregional (ipsilateral breast or axillary, internal mammary or sopraclaveolar lymph nodes) disease recurrence. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Federico Frusone, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-02.

Background A small proportion of patients with primary breast cancer who receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) will develop an ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR). In these patients, mastectomy is still considered the treatment of first choice, even if a second conservative surgical approach is technically feasible. The aims of our study are to analyze the characteristics of patients with IBCR after BCS, evaluate and compare the different treatment modalities (repeat BCS vs. mastectomy) in terms of patients and tumor characteristics, disease-free interval (DFI), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).MethodsOur prospectively maintained institutional database was queried, and 309 patients with IBCR after BCS who underwent either repeat BCS or mastectomy, between January 2008 and December 2018, were identified. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence was defined as a local tumor reappearance in the same breast or in the surgical scar. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, primary cancer treated with mastectomy, residual disease, controlateral recurrence, recurrent benign disease, only distant or axillary recurrence, IBCR not treated surgically, follow-up <24 months, and DFI <6 months.ResultsThe mean age of patients at primary breast cancer was 55.3 years. The majority of primary tumors were ductal (87.4%), luminal A-B (81.2%) breast cancers. After BCS, 222 (71.8%) patients underwent radiotherapy. Out of 309 patients with IBCR after BCS, 143 underwent repeat BCS and 166 underwent mastectomy. At multivariable analysis, young age, <65 years (59.6% vs. 37.1% if age ≥65 years, odds ratio (OR)=2.374, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.02-0.24, p= 0.018) and short DFI <24 months (15.7% vs. 10.5% if DFI ≥24 months, OR=2.705, 95%CI=0.02-0.17, p= 0.007) were found to significantly increase the probability to receive mastectomy for IBCR after BCS. After IBCR, DFS rate at 3-, 5-, and 10-years was 79.2%, 68.2%, 36.9%, and 77.2%, 65.9%, 55.3%, in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy, respectively (p = 0.842). Overall-survival rate at 3-, 5-, and 10-years was 95.4%, 91.4%, 68.5%, and 87.3%, 69.3%, 57.9%, in patients receiving repeat BCS or mastectomy, respectively (p = 0.018).ConclusionsThe best candidates for repeat BCS in the treatment of IBCR are patients ≥65 years with a DFI ≥24 months. Young patients (<65 years) with early onset of recurrence (DFI <24 months) have a high probability to receive mastectomy for the treatment of IBCR. Mastectomy does not improve survival in patients with IBCS after BCS. The information about the risk of poor long-term prognosis after mastectomy should be shared with the patient and a repeat BCS could be proposed. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Emilia Marrazzo, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Giuseppe Canavese, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Corrado Tinterri. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: Treatment and long-term oncological results at a high volume center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-16.

Totally implanted venous access ports (TIVAPs) have been established as effective and safe devices for oncologic patients. In breast cancer setting, the implant of the reservoir at mid-arm allows the absence of additional scars on the chest and the easier access to the port with significant cosmetic and psychological advantages. In the last decades, breast surgery has made great progresses to ameliorate the cosmetic results even in mastectomy techniques. In fact, many studies have demonstrated that negative body image perception affects physical and psychological wellbeing of survivors. Despite this evidence, limited importance is still reserved to TIVAPs placement site, which is traditionally the chest. It is not unusual to see patients after a nipple-sparing mastectomy with excellent cosmetic result who show a disfiguring scar on their upper chest due to TIVAP placement. We report the case of a young woman with BRCA2-related breast cancer who underwent bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and adjuvant chemotherapy. Her TIVAP was located at the mid-arm, which is still an uncommon site compared to the upper chest. An optimal cosmetic result was obtained both in breast reconstruction and in the arm site of port, with high-rate patient satisfaction. This case presentation aims to raise awareness towards women’s body image preservation, particularly in the choice of TIVAP placement: in most cases neckline and upper chest should be avoided for a better patient related outcome.