Soil ingestion can be a major route of human exposure to many immobile soil contaminants. The present risk assessment is based on toxicity studies in which contaminants are typically ingested in liquid or food matrices. The difference in bioavailability of contaminants ingested in a soil matrix is not taken into account. To become bioavailable, contaminants first need to become bioaccessible, i.e., they must be mobilized from the soil during digestion. Soil contaminants may be less bioaccessible than contaminants from liquid or food, so that the risks can be overestimated. This article describes the development of an in vitro human digestion model that is physiologically based. It can be used as a tool to assess bioaccessibility. We explain the rationale behind the experimental design of the model. We address the aspects of the simulated compartments of the gastrointestinal tract, temperature, soil-to-fluid ratio, ratio of digestive juices, transit times, centrifugation, pH values, mixing, constituents and their concentrations, and bile. The optimized in vitro digestion model was applied in a case study. The bioaccessibility of lead in pottery flakes with glazing was determined and compared to the bioaccessibility of lead in the soil from which the pottery flakes were removed. The data indicate that pottery flake lead is considerably less bioaccessible (0.3 +/- 0.2%) than lead in soil without pottery flakes (42-66% at the same site, and 28-73% at other sites in the same town). Furthermore, bioaccessibility values of lead in soil appear to be less than calculated bioaccessibility values for dietary lead (which are based on the criterion used by the Dutch risk assessment and on literature absorption data). This indicates that accounting for the matrix of ingestion can affect the exposure assessment for lead. The in vitro digestion model is a promising tool for studying the effect of the ingestion matrix on bioaccessibility.
Despite a number of studies on noise-induced health effects, it is still unclear to what extent different neuroendocrine pathways are affected by noise exposure. Male Wistar rats were housed in sound-attenuated rooms isolated for noise from outside. Three groups of chronically cannulated rats were exposed to either background noise (±64 dB) only or irregular experimental white noise (90 dB, 2-22 kHz). Two protocols, with approximately the same total amount of noise but with different densities, were used: protocol N1 (180 min random noise per day for 18 days) or protocol N2 (540 min random noise per day for 8 days). Basal levels of circulating hormones (ACTH, corticosterone, prolactin and catecholamines) and plasma glucose were measured. In control animals, no significant changes in any of these parameters were observed over 18 days. Except for plasma prolactin, N1 did not induce a significant elevation in basal hormonal levels. N2 however induced significant elevation in basal prolactin, corticosterone and noradrenaline levels. At the end of the exposure period, all animals were subjected to a novel heterotypic stressor (restraint stress) to monitor differences in neuroendocrine activation (ACTH, corticosterone and prolactin). Compared to nonexposed control animals, N1 animals showed a normal ACTH and an enhanced corticosterone response, whereas N2 animals showed an increased ACTH but a normal corticosterone response. The prolactin response of both Nl and N2 animals was significantly decreased. Adrenal cell suspension experiments revealed that in noise-exposed rats both basal- and ACTH-stimulated corticosterone production were significantly increased as compared to control animals. These results indicate that chronic noise exposure at mild intensities induces subtle but significant changes in hormonal regulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.