Critical staffing shortages have compelled hospitals to allow healthcare workers (HCWs) with low-risk COVID-19 exposures to continue to work. We performed SARS-CoV-2 PCR surveillance of asymptomatic HCWs allowed to work with masks after a low-risk COVID-19 exposure. A total of 66 HCWs participated and 5 (7.6%) were found to be PCR positive. Asymptomatic HCWs with low-risk exposures may represent a significant transmission risk.
Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for >15% of hospital-acquired infections, resulting in increased length of stay and costs. Consequently, methods to improve indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) care and maintenance are warranted to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired CAUTIs. This study was a prospective quality improvement (QI) project to reduce CAUTIs using prepackaged cloths (ReadyCleanse by Medline Industries) and a simple, standardized cleaning process for care and maintenance of IUCs. Methods: This study is an ongoing QI project at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a 4-hospital system located north of Chicago, Illinois, with 750 beds and ∼64,000 annual admissions. The study consists of a 1.5-month staff training on proper product use (phase 1), followed by an intervention using the cloths for IUC care (phase 2). Each package contains 5 individual cloths corresponding to a simple, 5-step, cleansing protocol. IUC care and maintenance are performed twice daily on a routine basis and after each incontinent episode. Beginning July 2018, current practice (soap and wash cloth) was replaced with the ReadyCleanse cloths, and on August 1, 2018, data collection began. Adult patients admitted at all 4 NorthShore Hospitals with an IUC for >24 hours are enrolled in the study. From patient electronic health records, we collected patient demographics, reason for IUC insertion, days of catheter use, and development of CAUTI (according to the NHSN definition). During the intervention, observations of compliance and performance of catheter care were also performed. For the analysis described here, results for the first 14 months of the study were compared to CAUTI numbers from the 14-month period prior to the start of the study (February 2017–March 2018); the data presented represent ∼50% of the planned data collection. Results: As of September 30, 2019, 4,969 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study: 1,491 patients from hospital A, 1,451 from hospital B, 1,091 from hospital C, and 936 from hospital D. Patient demographics for the study cohort were 47% female, with a median age of 77 years and an average of 3.9 catheter days per patient. Systemwide, observational audits for compliance using the cloths averaged 95%. Upon completion of study month 14, 22 CAUTIs had been identified, compared to 26 CAUTIs for the comparison period, indicating a 15% reduction. Conclusion: Implementation of this simple, standardized alternative for IUC care is feasible on a large scale and may have potential for reducing CAUTI rates.Funding: Medline Industries supported this study.Disclosures: None
Background:Candida auris prevalence in Illinois, particularly in the metropolitan Chicago area, is high. The Illinois Department of Public Health recommends empiric contact precautions for patients with a tracheostomy or requiring mechanical ventilation from skilled nursing facilities (vSNFs) or long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) who are admitted to an acute-care hospital. Cases of C. auris infection and colonization are reportable to the Illinois Extensively Drug Resistant Organism Registry (XDRO Registry). NorthShore University HealthSystem (NSUHS) actively screens adult intensive care unit (ICU) admissions from LTACHs and vSNFs for CA. Methods: NSUHS is a 4-hospital system located north of Chicago with 750 beds, 4 ICUs and ∼64,000 annual admissions. Beginning in April 2019, a composite axilla–groin swab was collected from all ICU LTACH or vSNF admissions. Composite swabs are cultured on Inhibitory Mold Agar. In July 2019, an ICU clinical case of C. auris was identified from a ventilated patient admitted from an outside hospital prompting the expansion of screening to include acute-care hospital transfers. To evaluate the value of screening criteria, a medical record review and retrospective query of the XDRO Registry was performed for all screened patients. Because cocolonization with carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) has been reported, CPO status was also queried. Results: Between April 1 and October 31, 2019, 70 patients were screened. Two screened patients did not meet the screening criteria (Fig. 1). No patients, with the exception of the clinical case, were found to be colonized with CA. The XDRO Registry query identified no patients with C. auris. Of the 70 patients, 9 (13%) had a CPO. Of those screened, 14 (20%) had a tracheostomy and/or mechanical ventilation (Table 1). Conclusions: Querying the XDRO registry at admission in combination with a medical record review appears adequate to identify patients admitted to a NSUHS ICU with C. auris and CPOs. Targeting patients admitted with a tracheostomy and/or mechanical ventilation may further reduce the number of screening cultures performed.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections. Many patients at our institution with a CAUTI do not have signs or symptoms of infection and bacterial growth likely represents asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). As a result, we implemented a Modified Lab Workflow (MLW) focused on diagnostic stewardship to improve urine culture (UCx) reporting and prevent misclassification and unnecessary treatment of CAUTIs. Methods On Sep. 1, 2019, laboratory reporting of Foley UCx was modified according to the protocol in Figure 1. UCx results were divided into 3 groups: (1) no growth, (2) mixed bacterial flora (≥3 organisms) not consistent with infection or (3) growth of ≤2 organisms with at least 1 organism ≥105 cfu/ml per National Healthcare Safety Network (NSHN) CAUTI definition. Group 3 UCx were resulted with instructions to the clinician (see Figure 1.). When requested, group 3 results were reviewed by Infection Prevention and released with organism identification and antibiotic susceptibility if it met Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CAUTI criteria. Otherwise they were resulted as: “Bacterial growth indicative of contamination or colonization.” Figure 1. Modified Laboratory Workflow for Reporting Urine Cultures from Foley Catheters Results Between Sep. 1, 2019 to Mar. 1, 2020, a total of 134 UCx from catheterized patients were reviewed. Forty-two (31%) of UCx were from patients with a Foley in-situ ≥48 hours and processed through MLW; 92 UCx were from a Foley in place < 48 hours and excluded from the study. Of the 42 UCx processed via MLW, 16 (38%) were no growth and 7 (17%) had bacterial growth suggestive of contamination. For group 3, 19/42 (45%) had growth of significant bacteria but only 1(5%) met IDSA criteria for reporting. During the study, 6 additional CAUTIs were reported due to incorrect specimen labeling causing Foley urine specimens to subvert MLW. Conclusion During our study, we identified 1 CAUTI through apt MLW use. Seven total CAUTIs occurred (SIR=0.66); a majority due to incorrect UCx source labeling, resulting in missed MLW screening. Ten CAUTIs (SIR=0.97) were reported in the preceding 6 months. As part of a comprehensive CAUTI prevention program, a MLW can help reduce classification of ASB as a CAUTI. Education to providers on precise labeling of UCx source is a key component of a successful MLW. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
BackgroundA majority of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are caused by the use of urinary catheters (CAUTI). Finding of bacteriuria is common in catheterized patients and often leads to unnecessary antibiotic treatment, increased length of stay and additional healthcare costs. We implemented an innovative intervention to improve urine culture (UCx) orders and prevent overdiagnosis of CAUTIs.MethodsOrders for UCx in adult patients with short-term urinary catheters at NorthShore University HealthSystem, IL were reviewed daily for appropriateness based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines. Appropriate urine testing was defined as: (1) presence of fever ( >38°C) within past 48 hours, (2) new urinary complaints: flank or suprapubic pain/tenderness or dysuria, frequency, urgency or incontinence within 48 hours after catheter removal, and (3) no other reasonable explanation for fever. If UCx was deemed inappropriate, ordering provider was contacted to cancel the order. Chart review was performed at least 30-days post-discharge to determine whether patients developed recurrent UTI, sepsis, were readmitted or expired.ResultsBetween 1 January to 31 March 2019, 65 UCx were submitted. Sixty-four patients (98%) did not meet criteria for testing. Most common reasons for not meeting criteria were absence of fever (60%) and no localizing UTI signs or symptoms (57%). 35 (54%) UCx were canceled after discussion with ordering providers. 21/35 patients (60%) were treated with antibiotics. All 35 patients were discharged, with a majority going to a skilled nursing facility (34%) or home (31%). 4/35 (11%) had a subsequent positive UCx. Two patients developed symptomatic UTI (sUTI) during the index admission. Two patients developed sUTI within 30-days post-discharge; one patient was transitioned to hospice after completion of therapy. All 4 patients were treated for sUTI.ConclusionWe were able to safely discontinue UCx in 89% of patients. A majority of patients were already started on empiric treatment and development of subsequent sUTI was infrequent (11% of patients). Our findings suggest that discontinuation of inappropriately ordered UCx is safe with low risk for sepsis or mortality.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.