2009
DOI: 10.1177/1420326x08101725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Air Change Rates in Chemical Laboratories

Abstract: By performing a set of controlled experiments and field measurements, this study investigated ventilation conditions in chemical laboratories in universities, as well as the impact of various ventilation measures on air change rate (ACR). The controlled study was conducted in one research laboratory. On/off air-conditioning, a fume hood, local exhaust, and an open door were the test variables. The field study measured ACR in 24 chemical laboratories at two universities. Ventilation in each laboratory was asses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, chemical fume hoods should be utilized when conducting toxic experiments, in order to exhaust any generated toxic aerosols to the outdoors (Berkeley Lab, 2000;& Creighton University, n.d.). However, when the hoods are either not available or used improperly, the fumes can circulate in the lab and jeopardize the air quality (Berkeley Lab, 2000;& Chien, Chang, and Lo, 2009). Additionally, unsafe handling of the substances could also increase lab emissions (Reinhardt, Ashbrook, & Leonard, 1995).…”
Section: Adverse Impacts Of Improper Lab Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, chemical fume hoods should be utilized when conducting toxic experiments, in order to exhaust any generated toxic aerosols to the outdoors (Berkeley Lab, 2000;& Creighton University, n.d.). However, when the hoods are either not available or used improperly, the fumes can circulate in the lab and jeopardize the air quality (Berkeley Lab, 2000;& Chien, Chang, and Lo, 2009). Additionally, unsafe handling of the substances could also increase lab emissions (Reinhardt, Ashbrook, & Leonard, 1995).…”
Section: Adverse Impacts Of Improper Lab Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%