Primary sarcomas of the breast are extremely rare, with less than 0.1% of all malignant tumours of the breast. Mayo Clinic Surgical Pathology database was searched for all breast sarcoma from 1910 to 2000. Pathology reports and slides were reviewed and tumour types were determined. Metaplastic carcinomas and phyllodes tumours were excluded. There were 25 women ranging in age 24 -81 years (mean 45 years). All but one patient presented with a palpable lump. Mastectomy was performed in 19 patients and lumpectomy in five patients. Histopathological diagnoses were fibrosarcoma (six), angiosarcoma (six), pleomorphic sarcoma (six), leiomyosarcoma (two), myxofibrosarcoma (three), hemangiopericytoma (one) and osteosarcoma (one). Tumour size ranged from 0.3 to 12 cm (mean 5.7). Low-grade lesions were observed in 10 cases and high-grade in 15. Overall, mean follow-up was 10.5 years. Local recurrence was observed in 11 patients and ranged from 2 to 36 months (mean 15 m), while distant metastasis was observed in 10 patients (40%) affecting lungs, bones, liver, spleen, and skin. Of the 25 patients, 12 have died of disease and six of other causes. Five-year overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were 66 and 70%, respectively. OS and DFS at 5 years were 91% for tumours p5 cm and 50% for tumours 45 cm. Tumour size was significantly associated with OS (risk ratio ¼ 1.3 per 1 cm increase; 95% CI, 1.02 -1.7; P ¼ 0.036). There was no significant difference in OS or CSS between low-and high-grade lesions. In this series, tumour size was a more valuable prognostic factor than tumour grade. Primary sarcomas of the breast are rare, malignant tumours arising from the mesenchymal tissue of the mammary gland (Oberman, 1965;Barnes and Pietruszka, 1977;Callery et al, 1985), with an approximate incidence of 17 new cases per million women (Moore and Kinne, 1996). At the Mayo Clinic, 27 881 malignant breast tumours were seen between 1940 and 1999 (C Adem, personal unpublished data) and 18 breast sarcomas were diagnosed accounting for 0.0006% of breast malignancies.Breast sarcomas should be distinguished from metaplastic carcinomas (Adem et al, 2002). When facing a spindle cell neoplasm in an epithelial organ such as the breast one should be careful in rendering the diagnosis of sarcoma. In this setting, immunohistochemistry using the right antibodies is of major input. Berg et al defined stromal sarcomas of the breast in 1962 as a group of mesenchymal malignant tumours with fibrous, myxoid and adipose components, excluding malignant cystosarcoma phyllodes, lymphomas and angiosarcomas (Berg et al, 1962). However, series in the literature have included many different entities under the rubric of sarcomas such as cystosarcoma phyllodes, lymphosarcoma and carcinosarcoma (Botham et al, 1958;Donegan, 1967;Fawcett, 1967;Kennedy and Biggart, 1967;Rissanen and Holsti, 1968;Gogas et al, 1976;Ludgate et al, 1977;Khanna et al, 1981;Christensen et al, 1988;Terrier et al, 1989;Pitts et al, 1991;Ciatto et al, 1992;Luna Vega et al, 1992;McGregor et al,...

BACKGROUND BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations are associated with an increased risk of developing breast carcinoma. The authors hypothesized that the progression of breast neoplasia may differ between patients with hereditary disease and patients with nonhereditary disease and that this difference in progression may be visualized by studying the prevalence of precursor lesions and neoplastic lesions. METHODS The authors developed two case cohorts of high‐risk patients with a strong family history of breast carcinoma who underwent prophylactic mastectomy. The first cohort was comprised of women who underwent therapeutic mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, and the second cohort was comprised of women who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Patients without a family history of breast carcinoma who underwent unilateral or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy were selected as a control group. DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes was screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The available pathologic materials were reviewed independently by two pathologists, and all neoplastic and precursor lesions were identified and classified. Proliferation activity was assessed using MIB‐1 immunohistochemistry on all available lesions from the unilateral mastectomy cohort. RESULTS The 28 women from the unilateral cohort with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations had a lower prevalence of proliferative fibrocystic changes (PFC) (7%) compared with their matched control group (25%) (P = 0.075) and with patients who had a family history but no BRCA1/2 mutation (22–33%). None of the 11 deleterious mutation carriers from the bilateral cohort (0%) had PFC compared with 36% of women in the matched control group (P = 0.03). There was no major difference in the prevalence of other precursor lesions (including in situ carcinoma) in either cohort. Invasive carcinomas from the deleterious mutation carriers in the unilateral cohort were of higher grade compared with the control group (P = 0.003) and patients without a mutation (P < 0.0001) but were of similar grade compared with carriers of unclassified variant BRCA1/2 alterations (P = 0.20). Neoplastic lesions from the deleterious mutation carriers in the unilateral cohort had higher MIB‐1 proliferation indices compared with other patients with and without a family history of breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS The current data suggest that the progression rate of breast neoplasia is accelerated in women who carry BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations compared with other patients who have breast carcinoma with or without a family history. This increased progression rate should be taken into account when considering the surveillance of asymptomatic women. Cancer 2003;97:1–11. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11048

No abstract

Wide spectrum screening keratin may be the most useful and convenient antibody in differentiating metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma from other spindle cell lesions in the breast.

