The newly proposed model for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma demonstrated a more balanced distribution of patients into four groups with better prognostic discrimination as compared with the IPI.

SMILE chemotherapy is an effective treatment for newly diagnosed stage IV, relapsed or refractory ENKL. Myelosuppression and infection during the treatment should be carefully managed.

PURPOSE Ibrutinib has shown activity in non–germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This double-blind phase III study evaluated ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in untreated non–germinal center B-cell DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to ibrutinib (560 mg per day orally) plus R-CHOP or placebo plus R-CHOP. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the activated B-cell (ABC) DLBCL subgroup. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib plus R-CHOP (n = 419) or placebo plus R-CHOP (n = 419). Median age was 62.0 years; 75.9% of evaluable patients had ABC subtype disease, and baseline characteristics were balanced. Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP did not improve EFS in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.934) or ABC (HR, 0.949) population. A preplanned analysis showed a significant interaction between treatment and age. In patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS (HR, 0.579), PFS (HR, 0.556), and OS (HR, 0.330) and slightly increased serious adverse events (35.7% v 28.6%), but the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP was similar between treatment arms (92.9% v 93.0%). In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP worsened EFS, PFS, and OS, increased serious adverse events (63.4% v 38.2%), and decreased the proportion of patients receiving at least six cycles of R-CHOP (73.7% v 88.8%). CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary end point in the ITT or ABC population. However, in patients age younger than 60 years, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP improved EFS, PFS, and OS with manageable safety. In patients age 60 years or older, ibrutinib plus R-CHOP was associated with increased toxicity, leading to compromised R-CHOP administration and worse outcomes. Further investigation is warranted.

* Authors on the Steering Committee contributed equally to the oversight of the study, including study design and maintaining the quality of study conduct. CONTRIBUTORS Owen O'Connor, Barbara Pro, Tim Illidge and Lorenz Trumper formed the ECHELON-2 steering committee and contributed equally to the oversight of the study, including study design and maintaining the quality of study conduct.

No abstract

Patients with newly diagnosed, stages IE to IIE, nasal ENKTL are best treated with frontline CCRT.

Background. With the introduction of cisplatincontaining regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, promising clinical results have been reported. A 61.5% response rate was observed with a combination of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) infusion and bolus cisplatin; however, the superiority of cisplatin‐containing regimens to other regimens has not been clearly verified in any randomized controlled studies. A prospective, randomized study of 5‐FU and cisplatin (FP) versus 5‐FU, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C (FAM) versus 5‐FU alone (FU) in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer is reported. Methods. A total of 324 patients were entered into the trial and 295 patients (103 for FP, 98 for FAM, 94 for FU) were evaluable. The patients were randomized to receive FP, FAM, or FU after stratifying by the following factors: performance status, presence of measurable disease, and resection of the primary tumor. Results. The overall response rate for patients with measurable disease in the FP arm was significantly higher than in the FAM and FU arms (51% for FP; 25% for FAM; 26% for FU). The durations of response for each arm, however, were not significantly different. Even though the median time to progression for the FP arm (21.8 weeks) was longer than that for the FAM arm (12 weeks; P < 0.05) and for the FU arm (9.1 weeks; P < 0.005), there was no statistical difference in overall survival among the three arms. Toxicity for all three regimens was moderate and consisted primarily of myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Conclusions. Although the FP regimen showed a significantly higher response rate and a longer time to progression than the FAM or FU regimens, a survival benefit was not observed.

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the impact of surgery on the outcomes and qualities of life (QOL) in patients with intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We assessed 345 patients with either localized or disseminated intestinal DLBCL and compared them according to treatment: surgical resection followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. In patients with localized disease (Lugano stage I/II), surgery plus chemotherapy yielded a lower relapse rate (15.3%) than did chemotherapy alone (36.8%, P < .001). The 3-year overall survival rate was 91% in the surgery plus chemotherapy group and 62% in the chemotherapy-alone group (P < .001). The predominant pattern in the chemotherapy group was local relapse (27.6%). When rituximab was used with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP), there was no improvement of the outcomes in patients treated with primary surgical resection. The QOL of patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy was lower than chemotherapy alone, but its difference was acceptable. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical resection plus chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Surgical resection followed by chemotherapy might be an effective treatment strategy with acceptable QOL deterioration for localized intestinal DLBCL. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01043302. (Blood. 2011;117(6): [1958][1959][1960][1961][1962][1963][1964][1965]