Masticatory forces cause fatigue to cement-retained crowns and abutments and may adversely effect retention. The relation between the number of load cycles and the retentive forces is important. This study evaluated the effect of compressive cyclic loading on the retentive forces of a temporary cement used to retain implant crowns and the relationship between load cycles and retentive forces. Ten castings and implant abutments were cemented with zinc oxide-eugenol temporary cement. The retentive force necessary to dislodge the casting from the abutment was determined before and after the application of 2 Hz of vertical off-axis 3-mm sinusoidal-type compressive cyclic loading between 20 and 130 N for 500000, 1000000, and 5000000 cycles. These forces were equivalent to approximately 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years of human mastication. Data before and after the applied loading were analyzed with a paired sample t test (alpha = 0.05). The retentive forces of the 3 groups were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc by Scheffé multiple comparison (alpha = 0.05). The relation of the loading and the altered retentive forces were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Compressive cyclic loading reduced the retentive forces significantly in all groups (P = .000). The retentive forces were reduced 16.75%, 18.73%, and 19.68% during the applied loading cycles of 500000, 1000000, and 5000000. All reduced retentive forces were not significantly different (P = .792). Although cyclic loading reduced the retentive forces, the increased cycles had little relationship (R = 0.119) to the decreased retentive forces of the temporary cement. The relationship between occlusal loading and retentive force can influence the choice of a temporary cement for a particular clinical situation.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanner (IOS) systems with three different dental arch widths. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three dental models with different intermolar widths (small, medium, and large) were attached to metal bars of different lengths (30, 40, and 50 mm). The bars were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Three IOSs were compared: TRIOS 3 (TRI), True Definition (TD), and Dental Wings (DW). The relative length and angular deviation of both ends of the metal bars from the scan data set (n = 15) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS Comparing among scanners in terms of trueness, the relative length deviation of DW in the small (1.28%) and medium (1.08%) arches were significantly higher than TRI (0.46% and 0.48%) and TD (0.33% and 0.18%). The angular deviation of DW in the small (1.75°) and medium (1.83°) arches were also significantly greater than TRI (0.63° and 0.40°) and TD (0.55° and 0.89°). Comparing within scanner, the large arch of DW showed better accuracy than other arch sizes ( P < .05). On the other hand, the larger arch of TD presented a greater tendency of angular deviation in terms of trueness. No significant differences were found in terms of trueness between the arch widths of TRI group. CONCLUSION The different widths of the dental arches can affect the accuracy of some intraoral scanners in full arch scan.
Stainless steel wrought wires used as clasp arms for removable partial dentures in Thailand were compared with those used in some other countries (in the as-received condition) in terms of flexibility, Vickers microhardness and composition. The results showed that there were significant differences (P•¬0.05) among the wires. A Japanese stainless steel wire (SK) was obviously different from the others. It had the lowest proportional limit and microhardness, but its flexibility was almost the same. The chemical composition of each wire was not greatly different. The wires were about 18-20 wt% chromium and 8-9 wt% nickel, except for the SK wire, which had about 12 wt% nickel.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.