Objective
To assess if a computerised decision support system reliably identified abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns in fetuses with adverse neonatal outcomes in the INFANT trial, and whether its use reduced substandard care.
Design
Prospective cohort study within a randomised controlled trial.
Setting
Twenty‐four maternity units in the UK and Ireland.
Population or sample
A total of 46 614 labours between January 6 2010 and August 31 2013 in the INFANT trial.
Methods
Panel review of intrapartum and neonatal care in infants with adverse outcome, and an assessment of the effectiveness of computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate in reducing substandard care. Descriptive analysis of other factors associated with adverse outcome.
Main outcome measures
Incidence and detection rate of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, other characteristics associated with perinatal adverse outcome, and frequency of substandard care.
Results
Computer interpretation of FHR patterns was deemed to be completely valid in only 24 of 71 (33.8%) cases of adverse outcome. On a scale of 0–10 (completely invalid to completely valid), 28 cases (39.4%) had a score of 6 or less, mainly due to lack of recognition of decelerations (15 cases), or reduced variability (seven cases), or failure to recognise tachysystole (five cases). There were multiple associated factors that modified the clinical assessment of FHR patterns. There was substandard care in 45/71 cases (63%).
Conclusion
A significant proportion of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns were not detected accurately by computer analysis, and its use did not reduce the incidence of substandard care.
Funding
UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 06.38.01).
Tweetable abstract
Improved recognition of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns is insufficient to reduce the incidence of substandard care.
(Abstracted from BJOG 2019;126:1354–1361)
During the 1960s and 1970s, intermittent auscultation was replaced by the alternative method of continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) and cardiotocography (electronic monitoring of the fetal heart rate [FHR] and uterine contractions, or CTG). Meta-analyses have reported a 59% drop in intrapartum deaths attributable to hypoxia and a reduced risk of neonatal seizures, but a 2017 Cochrane review concluded that while EFM did reduce the rates of neonatal seizures, it did not provide “clear differences in cerebral palsy, infant mortality, or other standard measures of neonatal well-being.” Human error in interpreting the FHR pattern is a possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of EFM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.