No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the utility of CT-MRI image fusion software and compare both prostate volume and localization with CT and MRI studies. We evaluated the differences in clinical volumes in patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. After several tests performed to ensure the quality of image fusion software, eight patients suffering from prostate adenocarcinoma were submitted to CT and MRI studies in the treatment position within an immobilization device before the start of radiotherapy. The clinical target volume (CTV) (prostate plus seminal vesicles) was delineated on CT and MRI studies and image fusion was obtained from the superimposition of anatomical fiducial markers. A comparison of dose-volume histograms relative to CTV, rectum, bladder and femoral heads was performed for both studies. Image fusion showed a mean overestimation of CTV of 34% with CT compared with MRI. Along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior direction, CTV was a mean 5 mm larger with CT study compared with MRI. The dose-volume histograms resulting from CT and MRI comparison showed that it is possible to spare a mean 10% of rectal volume and approximately 5% of bladder and femoral heads, respectively. This study confirmed an overestimation of CTV with CT images compared with MRI. Because this finding only allows a minimal sparing of organs at risk, considering the organ motion during each radiotherapy session and the excellent outcomes of prostate cancer treatment with CT based target identification, we are still reluctant to reduce the CTV to that identified by MRI.

No abstract

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has been previously investigated as an alternative to thoracic surgery in patients with a limited number of pulmonary nodules from different primary tumors. We here report the clinical outcomes of a series of consecutive patients homogenously selected and treated with single dose SABR in our Institution. Eligibility criteria were: 1-5 lung metastases, maximum tumor diameter 50 mm, absent or controlled extra-thoracic disease, adequate pulmonary function, no prior radiotherapy, performance status ECOG 0-1. All patients were treated with a single dose of 26 Gy prescribed to the months. Treated metastasis progression at SABR site was observed in 10 lesions (11.1%), and actuarial LC rates at 1 and 2 years were respectively 93.4% and 88.1%. Systemic failure occurred in 37 patients (55.2%) at a median interval of 8 months after SABR. PFS rates were 72% and 55.4% at 1 and 2 year. Seven patients had grade 1 (10.4%) and 8 grade 2-3 late radiological toxicity (11.9%), while 6 experienced late chest wall toxicity (2 rib fractures, 4 chronic chest pain, 8.9%). CSS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90% and 76%, while OS rates were 85.1% and 70.5%, respectively. Median survival time was 40 months. On multivariate analysis, a disease-free interval longer than 24 months was close to significance for a benefit in CSS (p 5 0.07; HR 0.34 [95% CI 0.1-1.12]). The study includes a cohort of patients treated with single fraction 26 Gy SABR followed for a prolonged time interval. Single fraction SABR appears to be an effective treatment option, with little observed acute toxicity and limited late toxicity (15%); its advantages also include a high patients' compliance, a short overall treatment time and an easy combination with systemic therapies. These results might provide supportive evidence to the use of single fraction SABR as a valid and acceptable alternative to surgery for pulmonary metastases from different primary tumors.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract