All patients with confirmed Corona Virus Disease 2019 were enrolled, and their clinical data were gathered by reviewing electronic medical records. Outcomes of severely ill patients and non-severely ill patients were compared. Results Of 145 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the average age was 47.5 years old (standard deviation, 14.6) and 54.5% were men. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (15.2%), followed by diabetes mellitus (9.7%). Common symptoms included dry cough (81.4%), fever (75.2%), anorexia (42.8%), fatigue (40.7%), chest tightness (32.4%), diarrhea (26.9%) and dizziness (20%). According to imaging examination, 79.3% patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 18.6% showed unilateral pneumonia, 61.4% showed ground-glass opacity, and 2.1% showed no abnormal result. Compared with non-severely ill patients, severely ill patients were older (mean, years, 52.8 vs. 45.3, p < 0.01), had a higher proportion of diabetes mellitus (16.3% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.08), had a higher body mass index (mean, 24.78 vs. 23.20, p = 0.02) and were more likely to have fever (90.7% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.01), anorexia (60.5% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.01), chest tightness (60.5% vs.20.6%, p < 0.01) and dyspnea (7.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.03). Of the 43 severely ill patients, 6 (14%) received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, and 1 (2.3%) received invasive mechanical ventilation. Conclusions Older patients or patients with comorbidities such as obesity or diabetes mellitus were more likely to have severe condition. Treatments of COVID-19 is still experimental and more clinical trials are needed.

PurposeAlthough the enterococcal bloodstream infections (EBSI) are often observed in clinic, the mixed-EBSI are few reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of mixed-EBSI in comparison with monomicrobial EBSI (mono-EBSI).MethodsA single-center retrospective observational study was performed between Jan 1, 2013 and Dec 31, 2018 in a tertiary hospital. All patients with EBSI were enrolled, and their data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records.ResultsA total of 451 patients with EBSI were enrolled including 157 cases (34.8%) with mixed-EBSI. The most common co-pathogens were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (26.86%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (23.43%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.57%). In multivariable analysis, burn injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69–20.28), and length of prior hospital stay (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02) were associated with mixed-EBSI. Patients with mixed-EBSI developed with more proportion of septic shock (19% vs. 31.8%, p=0.002), prolonged length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [9(0,25) vs. 15(2.5,36), p<0.001] and hospital stay [29(16,49) vs. 33(18.5,63), p=0.031]. The mortality was not significantly different between mixed-EBSI and mono-EBSI (p=0.219).ConclusionA high rate of mixed-EBSI is among EBSI, and Acinetobacter baumannii is the second predominant co-existed species, except for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Burn injury and length of prior hospital stay are independent risk factors for mixed-EBSI. Although the mortality is not different, patients with mixed-EBSI might have poor outcomes in comparison with mono-EBSI, which merits more attention by physicians in the future.

Background: Although Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SA-BSI) are a common and important infection, polymicrobial SA-BSI are infrequently reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of polymicrobial SA-BSI in comparison with monomicrobial SA-BSI. Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was performed between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018 at a tertiary hospital. All patients with SA-BSI were enrolled, and their clinical data were gathered by reviewing electronic medical records. Results: A total of 349 patients with SA-BSI were enrolled including 54 cases (15.5%) with polymicrobial SA-BSI. In multivariable analysis, burn injury (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-28.94), need of blood transfusion (aOR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.14-6.50), use of mechanical ventilation (aOR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.16-8.30), the length of prior hospital stay (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03), and pneumonia as primary site of infection (aOR, 4.22; 95% CI, 1.69-10.51) were independent factors of polymicrobial SA-BSI. In comparison with monomicrobial SA-BSI, patients with polymicrobial SA-BSI had longer length of ICU stay [median days, 23(6.25,49.25) vs. 0(0,12), p < 0.01] and hospital stay [median days, 50(21.75,85.75) vs. 28(15,49), p < 0.01], and showed a higher 28-day mortality (29.6% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Burn injury, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, the length of prior hospital stay, and pneumonia as a primary site of infection are independent risk factors for polymicrobial SA-BSI. In addition, patients with polymicrobial SA-BSI might have worse outcomes compared with monomicrobial SA-BSI.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of mixed Candida albicans/bacterial bloodstream infections (mixed-CA/B-BSIs) compared with monomicrobial Candida albicans bloodstream infection (mono-CA-BSI) in adult patients in China. Methods All hospitalized adults with Candida albicans bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) were recruited for this retrospective observational study from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. Results Of the 117 patients with CA-BSI, 24 patients (20.5%) had mixed-CA/B-BSIs. The most common copathogens were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (24.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (16.0%). In the multivariable analysis, a prior ICU stay > 2 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.445; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.152–48.132) was an independent risk factor for mixed-CA/B-BSIs. Compared with patients with mono-CA-BSI, patients with mixed-CA/B-BSIs had a prolonged length of mechanical ventilation [17.5 (4.5, 34.8) vs. 3.0 (0.0, 24.5), p = 0.019] and prolonged length of ICU stay [22.0 (14.3, 42.2) vs. 8.0 (0.0, 31.5), p = 0.010]; however, mortality was not significantly different. Conclusions There was a high rate of mixed-CA/B-BSIs cases among CA-BSI cases, and CNS was the predominant coexisting species. A prior ICU stay > 2 days was an independent risk factor for mixed -CA/B-BSIs. Although there was no difference in mortality, the outcomes of patients with mixed -CA/B-BSIs, including prolonged length of mechanical ventilation and prolonged length of ICU stay, were worse than those with mono-CA-BSI; this deserves further attention from clinicians.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of the mixed Candida albicans/bacterial bloodstream infections (mixed-CA/B-BSIs) compared with monomicrobial Candida albicans bloodstream infection (mono-CA-BSI) in adult patients in China.Methods: All adult hospitalized cases of Candida albicans bloodstream infection (CA-BSI) were recruited in the retrospective observational study from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018.Results: Of the 117 patients with CA-BSI, 24 patients (20.5%) were mixed-CA/B-BSIs. The most common co-pathogens were Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (24.0%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (16.0%). In multivariable analysis, prior ICU stay>2days (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.808; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.264-48.233) was an independent factor of mixed-CA/B-BSIs. In comparison with mono-CA-BSI, patients with mixed-CA/B-BSIs developed with prolonged length of mechanical ventilation [17.5(4.5,34.8) vs. 3.0(0.0,24.5), P=0.019], prolonged length of ICU stay [22.0(14.3, 42.2) vs. 8.0(0.0, 31.5), P=0.010], whereas the mortality was not significantly different. Conclusions: A high rate of mixed-CA/B-BSIs is among CA-BSI, and Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus is the predominant co-existed species. Prior ICU stay>2 days is an independent risk factor for mixed-CA/B-BSIs. Although there is no difference in mortality, the outcomes of patients with mixed-CA/B-BSIs including prolonged length of mechanical ventilation and prolonged length of ICU stay were worse than those with mono-CA-BSI, which deserves further attention of clinicians.

