The Gafchromic EBT was recently introduced in film dosimetry for external beam therapy (EBT). The high spatial resolution, weak energy dependence, and near-tissue equivalence of EBT films make them suitable for measurement of dose distributions in radiotherapy, especially intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Starting with a sensitometric curve and dose uncertainty relative to the flatbed scanner, the goal of this study was to find an efficient method of correcting for light scattering, and to compare dose distribution supplied by Gafchromic EBT with the distribution obtained with a 2D ion-chamber detector system. Light scattering was analyzed for different levels of dose, and was found to depend on the red-scale value as well as the position of the pixel on the scanner. Many "uniform" films were exposed at different levels of dose to create a two-dimensional matrix correction to take this effect into account. The dose distribution obtained for three clinical beams (10 x 10, 15 x 15 cm open fields and 12 x 12 cm wedge 60 degrees field) were in agreement with those supplied by the 2D array. Gamma index <1 (using 5 mm distance and 5% dose as constraints) for the three fields considered was reached in an average of 98% of the points.

BackgroundRadiotherapy in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) is currently evolving with new attempts to further reduce radiation volumes to the involved-node concept (Involved Nodes Radiation Therapy, INRT) and with the use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Currently, IMRT can be planned and delivered with several techniques, and its role is not completely clear. We designed a planning study on a typical dataset drawn from clinical routine with the aim of comparing different IMRT solutions in terms of plan quality and treatment delivery efficiency.MethodsA total of 10 young female patients affected with early stage mediastinal HL and treated with 30 Gy INRT after ABVD-based chemotherapy were selected from our database. Five different treatment techniques were compared: 3D-CRT, VMAT (single arc), B-VMAT (“butterfly”, multiple arcs), Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and Tomodirect (TD). Beam energy was 6 MV, and all IMRT planning solutions were optimized by inverse planning with specific dose-volume constraints on OAR (breasts, lungs, thyroid gland, coronary ostia, heart). Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs) and Conformity Number (CN) were calculated and then compared, both for target and OAR by a statistical analysis (Wilcoxon’s Test).ResultsPTV coverage was reached for all plans (V95% ≥ 95%); highest mean CN were obtained with HT (0.77) and VMAT (0.76). B-VMAT showed intermediate CN mean values (0.67), while the lowest CN were obtained with TD (0.30) and 3D-CRT techniques (0.30). A trend of inverse correlation between higher CN and larger healthy tissues volumes receiving low radiation doses was shown for lungs and breasts. For thyroid gland and heart/coronary ostia, HT, VMAT and B-VMAT techniques allowed a better sparing in terms of both Dmean and volumes receiving intermediate-high doses compared to 3D-CRT and TD.ConclusionsIMRT techniques showed superior target coverage and OAR sparing, with, as an expected consequence, larger volumes of healthy tissues (lungs, breasts) receiving low doses. Among the different IMRT techniques, HT and VMAT showed higher levels of conformation; B-VMAT and HT emerged as the planning solutions able to achieve the most balanced compromise between higher conformation around the target and smaller volumes of OAR exposed to lower doses (typical of 3D-CRT).

The performances of the systems proved to be site specific, depending on the DVF type and the platforms and the procedures used at the various centers. The pelvis was the most challenging site for most of the algorithms, which failed to achieve sub-voxel accuracy. Improved reproducibility was observed among the centers using the same hybrid registration algorithm.

No abstract

No abstract