No abstract

The clinical benefits of using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass the left anterior descending artery are well established making it the most frequently used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) occurs during left arm exertion when (1) the LIMA is used during bypass surgery and (2) there is a high grade (≥75%) left subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion proximal to the ostia of the LIMA resulting in "stealing" of the myocardial blood supply via retrograde flow up the LIMA graft to maintain left upper extremity perfusion. Although CSSS was once thought to be a rare phenomenon, its prevalence has been underestimated and is becoming increasingly recognized as a serious threat to the success of CABG. Current guidelines are lacking on recommendations for screening of subclavian artery stenosis (SAS) pre- and post-CABG. We hope to provide an algorithm for SAS screening to prevent CSSS in internal mammary artery bypass recipients and review treatment options in the percutaneous era.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

No abstract

The EXCITE ISR trial is the first large, prospective, randomized study to demonstrate superiority of ELA + PTA versus PTA alone for treating femoropopliteal ISR. (Randomized Study of Laser and Balloon Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty to Treat Peripheral In-stent Restenosis [EXCITE ISR]; NCT01330628).

No abstract

Background Underuse of guideline‐recommended therapy in peripheral artery disease ( PAD ) in administrative and procedural databases has been described, but reports on medically managed patients and referral to supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) in PAD are lacking. We aimed to document the use of PAD guideline‐recommended therapy, including SET in patients with PAD symptoms consulting a specialty clinic across 3 countries. Methods and Results The 16‐center PORTRAIT (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry enrolled 1275 patients with new or an exacerbation of PAD symptoms (2011–2015). We prospectively documented antiplatelet medications, statins, smoking cessation counseling and/or therapy, and referral to SET : “2 quality measures” referred to the use of both statin and antiplatelet medications; “4 quality measures” to receiving all 4 measures. Median odds ratios were calculated to quantify treatment variation across sites. A total of 89% patients were on antiplatelets, 83% on statins, and 23% had been referred to SET . Of 455 current smokers, 342 (72%) patients received smoking cessation therapy/counseling. Overall, 77.2% of patients received “2 quality measures” and 19.7% “4 quality measures.” The median odds ratio for 2 quality measures was 2.13 (95% CI , 1.61–3.56; P <0.001) and for 4 quality measures was 5.43 (95% CI , 2.84–17.91; P <0.001). Variability in adherence was not explained by country, except for referral to SET . The odds for SET referral in The Netherlands (70% referral rate) was nearly 100 times greater than in US sites (2% referral rate). Conclusions Not all patients who have undergone a PAD workup at a specialty care facility are treated with evidence‐based care, especially so for SET .

Background Drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as a mainstay of therapy for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. We performed a meta‐analysis including all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to date which compare DCB to plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) in femoropopliteal disease (FPD). Methods Five databases were analyzed including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web‐of‐Science from January 2000 to September 2018 for RCTs comparing DCB to POBA in patients with FPD. Heterogeneity was determined using Cochrane's Q‐statistics. Random effects model was used. Results Twenty‐two RCTs, including five trials of in‐stent restenosis (ISR) intervention, with 3,217 patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow‐up was approximately 21.6 ± 14.4 months. Overall, DCB use was associated with a 51% reduction in target vessel revascularization (TLR) when compared to POBA at follow‐up (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.61, P < 0.0001). Rates of TLR were 45% lower in the DCB group when compared to POBA in patients with ISR (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.81, P = 0.002). DCB was associated with lower rates of binary stenosis, late lumen loss and higher primary safety endpoints. Major amputation and mortality were not different between DCB and POBA. Conclusions Use of DCBs is associated with improved vessel patency and a lower risk of TLR when compared to POBA in patients with FPD, especially in the setting of ISR. There was no difference in mortality between DCB and POBA in our meta‐analysis. Extended follow‐up of the available RCT data will be essential to analyze long‐term device‐related mortality.