2015
DOI: 10.1161/circep.115.003366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ST-Segment Elevation and Fractionated Electrograms in Brugada Syndrome Patients Arise From the Same Structurally Abnormal Subepicardial RVOT Area but Have a Different Mechanism

Abstract: ST-segment elevation and epicardial fractionation/conduction delay in BrS patients are most likely related to the same structural subepicardial abnormalities, but the mechanism is different. ST-segment elevation may be caused by current-to-load mismatch, whereas fractionated electrograms and conduction delay are expected to be caused by discontinuous conduction in the same area with abnormal myocardium.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
50
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
50
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of structural abnormalities and reduced sodium channel function (either pharmacologically or genetically) may lead to current-to-load mismatch that both explains the Brugada sign and the arrhythmogenesis (Hoogendijk et al, 2010b).) There is increasing evidence that the RVOT subepicardium has a different structural and functional make-up (less sodium channel expression, less Cx43 expression, more fibrosis) than the RVOT subendocardium, also in patients without BrS (Ten Sande et al, 2015) and in healthy animals (Boukens et al, 2013). This leads to fractionated electrograms at the epicardium and not at the endocardium of patients with BrS (Nagase et al, 2002).…”
Section: Transmural Differences and Brugada Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of structural abnormalities and reduced sodium channel function (either pharmacologically or genetically) may lead to current-to-load mismatch that both explains the Brugada sign and the arrhythmogenesis (Hoogendijk et al, 2010b).) There is increasing evidence that the RVOT subepicardium has a different structural and functional make-up (less sodium channel expression, less Cx43 expression, more fibrosis) than the RVOT subendocardium, also in patients without BrS (Ten Sande et al, 2015) and in healthy animals (Boukens et al, 2013). This leads to fractionated electrograms at the epicardium and not at the endocardium of patients with BrS (Nagase et al, 2002).…”
Section: Transmural Differences and Brugada Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, transmural structural differences play a role in the genesis of BrS . Indeed, epicardial ablation of sites showing fractionated electrograms cured patients with Brugada syndrome, and diminished the Brugada sign (Nademanee et al, 2011;Ten Sande et al, 2015).…”
Section: Transmural Differences and Brugada Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Исследования на животных моделях син-дрома Бругада показали, что нарушение проведе-ния и структурные аномалии сильнее выражены в правом желудочке, чем в левом. Это согласуется с клиническими данными электроанатомического картирования о задержке деполяризации в выходя-щем тракте правого желудочка [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Недавнее исследование когорты пациентов с синдромом Бру-гада методом панорамного картирования желудоч-ка показало удлинение электросистолы и уменьше-ние скорости проведения (при увеличении диспер-сии этого параметра) [40].…”
Section: том 4 №4 / 2017unclassified
“…Третий механизм предполагает рассогласование I to в правом желудочке [54]. Оно может возникать в участках, где наблюдаются структурные изме-нения и ткань миокарда замещена коллагеном или жировой тканью [39]. В доклинических исследова-ниях блокирование натриевых каналов аймалином приводило к блокаде проведения и утрате возбу-димости, которая была ассоциирована с подъемом сегмента ST на ЭКГ [55].…”
Section: том 4 №4 / 2017unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation