By performing a set of controlled experiments and field measurements, this study investigated ventilation conditions in chemical laboratories in universities, as well as the impact of various ventilation measures on air change rate (ACR). The controlled study was conducted in one research laboratory. On/off air-conditioning, a fume hood, local exhaust, and an open door were the test variables. The field study measured ACR in 24 chemical laboratories at two universities. Ventilation in each laboratory was assessed by estimating the ACR using CO 2 -decay approaches. Controlled study results indicate that air-conditioning and local exhaust did not significantly impact the ACR, whereas use of a chemical hood or open door significantly (p 5 0.05) increased the ACR by 4.6-and 3.2-fold, respectively. Field measurements indicate that the average ACR for laboratories with airconditioning and closed windows, air-conditioning with windows partially closed, and no air-conditioning with windows open and fans were 2.18, 10.1, and 23.8 (h À1 ), respectively. Overall, 38% of chemical laboratories measured in this study, especially those using airconditioning with closed windows ($100%), did not meet the Occupational Safety and Health Administration laboratory ventilation requirements of four air exchanges per hour. Opening windows, at least partially, improved the ACR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.