The purpose of this article is to 1) address a paradigm shift taking place in the field of substance abuse prevention directed for youth and 2) to introduce an innovative approach to substance abuse and other problem behavior prevention that reflects this shift in prevention paradigm. The new path introduced is youth development and empowerment (YD&E) approach. In order to establish a conceptual foundation for this approach, this article 3) reviews the theoretical advances made in the field of substance abuse prevention during the last three decades. This is followed by a conceptualization of the processes of implementing the YD&E program by 4) specifying the mechanism used for the empowering processes and by 5) identifying the structural components of the youth empowerment model that serve the empowering processes. It is hoped that this article serves as a conduit for an improved approach to adolescent substance abuse prevention and youth development that goes beyond, rather than against, the traditional risk-factor approach. In this new approach, youths are viewed as assets and resources to our community rather than social problems or community liabilities. The organizing concept of this new paradigm is: social, economic, and public opportunity denied to youth is equal to social problems imposed on youth by adults.
To date, benefit-cost analysis has rarely been used to justify the drug abuse prevention field. However, there is an increasing demand for this type of analysis as the field of substance abuse prevention enters a new phase--a phase characterized by a competitive marketplace, an increased demand for accountability, and the desire to measure return on the money invested in prevention. In response, an effort is made to stimulate discussion and further research on the topic. This article first determines the overall strategy for initiating benefit-cost analysis (BCA), followed by definitions of BCA and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). This is followed by the determination of some of the major variables used in BCA along with the algorithm for determining the benefit-cost efficiency ratio (R) as it applies to the macro level analysis. In estimating a value for the R, a decision has been made to incorporate uncertainty into the BCA. In a macroscopic approach to BCA, four independent variables are identified for computing R. These independent and dependent variables are assumed to be random variables with normal distributions. The population means and standard deviations pertaining to these independent variables are estimated from the existing literature. In order to incorporate uncertainty into the computation of R, ten measurements have been randomly selected for each of the four independent variables. Following this procedure, fifteen benefit-cost efficiency ratios are calculated by selecting one of the ten values at random per variable used in the R equation. In this way, we were able to determine the most likely population benefit-cost efficiency ratio of 15:1, indicating that there is a $15 savings on every dollar spent on drug abuse prevention. The 95 percent confidence level pertaining to the R has an interval from $13.7 to $16.1. This indicates that the population R resides within the range 95 percent of the time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.