We report a comparative immunofluorescence and immunoblotting study of GFA protein, the subunit of glial filaments, in nonmammalian vertebrates. The study was conducted with polyclonal antibodies raised to human and shark antigen and with monoclonal antibodies isolated from mice immunized with chicken and bovine antigen. With the exception of cyclostomes, glial filaments appeared remarkably conserved in vertebrate phylogeny, both with respect to the molecular weight and immunoreactivity of their protein subunit. In most species, the antibodies decorated a single band in brain, spinal cord, and optic nerve extracts by the immunoblotting procedure. This band had the same molecular weight in the different CNS regions. With the exception of the turtle, species differences in the molecular weight of the band were not greater than those observed among mammalian vertebrates (human, bovine, and rat). However, there were some exceptional findings in fish. In goldfish and trout brain and spinal cord extracts, the antibodies decorated with the same intensity two bands. In accordance with previous immunofluorescence findings, goldfish optic nerve extracts were negative by the immunoblotting procedure. In four fishes (sea bass, tautog, trout, and scup), optic nerves reacted with the antibodies. However, the band decorated by the antibodies was higher in molecular weight than that obtained from brain and spinal cord extracts. Glial fibers were demonstrated by immunofluorescence in the brain, spinal cord, optic nerve, and retina of most species studied. In amphibia immunofluorescent structures were comparatively few, probably accounting for the negative results by immunoblotting. A comparative immunohistological study of the cerebellum showed the presence of perpendicular glial fibers in the molecular layer of most species examined. Birds and amphibia were different in this respect. Bergmann glia in chicken were GFA negative. In the frog and the toad, immunofluorescent fibers in the molecular layer of the cerebellum were haphazardly oriented. Ependymal radial glia was GFA-negative in the cerebellum of subavian vertebrates. Antisera raised in rabbit to shark GFA protein reacted with the same bovine GFA fragments recognized by polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies raised to human and bovine antigens, respectively, i.e., 30-kDa N-bromosuccinimide fragment (tryptophan cleavage); 35-kDa 2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid fragment (cysteine cleavage); 18-kDa cyanogen bromide fragment (methionine cleavage). Conversely, the chicken GFA monoclonal antibodies selected for this study only reacted with noncleaved protein.
Monoclonal antibodies selectively reacting with the high molecular weight neurofilament proteins (NF 150K and NF 200K) on immunoblots of bovine spinal cord extracts were obtained upon immunization of mice with chicken brain antigen and with highly purified NF 150K or NF 200K isolated from bovine spinal cord by anion exchange chromatography. Antibodies reacting with NF 200K or with both NF 150K and NF 200K were selected for this study. The antibodies were screened on immunoblots for reactivity with phosphorylated epitopes by dilution of the supernatants in sodium potassium phosphate as well as by treatment of nitrocellulose transfers with alkaline phosphatase. Abolishment of staining under these conditions was taken as evidence of reactivity with phosphorylated epitopes. With phosphate/phosphatase-sensitive antibodies, NF 200K immunoreactivity was a late event in rat optic nerve development. It was first observed at day 18 on immunoblots of sodium dodecyl sulfate extracts analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Conversely, with phosphate/phosphatase-insensitive antibodies, NF 200K immunoreactivity was already present on day 10, the earliest age in this study. With one monoclonal reacting with phosphorylated NF 150K and NF 200K, NF 150K immunoreactivity was already present on day 10. It is proposed that NF 200K expression precedes NF 200K phosphorylation in development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.