Most textbook knowledge on ventricular repolarization is based on animal data rather than on data from the in vivo human heart. Yet, these data have been extrapolated to the human heart, often without an appropriate caveat. Here, we review multiple aspects of repolarization, from basic membrane currents to cellular aspects including extrinsic factors such as the effects of the sympathetic nervous system. We critically discuss some mechanistic aspects of the genesis of the T-wave of the ECG in the human heart. Obviously, the T-wave results from the summation of repolarization all over the heart. The T-wave in a local electrogram ideally reflects local repolarization. The repolarization moment is composed of the moment of local activation plus local action potential duration (APD) at 90% repolarization (APD90). The duration of the latter largely depends on the balance between L-type Ca2+ current and the delayed rectifier currents. Generally speaking, there is an inverse relationship between local activation time and local APD90, leading to less dispersion in repolarization moments than in activation moments or in APD90. In transmural direction, the time needed for activation from endocardium toward epicardium has been considered to be overcompensated by shorter APD90 at the epicardium, leading to the earliest repolarization at the subepicardium. In addition, mid-myocardial cells would display the latest repolarization moments. The sparse human data available, however, do not show any transmural dispersion in repolarization moment. Also, the effect of adrenergic stimulation on APD90 has been studied mainly in animals. Again, sparse human data suggest that the effect of adrenergic stimulation is different in the human heart compared to many other mammalian hearts. Finally, aspects of the long QT syndrome are discussed, because this intrinsic genetic disease results from repolarization disorders with extrinsic aspects.

ST-segment elevation and epicardial fractionation/conduction delay in BrS patients are most likely related to the same structural subepicardial abnormalities, but the mechanism is different. ST-segment elevation may be caused by current-to-load mismatch, whereas fractionated electrograms and conduction delay are expected to be caused by discontinuous conduction in the same area with abnormal myocardium.

Background— The genesis of the electrocardiographic T wave is incompletely understood and subject to controversy. We have correlated the ventricular repolarization sequence with simultaneously recorded T waves. Methods and Results— Nine pig hearts were Langendorff-perfused (atrial pacing, cycle length 650 ms). Local activation and repolarization times were derived from unipolar electrograms sampling the ventricular myocardium. Dispersion of repolarization time was determined along 4 anatomic axes: left ventricle (LV)–right ventricle (RV), LV:apico-basal, LV:anterior-posterior, and LV:transmural. The heart was immersed in a fluid-filled bucket containing 61 electrodes to determine T p (T peak in lead of maximum integral), T p T e (T p to T end ), and T p T e _total (first T peak in any lead to last T end in any lead). Repolarization was nonlinearly distributed in time. RT 25 (time at which 25% of sites were repolarized, 288±26 ms) concurred with T p . T p T e was 38±8 ms, and T p T e _total was 75±9 ms. T p T e _total correlated with dispersion of repolarization time in the entire heart (73±18 ms), but not with dispersion of repolarization times along individual axes (LV–RV, 66±17 ms; LV:apico-basal, 51±18 ms; LV:anterior-posterior, 51±27 ms; mean LV:transmural, 14±7 ms; all n=9). Conclusions— We provide a correlation between local repolarization and T wave in a pseudo-ECG. Repolarization differences along all anatomic axes contribute to the T wave. T p T e _total represents total dispersion of repolarization. At T p , ≈25% of ventricular sites have been repolarized.