Background Closed tendinous mallet finger can be treated non-operatively by extension splinting of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) for 6 to 8 weeks. However, method of conservative treatment in detail differs among various reports, especially in type of orthosis, duration of full-time immobilization and additional night orthotic wear after full-time immobilization. In our institution, full-time Stack splint is applied with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) in extension for 12 weeks and night orthosis is worn for 4 weeks. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of tendinous mallet finger using our treatment protocol. Patients and Methods Between March 2007 and December 2017, patients with tendinous mallet finger who were managed conservatively according to our treatment protocol were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 100 patients (101 cases) were enrolled, including 77 males and 23 females. Extension lag was measured before, soon after treatment, and at the final follow-up. Flexion angle of DIP joint was measured at the final follow-up. Patients were clinically evaluated based on the Crawford classification scale and Abouna & Brown criteria. Results The mean age of patients was 40 years and the mean follow-up was 48 months. The mean extension lag was 28.3 degrees initially and 2.6 degrees at the final follow-up. (p-value < 0.001) Flexion angle at the final follow-up was 68.3 degrees. Based on the Crawford classification scale, 56 % of patients had excellent results, and 25 % of patients had good results. According to Abouna & Brown criteria, 78 % of patients had success results and 7.5 % of patients had improved results. Conclusions Wearing orthosis for up to 16 weeks (12 weeks full time and 4 weeks night orthosis) in the treatment of tendinous mallet finger injuries can achieve satisfying result.

No abstract

No abstract

Background Lospa posterior-stabilized (PS) Plus type is a modified version of Lospa PS, in which the polyethylene insert shape is modified to reinforce stability and prevent patella-post impingement compared to Lospa PS. However, studies comparing the clinical and radiographic results of the two designs have not been reported yet. This study aimed to compare the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the existing PS type and the modified Lospa PS Plus type. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 558 knees of 342 patients who underwent TKA using the Lospa PS or PS Plus types and were followed up for at least 2 years. Cases were divided into two groups according to the implant used: 212 cases in the PS group and 346 cases in the PS Plus group. For clinical outcome assessment, knee range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Knee Society Score (KSS) were recorded before surgery and at the 2-year follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated according to the American Knee Society method. The incidence of postoperative complications and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Results Both groups showed significant clinical improvement after surgery. The average KSS significantly improved from 53.4 points in the PS group and 52.3 points in the PS Plus group preoperatively to 91.3 points and 93.2 points after surgery, respectively ( p < 0.001). The average WOMAC score improved from 50.4 points in the PS group and 52.3 points in the PS Plus group before surgery to 15.6 points and 14.8 points after surgery, respectively ( p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in ROM, the alignment of the lower limbs, and the implant position after surgery. The complication rates were also similar between the groups ( p = 0.167). Conclusions The Lospa PS Plus model is a modified design that improves the post structure from the previous PS type. Compared to the PS type, the PS Plus type showed similar statistical results at 2-year follow-up and good clinical results. The short-term average survival rate was over 98%, showing promising results.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The rotational malalignment in proximal phalanx fracture is unacceptable. Authors attempted to describe clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as complications after open reduction and internal fixation with screw only or plate for phalangeal fractures accompanied by rotational malalignment. Methods: Authors conducted a retrospective review of 46 patients who had been treated between Jan. 2010 and Dec. 2016. The average follow-up period was 16.7 months. A total active motion (TAM), Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), and tip pinch power between thumb and fractured finger were measured at the final follow-up. Complications were investigated during the follow up. We assessed the amount of rotation by measuring angle between 3rd ray and fractured finger. The measurement was divided into two groups depending on rotation direction, divergent and convergent direction group. Results: Twenty-eight cases were fixed with mini LCP plate, 12 cases with lag screws, and rest 6 cases with combined. All patients showed solid bony union on radiographs on average follow-up of 68 days (range, 41–157 days). Average TAM of the injured finger was 244 degrees and average DASH score was 4.9 at the last follow-up. Tip pinch power was 3.2 kg, which was not significantly different from that of the contralateral side at 3.4 kg (p = 0.21). The preexisting rotational angle was significantly adjusted (overall, 11.1°). Depending on rotation direction, preoperative 21.7° to postoperative 12.1° in 27 patients of convergent group and preoperative −5.0° to postoperative 8.3° in 19 patients of divergent group were achieved. Conclusions: The rotation from proximal phalanx fractures could be corrected with anatomic reduction by open reduction. Our results showed that open reduction and rigid internal fixation after physical examination for acute proximal phalanx fractures accompanied by rotational malalignment could achieve good clinical results.

No abstract