The authors discuss the development of a track-based approach to working with disordered eating patients in an inpatient psychiatric facility. Because of the high mortality rate and complex presentation of patients with eating disorders, treatment is essential. However, treatment in a specialized eating disorder program is not always feasible. The authors present their rationale for creating an Eating Disorder Track imbedded in an inpatient facility that offers several-week lengths of stay conducive to intensive psychotherapeutic and milieu treatment.
Summary Social workers’ eating disorder mental health literacy (ED-MHL) is essential to the detection, assessment, and treatment of eating disorders (EDs) and disordered eating (DE) in clinical practice. This study explored social workers’ ED-MHL, particularly the assessment practices of EDs on intake forms, and within the first two therapy sessions. Participants in this national survey were N = 316 outpatient masters-level social workers in the United States. Participants completed an online survey measuring ED assessment practices in clinical practice. Findings Results showed that 42.4% ( n = 133) of respondents did not routinely assess for EDs/DE on clinical intake forms, and 53.2% ( n = 165) did not assess within the first two therapy sessions. However, those with recent training related to EDs were more likely to assess. Participants reported low to moderate perceived comfort levels with the assessment of EDs, and training and education were identified as needed resources. Social workers reported deficits in their own assessment practices of EDs. Barriers included: lack of training about EDs/DE; uncertainty about process questions to ask; and perceptions that EDs/DE are rarely the client's primary presenting problem. Applications Difficulties with detection and screening practices appeared contingent on gaps in existing education and training related to EDs/DE. These findings suggest that future research may serve to increase social workers’ ED-MHL, as underscored by the noteworthy finding that 86.1% ( n = 229) of the sample reported that they would make proactive changes in their clinical practice, as a direct result of participating in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.