Sepabeads-EP (a new epoxy support) has been utilized to immobilize-stabilize the enzyme penicillin G acylase (PGA) via multipoint covalent attachment. These supports are very robust and suitable for industrial purposes. Also, the internal geometry of the support is composed by cylindrical pores surrounded by the convex surfaces (this offers a good geometrical congruence for reaction with the enzyme), and it has a very high superficial density of epoxy groups (around 100 micromol/mL). These features should permit a very intense enzyme-support interaction. However, the final stability of the immobilized enzyme is strictly dependent on the immobilization protocol. By using conventional immobilization protocols (neutral pH values, nonblockage of the support) the stability of the immobilized enzyme was quite similar to that achieved using Eupergit C to immobilize the PGA. However, when using a more sophisticated three-step immobilization/stabilization/blockage procedure, the Sepabeads derivative was hundreds-fold more stable than Eupergit C derivatives. The protocol used was as follows: (i) the enzyme was first covalently immobilized under very mild experimental conditions (e.g., pH 7.0 and 20 degrees C); (ii) the already immobilized enzyme was further incubated under more drastic conditions (higher pH values, long incubation periods, etc.) in order to "facilitate" the formation of new covalent linkages between the immobilized enzyme molecule and the support; (iii) the remaining epoxy groups of the support were blocked with very hydrophilic compounds to stop any additional interaction between the enzyme and the support. This third point was found to be critical for obtaining very stable enzymes: derivatives blocked with mercaptoethanol were much less stable than derivatives blocked with glycine or other amino acids. This was attributed to the better masking of the hydrophobicity of the support by the amino acids (having two charges).
Multifunctional supports containing epoxy groups are here proposed as a second generation of activated supports for covalent immobilization of enzymes following the epoxy chemistry on any type of support (hydrophobic or hydrophilic ones) under very mild experimental conditions (e.g., low ionic strength, neutral pH values, and low temperatures). These multifunctional supports have been easily prepared by modifying a small fraction (10-20%) of the epoxy groups contained in commercial epoxy supports. In this way, additional groups that were able to physically adsorb proteins (e.g., cationic or anionic groups, metal chelate, phenyl boronate) are generated on the support surface. The covalent immobilization of proteins on these supports proceeds via their initial physical adsorption on the supports (via different structural features). Then, "intramolecular" covalent linkages between some nucleophilic groups of the adsorbed enzyme (e.g., amino, thiol, or hydroxy groups) and the dense layer of nearby epoxy groups on the support are established. This two-step covalent immobilization dramatically improves the very low reactivity of epoxy groups toward nonadsorbed proteins. In this way, all other relevant practical advantages of epoxy groups for protein immobilization (their high stability and their ability to form very strong linkages with several nucleophilic enzyme residues with minimal chemical modification) can be an object of universal exploitation. The use of these new multifunctional supports exhibits important advantages regarding immobilization of enzymes previously adsorbed on hydrophobic homofunctional epoxy supports: (i) hydrophilic supports can also be used for immobilization of industrial enzymes; (ii) immobilization can also be carried out at low ionic strength; (iii) every protein contained in crude extracts from Escherichia coli and Acetobacter turbidans can be immobilized by sequentially using a set of different supports; (iv) in most cases, each enzyme has been immobilized on different supports, orientated through different structural features and very likely involving different areas of its surface. For example, three industrial enzymes (penicillin G acylase, lipase, and beta-galactosidase) could be immobilized through different strategies yielding immobilized derivatives with very different activities. The best derivatives preserved 75-100% of activity corresponding to the soluble enzymes used for immobilization, while in some cases a particular immobilization protocol promoted the full inactivation of the enzyme.
The properties of a new commercially available amino-epoxy support (amino-epoxy-Sepabeads) for immobilizing enzymes have been compared to those of conventional epoxy supports. The new support has a layer of epoxy groups over a layer of ethylenediamine that is covalently bound to the support. Thus, this support has a great anionic exchanger power and a high number of epoxy groups. We have found a number of advantages to this new heterofunctional support. Immobilization proceeds at low ionic strength using amino epoxy Sepabeads while requiring high ionic strength using conventional monofunctional epoxy supports. Immobilization is much more rapid using amino-epoxy supports than employing conventional epoxy supports. The possibility of achieving immobilized preparations in which the enzyme orientation may be different to that obtained using the traditional hydrophobic supports (with likely effects in terms of activity or stability). Stability of the immobilized enzyme has been found to be much higher using the new support than in preparations using the conventional ones in many cases. Here we show some examples of these advantages using different enzymes (beta-galactosidases, lipase, glutaryl acylase, invertase, and glucoamylase).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.