In this paper, we will review the anatomical components of the visuomotor cerebellum in human and, where possible, in non-human primates and discuss their function in relation to those of extracerebellar visuomotor regions with which they are connected. The floccular lobe, the dorsal paraflocculus, the oculomotor vermis, the uvula–nodulus, and the ansiform lobule are more or less independent components of the visuomotor cerebellum that are involved in different corticocerebellar and/or brain stem olivocerebellar loops. The floccular lobe and the oculomotor vermis share different mossy fiber inputs from the brain stem; the dorsal paraflocculus and the ansiform lobule receive corticopontine mossy fibers from postrolandic visual areas and the frontal eye fields, respectively. Of the visuomotor functions of the cerebellum, the vestibulo-ocular reflex is controlled by the floccular lobe; saccadic eye movements are controlled by the oculomotor vermis and ansiform lobule, while control of smooth pursuit involves all these cerebellar visuomotor regions. Functional imaging studies in humans further emphasize cerebellar involvement in visual reflexive eye movements and are discussed.

Several studies indicate that the cerebellum might play a role in experiencing and/or controlling emphatic emotions, but it remains to be determined whether there is a distinction between positive and negative emotions, and, if so, which specific parts of the cerebellum are involved in these types of emotions. Here, we visualized activations of the cerebellum and extracerebellar regions using high-field fMRI, while we asked participants to observe and imitate images with pictures of human faces expressing different emotional states or with moving geometric shapes as control. The state of the emotions could be positive (happiness and surprise), negative (anger and disgust), or neutral. The positive emotional faces only evoked mild activations of crus 2 in the cerebellum, whereas the negative emotional faces evoked prominent activations in lobules VI and VIIa in its hemispheres and lobules VIII and IX in the vermis. The cerebellar activations associated with negative emotions occurred concomitantly with activations of mirror neuron domains such as the insula and amygdala. These data suggest that the potential role of the cerebellum in control of emotions may be particularly relevant for goal-directed behavior that is required for observing and reacting to another person’s (negative) expressions.

ReXexive saccades are driven by visual stimulation whereas voluntary saccades require volitional control. Behavioral and lesional studies suggest that there are two separate mechanisms involved in the generation of these two types of saccades. This study investigated diVerences in cerebral and cerebellar activation between reXexive and self-paced voluntary saccadic eye movements using functional magnetic resonance imaging. In two experiments (whole brain and cerebellum) using the same paradigm, diVerences in brain activations induced by reXexive and self-paced voluntary saccades were assessed. Direct comparison of the activation patterns showed that the frontal eye Welds, parietal eye Weld, the motion-sensitive area (MT/ V5), the precuneus (V6), and the angular and the cingulate gyri were more activated in reXexive saccades than in voluntary saccades. No signiWcant diVerence in activation was found in the cerebellum. Our results suggest that the alleged separate mechanisms for saccadic control of reXexive and self-paced voluntary are mainly observed in cerebral rather than cerebellar areas.

Saccades are fast eye movements that direct the point of regard to a target in the visual field. Repeated post-saccadic visual errors can induce modifications of the amplitude of these saccades, a process known as saccadic adaptation. Two experiments using the same paradigm were performed to study the involvement of the cerebrum and the cerebellum in the processing of saccadic errors using functional magnetic resonance imaging and in-scanner eye movement recordings. In the first active condition, saccadic adaptation was prevented using a condition in which the saccadic target was shifted to a variable position during the saccade towards it. This condition induced random saccadic errors as opposed to the second active condition in which the saccadic target was not shifted. In the baseline condition, subjects looked at a stationary dot. Both active conditions compared with baseline evoked activation in the expected saccade-related regions using a stringent statistical threshold [the frontal and parietal eye fields, primary visual area, MT/V5, and the precuneus (V6) in the cerebrum; vermis VI-VII; and lobule VI in the cerebellum, known as the oculomotor vermis). In the direct comparison between the two active conditions, significantly more cerebellar activation (vermis VIII, lobules VIII-X, left lobule VIIb) was observed with random saccadic errors (using a more relaxed statistical threshold). These results suggest a possible role for areas outside the oculomotor vermis of the cerebellum in the processing of saccadic errors. Future studies of these areas with, e.g., electrophysiological recordings, may reveal the nature of the error signals that drive the amplitude modification of saccadic eye movements.