Purpose Candida albicans ( C. albicans ) candidemia has been well reported in previous studies, while research on non -albicans Candida (NAC) bloodstream infections remains poorly explored. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with NAC candidemia. Patients and Methods We recruited inpatients with candidemia from January 2013 to June 2020 in a tertiary hospital for this retrospective observational study. Results A total of 301 patients with candidemia were recruited in the current study, including 161 (53.5%) patients with NAC candidemia. The main pathogens in NAC candidemia were Candida tropicalis ( C. tropicalis ) (23.9%), Candida parapsilosis (15.6%) and Candida glabrata (10.3%). Patients with NAC candidemia had more medical admissions ( P =0.034), a higher percentage of hematological malignancies ( P =0.007), a higher frequency of antifungal exposure ( P =0.012), and more indwelling peripherally inserted central catheters ( P =0.002) than those with C. albicans candidemia. In a multivariable analysis, prior antifungal exposure was independently related to NAC candidemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.312; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.113–0.859). Additionally, NAC was obviously resistant to azoles, especially C. tropicalis had a high cross-resistance to azoles. However, no significant differences were noted in the mortality rates at 14 days, 28 days and 60 days between these two groups. Conclusion NAC is dominant in candidemia, and prior antifungal exposure is an independent risk factor. Of note, although the outcomes of NAC and C. albicans candidemia are similar, drug resistance to specific azoles as well as cross-resistance frequently occurs in patients with NAC candidemia, and this drug resistance deserves attention in clinical practice and further in-depth investigation.

Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.009 ). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p = 0.001 ) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p = 0.038 ) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p < 0.05 ). The mortality did not differ between polymicrobial KP-BSI and monomicrobial KP-BSI (all p > 0.05 ). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI.

Background Until January 18, 2021, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 93 million individuals and has caused a certain degree of panic. Viral pneumonia caused by common viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, human metapneumovirus, human bocavirus, and parainfluenza viruses have been more common in children. However, the incidence of COVID-19 in children was significantly lower than that in adults. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 in children compared with those of other sources of viral pneumonia diagnosed during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods Children with COVID-19 and viral pneumonia admitted to 20 hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective multi-center cohort study. A total of 64 children with COVID-19 were defined as the COVID-19 cohort, of which 40 children who developed pneumonia were defined as the COVID-19 pneumonia cohort. Another 284 children with pneumonia caused by other viruses were defined as the viral pneumonia cohort. The epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory findings were compared by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Contingency table method. Drug usage, immunotherapy, blood transfusion, and need for oxygen support were collected as the treatment indexes. Mortality, intensive care needs and symptomatic duration were collected as the outcome indicators. Results Compared with the viral pneumonia cohort, children in the COVID-19 cohort were mostly exposed to family members confirmed to have COVID-19 (53/64 vs. 23/284), were of older median age (6.3 vs. 3.2 years), and had a higher proportion of ground-glass opacity (GGO) on computed tomography (18/40 vs. 0/38, P < 0.001). Children in the COVID-19 pneumonia cohort had a lower proportion of severe cases (1/40 vs. 38/284, P = 0.048), and lower cases with high fever (3/40 vs. 167/284, P < 0.001), requiring intensive care (1/40 vs. 32/284, P < 0.047) and with shorter symptomatic duration (median 5 vs. 8 d, P < 0.001). The proportion of cases with evaluated inflammatory indicators, biochemical indicators related to organ or tissue damage, D-dimer and secondary bacterial infection were lower in the COVID-19 pneumonia cohort than those in the viral pneumonia cohort (P < 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the duration of positive PCR results from pharyngeal swabs in 25 children with COVID-19 who received antiviral drugs (lopinavir-ritonavir, ribavirin, and arbidol) as compared with duration in 39 children without antiviral therapy [median 10 vs. 9 d, P = 0.885]. Conclusion The symptoms and severity of COVID-19 pneumonia in children were no more severe than those in children with other viral pneumonia. Lopinavir-ritonavir, ribavirin and arbidol do not shorten the duration of positive PCR results from pharyngeal swabs in children with COVID-19. During the COVID-19 outbreak, attention also must be given to children with infection by other pathogens infection.