A side population (SP) has been identified in a number of tissues, where it typically represents a small population enriched in stem/progenitor cells. In this study we show that the adult mouse anterior pituitary (AP) also contains a characteristic SP displaying verapamil-sensitive Hoechst dye efflux capacity. A majority of the SP cells express stem cell antigen 1 at a high level (Sca1high). Using (semi)quantitative RT-PCR and immunofluorescence, we characterized the Sca1high SP as a population enriched in cells expressing stem/progenitor cell-associated factors and components of the Notch, Wnt, and sonic hedgehog signaling pathways, functional in stem cell homeostasis as well as in early pituitary embryogenesis. Lhx4, a transcription factor pivotal for early embryonic development of the AP, was only detected in the Sca1high SP, whereas Lhx3, in contrast to Lhx4 not down-regulated after AP development, was only found in the main population. The Sca1high SP was depleted from cells expressing phenotypic markers of differentiated AP cells (hormones), but contained a small proportion of folliculo-stellate cells. Stem cells of many tissues can clonally expand to nonadherent spheres in culture. Clonal spheres also developed in AP cell cultures. Spheres showed an expression pattern resembling that of Sca1high SP cells. Moreover, the sphere-initiating cells of the pituitary segregated to the SP and not to the main population. In conclusion, we show that the adult pituitary contains a hitherto undescribed population of cells with SP phenotype and clonal expansion capacity. These cells express (signaling) molecules generally found in stem/progenitor cells and/or operative during pituitary early embryonic development. These characteristics are supportive of a stem/progenitor cell phenotype.
Living organisms represent, in essence, dynamic interactions of high complexity between membrane‐separated compartments that cannot exist on their own, but reach behaviour in co‐ordination. In multicellular organisms, there must be communication and co‐ordination between individual cells and cell groups to achieve appropriate behaviour of the system. Depending on the mode of signal transportation and the target, intercellular communication is neuronal, hormonal, paracrine or juxtacrine. Cell signalling can also be self‐targeting or autocrine. Although the notion of paracrine and autocrine signalling was already suggested more than 100 years ago, it is only during the last 30 years that these mechanisms have been characterised. In the anterior pituitary, paracrine communication and autocrine loops that operate during fetal and postnatal development in mammals and lower vertebrates have been shown in all hormonal cell types and in folliculo‐stellate cells. More than 100 compounds have been identified that have, or may have, paracrine or autocrine actions. They include the neurotransmitters acetylcholine and γ‐aminobutyric acid, peptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptide, galanin, endothelins, calcitonin, neuromedin B and melanocortins, growth factors of the epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, nerve growth factor and transforming growth factor‐β families, cytokines, tissue factors such as annexin‐1 and follistatin, hormones, nitric oxide, purines, retinoids and fatty acid derivatives. In addition, connective tissue cells, endothelial cells and vascular pericytes may influence paracrinicity by delivering growth factors, cytokines, heparan sulphate proteoglycans and proteases. Basement membranes may influence paracrine signalling through the binding of signalling molecules to heparan sulphate proteoglycans. Paracrine/autocrine actions are highly context‐dependent. They are turned on/off when hormonal outputs need to be adapted to changing demands of the organism, such as during reproduction, stress, inflammation, starvation and circadian rhythms. Specificity and selectivity in autocrine/paracrine interactions may rely on microanatomical specialisations, functional compartmentalisation in receptor–ligand distribution and the non‐equilibrium dynamics of the receptor–ligand interactions in the loops.
Pituitary cell aggregates prepared from 14-day-old male or female rats and maintained for 4-5 days in culture were superfused with LHRH during periods of 20 or 90 min. LHRH provoked a rapid and sustained rise of PRL release at concentrations similar to those stimulating LH release (10(-11)-10(-8) M). Dopamine, at a concentration inhibiting PRL release for 90%, weakened but did not prevent this stimulation. LHRH also stimulated PRL release in aggregates prepared from adult male rat pituitary cells, but the effect was weaker and seen only after a more prolonged period in culture. There was no PRL response to LHRH in aggregates of lactotroph-enriched populations, obtained by gradient sedimentation at unit gravity, in which only few and small gonadotrophs are present. When a lactotroph-enriched/gonadotroph-poor population was coaggregated with a highly enriched population of large gonadotrophs, LHRH very effectively stimulated PRL release, the extent of stimulation being dependent on the proportional number of gonadotrophs in the coculture. Superfusion of lactotroph-enriched/gonadotroph-poor aggregates with medium in which the gonadotroph-enriched aggregates had previously been incubated for 3 h with 1 nM LHRH (gonadotroph-conditioned medium) also provoked a clear-cut rise in PRL release. This effect was not due to LH, FSH, or the small amounts of PRL present in the gonadotroph-conditioned medium. The LHRH antagonist [D-Phe2-D-Ala6]LHRH was capable of blocking the PRL response to LHRH but not that to the gonadotroph-conditioned medium. In the lactotroph-gonadotroph coaggregates TRH stimulated PRL release but had no effect on LH release. TRH was also ineffective in releasing LH or FSH in populations containing both gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs. The present data suggest that gonadotrophs can activate the secretory activity of the lacotrophs through the release of a paracrine humoral factor.
In the rat the hepatic branch of the nervus vagus stimulates proliferation of hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy and growth of bile duct epithelial cells after bile duct ligation. We studied the effect of hepatic vagotomy on the activation of the hepatic progenitor cell compartment in human and rat liver. The number of hepatic progenitor cells and atypical reactive ductular cells in transplanted (denervated) human livers with hepatitis was significantly lower than in innervated matched control livers and the number of oval cells in vagotomized rat livers with galactosamine hepatitis was significantly lower than in livers of sham-operated rats with galactosamine hepatitis. The expression of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1-M5 receptor) was studied by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. In human liver, immunoreactivity for M3 receptor was observed in hepatic progenitor cells, atypical reactive ductules, intermediate hepatocyte-like cells, and bile duct epithelial cells. mRNA for the M1-M3 and the M5 receptor, but not the M4 receptor, was detected in human liver homogenates. In conclusion, the hepatic vagus branch stimulates activation of the hepatic progenitor cell compartment in diseased liver, most likely through binding of acetylcholine to the M3 receptor expressed on these cells. These findings may be of clinical importance for patients with a transplant liver.
Reaggregate cell cultures of mouse or rat anterior pituitary were found to produce interleukin-6 (IL-6), a cytokine known for its multiple actions in the immune system. Studies on aggregates prepared from differentially enriched pituitary cell populations revealed the presence of folliculo-stellate (FS) cells to be essential for IL-6 production. Aggregates that contained only hormone-secreting, but no FS cells, failed to produce IL-6. Furthermore, the yield of IL-6 increased with increasing proportions of FS cells present in the aggregates. It is suggested that IL-6 participates in the local regulation of the secretory function of the hypophysis and may constitute a link between events in the immune system and those in the endocrine system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.