Breast cancer risk is greatly increased in women who carry mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Because breast cancer initiation is different between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women who do not carry mutations, it is possible that the mechanism of breast cancer progression is also different. Histopathologic and genetic studies have supported this hypothesis. To test this hypothesis further, we utilized a large cohort of women who underwent therapeutic mastectomy (TM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (PM). From this cohort, we developed case groups of women with a family history of breast cancer with BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations, with unclassified variant alterations, and with no detected mutation and matched these cases with sporadic controls from the same TM and PM cohort. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on paraffin sections by use of dual-color probes for ERBB2/CEP17, MYC/CEP8, TBX2/CEP17, and RPS6KB1/CEP17. All malignant and benign lesions, including putative precursor lesions, were studied. The invasive cancers from deleterious mutation carriers had a higher prevalence of duplication of MYC (P = 0.006) and TBX2 (P = 0.0008) compared to controls and a lower prevalence of ERBB2 amplification (P = 0.011). Coduplication of MYC and TBX2 was common in the in situ and invasive lesions from the deleterious mutation carriers. The odds ratio of having a BRCA1/2 mutation is 31.4 (95% CI = 1.7-569) when MYC and TBX2 are coduplicated but ERBB2 is normal. Unclassified variant carriers/no mutation detected and sporadic controls had a similar prevalence of alterations, suggesting that hereditary patients with no deleterious mutations follow a progression pathway similar to that of sporadic cases. With the exception of one atypical ductal hyperplasia lesion, no putative precursor lesion showed any detectable alteration of the probes tested. There was no significant intratumoral heterogeneity of genetic alterations. Our data confirm that a specific pattern of genomic instability characterizes BRCA1/2-related cancers and that this pattern has implications for the biology of these cancers. Moreover, our current and previous results emphasize the interaction between phenotype and genotype in BRCA1/2-related breast cancers and that a combination of morphologic features and alterations of ERBB2, MYC, and TBX2 may better define mechanisms of tumor progression, as well as determine which patients are more likely to carry BRCA1/2 mutations.

Sporadic cancers and familial breast cancers are characterized by an increase in genetic instability. Little is known about whether mismatch repair defects accompany this genetic instability. We investigated invasive and/or in situ breast cancers from 30 women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations and unclassified variant BRCA1/2 alterations. Forty cases of sporadic breast cancers were also investigated, including 7 medullary carcinomas. Malignant and benign lesions were examined from all cases to better understand tumor progression. Automated immunohistochemistry, with antibodies directed against hMLH1 and hMSH2, was used to screen cases for possible mismatch repair defects. When loss of expression was noted, DNA ploidy was performed by cytomorphometry. DNA, after laser microdissection, was extracted from a majority of familial cases and their corresponding controls, and microsatellite instability analysis was performed. None of the familial or sporadic cases had loss of hMSH2 expression. All but one lesion, a DCIS arising in a deleterious BRCA2 mutation carrier, had loss of hMLH1 expression and a tetraploid profile by image cytomorphometry. There was no MSI in any explored lesions (n ‫؍‬ 34), as determined by molecular analysis, including the DCIS with loss of hMLH1 expression. We conclude that DNA mismatch repair defects involving hMLH1 and hMSH2 underexpression are extremely rare events in sporadic and familial breast cancer. Mismatch repair gene mutations may be secondary random events in breast cancer progression. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Key words: BRCA1/2; medullary carcinoma; hMLH1; hMSH2; genetic instabilityGenetic instability in the form of MIN is common in solid tumors. The MIN phenotype is often detected by the presence of MSI. Mutations in the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes, which are involved in DNA mismatch repair, can be a cause of MSI. These mutations also cause HNPCC. 1 Tumors arising in these patients have specific clinical and pathologic features, such as a better prognosis and a heavy lymphoid infiltrate. At the molecular level, these tumors also have a high frequency of MSI. Previous studies in colon cancer have shown high correlation between the presence of MSI and loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression, as determined by immunohistochemistry. 2-4 Such tumors are also usually diploid. 5,6 However, CIN characterizes aneuploid tumors with chromosomal gains and losses. 7 CIN tumors rarely exhibit MSI.While breast cancer has been excluded as one of the extracolonic cancers that contribute to the HNPCC phenotype, 8 medullary carcinomas and breast cancers from deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers share some characteristic clinical and pathologic features with the HNPCC-related cancers. They have a favorable prognosis and often a dense lymphoid infiltrate. 9 We assessed the incidence of mismatch repair gene mutations in hereditary and sporadic breast cancers, including medullary carcinomas. We hypothesized that mismatch gene repair mutations might explain these morphologic similarities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Pati...

Determining the primary origin of skin metastases might be a challenging issue for pathologists, especially when there is no primary history or when this history is unavailable. The poor specificity of morphological appreciation is challenging, emphasizing the need for ancillary studies. We have retrieved 44 cases of skin metastases from our pathology files. Paraffin blocks were collected and homemade tissue arrays were made. We have tried to assess the primary origin based on morphological data alone, and then using 13 antibodies (cytokeratins (CK) 5/6, 7, 19, 20, thyroid transcription factor-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, PS100, tumor-associated glycoprotein 72, BerEP4, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), CD10, and E-cadherin). Most metastases in our series were from breast (13) and colorectal cancers (six) as they are the main clinical activity in our hospital. Only 44% of cases were correctly assessed based on the sole morphology, emphasizing the need for ancillary studies. CK 20, ER, and PR were the most helpful markers to determine the primary origin of skin metastases by highlighting colorectal origin and mammary origin, respectively. By far, clinical information and morphological evaluation are more reliable than the use of ancillary techniques, which have to be used in the absence of the former one and the poor differentiation of the latter ones. Azoulay S, Adem C, Le Pelletier F, Barete S, Francès C, Capron F. Skin metastases from unknown origin: role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of cutaneous metastases of carcinoma of unknown origin.

No abstract