Background. Polymicrobial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (KP-BSI) has been reported to account for more than 10% of all KP-BSI, but few studies have characterized polymicrobial KP-BSI. Our study investigated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of polymicrobial KP-BSI by comparing with monomicrobial KP-BSI. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2018 and collected the clinical data by reviewing electronic medical records. Results. Of the 818 patients with KP-BSI recruited, 13.9% (114/818) were polymicrobial KP-BSI. The severity of illness in polymicrobial and monomicrobial KP-BSI was similar, while the rate of resistance to carbapenems was obviously higher in polymicrobial KP-BSI (78.1% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.009 ). On multivariate analysis, hospitalization in burn ward (odds ratio (OR) 6.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.00-18.76, p = 0.001 ) and intensive care unit (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.43, p = 0.038 ) was independently associated with polymicrobial KP-BSI. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for the highest proportion (68.9%) among copathogens of polymicrobial KP-BSI, whereas gram-positive bacteria (22.9%) and Candida (8.2%) ranked the second and the third, respectively, with Acinetobacter baumannii being the most common (23.0%). Patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had longer hospital days after BSI onset and total hospital days than patients with monomicrobial KP-BSI (median (interquartile range (IQR)), 19 (5, 39) vs. 12 (6, 25), 37 (21, 67) vs. 29 (16, 53), respectively, p < 0.05 ). The mortality did not differ between polymicrobial KP-BSI and monomicrobial KP-BSI (all p > 0.05 ). Conclusions. It was observed that polymicrobial KP-BSI accounted for a significant proportion among all KP-BSI in the current study. Hospitalization in burn ward and intensive care unit was an independent risk factor for the development of polymicrobial KP-BSI. The patients with polymicrobial KP-BSI had a higher rate of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and might have poor outcomes compared to monomicrobial KP-BSI.
Background. Although the clinical features of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are well described, the specific clinical characteristics of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection have been rarely reported. The objective of this study was to examine the risk factors for and clinical outcomes of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection. Methods. A retrospective observational study was performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in a tertiary hospital. All patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were enrolled, and the data were collected from the electronic medical records. Results. A total of 594 patients were included, 21% (126/594) of whom had polymicrobial infection. The most common copathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.81%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.78%) and Enterococcus faecium (12.08%). Compared with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection, polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection mostly originated from the skin and soft tissue (28.6% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001 ). Multivariate analysis revealed that burn injury was independently associated with polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (adjusted odds ratio, 3.569; 95% confidence interval, 1.954-6.516). Patients with polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were more likely to have a longer hospital length of stay [40 (21, 68) vs. 27 (16, 45), p < 0.001 ] and more hospitalization days after bloodstream infection than those with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection [22 (8, 50) vs. 13 (4, 28), p < 0.001 ]. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups. Conclusions. Approximately one-fifth of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections were polymicrobial in this cohort. The main sources were skin and soft tissue infections, and burn injury was the only independent risk factor. Although mortality did not differ between the groups, considering the limitations of the study, further studies are required to assess the impact of polymicrobial (vs. monomicrobial) Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection on outcomes.
Background: Although the clinical features of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are well described, the specific clinical characteristics of mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are rarely reported. The objective of this study was to examine the risk factors and clinical outcomes of mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection. Methods: A retrospectively observational study was performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in a tertiary hospital. All patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were enrolled,the data were collected from electronic medical records. Results: A total of 594 episodes were enrolled, 21% (126/594) of which were mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection.The most common co-pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.81%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.78%) and Enterococcus faecium (12.08%). Compared with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection, the main source of mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection was from skin and soft tissue(28.6% vs.10.5%, P<0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed burn injury was independently associated with mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection(adjusted odds ratio,3.569; 95% confidence interval, 1.954-6.516). Patients with mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were more likely to have longer hospitalization length of stay [40(21,68) vs. 27(16,45), P<0.001]and hospitalization days after BSI [22(8,50) vs. 13(4,28), P<0.001]. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection is not a rare event, which accounts for one fifth of all Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection. The main source is from skin and soft tissue, and burn injury is an independent risk factor. Although the mortality is not different, patients with mixed Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection might have poor outcomes, which merits more attention by physicians in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.