Having a baby while on dialysis is rare but not impossible, though early mortality remains high. There is a 'scale of probability' estimating that women on dialysis have a 10-fold lower probability of delivering a live-born baby than those who have undergone renal transplantation, who in turn have a 10-fold lower probability of delivering a live-born baby as compared with the overall population.
Eleven patients with Gitelman’s syndrome and 23 controls underwent acute administration of the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide and/or the loop diuretic furosemide (FUR) in order to indirectly evaluate the activity of the two electroneutral Na+/Cl--reabsorptive systems of the distal nephron, namely the thiazide-sensitive Na+-Cl- symporter of the distal convoluted tubule and the FUR-sensitive Na+-K+-2Cl- symporter of the loop of Henle. The patients were characterized by hypokalemia, mild metabolic alkalosis, hypomagnesemia, hypocalciuria, and reduced free water generation during maximally diluted diuresis which indicated reduced distal nephron NaCl reabsorption. The plasma Na and Cl levels were similar in patients and controls. Hydrochlorothiazide induced a significantly lower increase of urinary Na and Cl excretions in 6 patients with Gitelman’s syndrome than in 6 controls, indicating reduced NaCl reabsorption by the thiazide-sensitive Na+/Cl- symporter of the distal convoluted tubule in Gitelman’s syndrome. FUR induced a slightly higher increase of urinary Na and Cl excretions in 11 patients with Gitelman’s syndrome than in 17 controls, in keeping with reduced NaCl reabsorption in tubular sites past the loop of Henle during FUR effect or increased NaCl reabsorption in the loop itself (as a compensatory mechanism for NaCl-reabsorp-tive defect in the distal convoluted tubule) or both. Our results confirm that the functional activity of the renal thiazide-sensitive Na+-Cl- cotransporter (but not of the FUR-sensitive carrier) is deficient in patients with Gitelman’s syndrome, in keeping with the recently described genetic link between the syndrome and a wide variety of nonconservative mutations of the gene encoding the protein; it is suggested that dynamic studies with diuretic administration may be of diagnostic help in this condition.
Background: NxStage System One cycler (NSO) is a widespread system for home daily dialysis. Few data are available on the impact of this “low dialysate volumes system” on the removal rate of poorly diffusible, time-dependent solutes like β2-microglobulin (β2M). Methods: Single-session and weekly balances of β2M were performed and compared in 12 patients on daily NSO, 13 patients on standard high-flux bicarbonate dialysis (BHD), 5 patients on standard post-dilution on line hemodiafiltration (HDF), and 13 patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). Results: Intradialytic fall of plasma water β2M levels (corrected for rebound) was 65.2 ± 2.6% in HDF, 49.8 ± 9.1% in BHD, and 32.3 ± 6.4% in NSO (p < 0.001 between all groups). Single treatment dialysate removal was much less in APD (19.4 ± 20.4 mg, p < 0.001) than in any extracorporeal technologies, and was less in NSO (126.2 ± 35.6 mg, p < 0.001) than in BHD (204.9 ± 53.4 mg) and HDF (181.9 ± 37.6 mg), with no differences between the latter 2; however weekly removal was higher in NSO (757.3 ± 213.7 mg, p < 0.04) than in BHD (614.8 ± 160.3 mg) and HDF (545.8 ± 112.8 mg). Extrapolated β2M adsorption to the membrane was negligible in BHD, 14.7 ± 9.5% of total removal in HDF and 18.3 ± 18.5% in NSO. Integration of single session data into a weekly efficiency indicator (K × t) showed total volume of plasma cleared in NSO (33.4 ± 7.7 L/week) to be higher than in BHD (26.9 ± 7.2 L/week, p < 0.01) and not different than in HDF (36.2 ± 4.7 L/week); it was negligible (3.2 ± 1.0) in APD. Conclusions: Weekly β2M removal efficiency proved equal and highest in HDF and NSO (at a 6/week prescription), slightly lesser in BHD and lowest in APD.
Background: Short frequent dialysis with NxStage System One cycler (NSO) has become increasingly popular as home hemodialysis prescription. Short dialysis sessions with NSO might not allow adequate phosphate (P) removal. Methods: Single-session and weekly balances of P and calcium (Ca) were compared in 14 patients treated with NSO (6 sessions/week) and in 14 patients on standard bicarbonate dialysis (BHD). Results: NSO and BHD showed similar plasma P fall, with end-dialysis plasma P slightly lower in BHD (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.8 mg/dL, p < 0.02). Single-session P removal was lower in NSO, but weekly removal was higher (3,488 ± 1,181 mg vs. 2,634 ± 878, p < 0.003). Plasma Ca increase was lower in NSO, with similar PTH fall. Ca balance varied according to start plasma Ca, dialysate to blood Ca gradient and net ultrafiltration. Conclusions: short, frequent home hemodialysis with NSO, on a 6/week-based prescription, allows higher weekly P removal than BHD. With the dialysate Ca concentration in use (6 mg/dL), total plasma Ca and iCa concentration increase is lower in NSO.
Serum ferritin (SF) and erythrocyte ferritin (EF) were evaluated in 35 patients on chronic hemodialysis treatment (CHD), in 45 healthy subjects and in 22 nonnephropathic females with iron deficiency anemia. Twenty-five CHD patients with basal SF < 500 μg/l were treated orally with 200 mg of Fe2+ for 2 months and the positive (hemoglobin increase > 1 g/dl) or negative response to the therapy was correlated to the basal levels of SF and EF. Three groups of CHD patients could be defined on the basis of their basal SF levels (hypo-, normo- or hyperferritinemic). Nine patients with increased SF levels had also EF levels significantly higher than the other CHD patients and controls since they were probably iron-overloaded. In the other 2 groups of CHD patients, EF levels were significantly higher than in controls for each level of SF probably because of the reduced utilization of iron by uremic bone marrow. Among the 25 treated CHD patients, only 5 responded to the therapy: 3 were hypoferritinemic while the other 2 responders had basal SF within the normal range. Four hypoferritinemic patients did not respond to the therapy. Four out of five responders had the lowest EF levels among CHD patients. EF measurement could be an important and useful test in detecting the presence of an iron deficiency erythropoiesis in CHD patients.
The effects of increasing amounts of uremic sera (US) on the growth of erythroid progenitor cells [burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E)] collected from peripheral blood of normal subjects were evaluated to assess the potential role of uremic inhibitors of erythropoiesis during a treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEpo). US were collected from 8 patients on regular dialysis with marked anemia (Hb 6 ± 0.5 g%) before and after a treatment with high doses of r-HuEpo (from 300 to 525 U/kg/week). Standard cultures for BFU-E were performed in a-metylcellulose with fetal calf serum (FCS) and 4 U/ml of r-HuEpo (Cilag, Ortho). In successive cultures, US were added at increasing amounts to the standard culture in order to assess a possible inhibitory effect on BFU-E growth. Finally, in order to assess a possible lack of stimulatory factors, we partially substituted FCS with US. The addition of US collected either before or after therapy with r-HuEpo to the standard culture had no effect on the growth of BFU-E. Vice versa, the number of cultured BFU-E decreased when FCS was partially substituted with US collected before r-HuEpo. This effect was not evident when FCS was partially substituted with US collected after r-HuEpo. No significant differences were recorded in the tested sera collected before and after therapy considering erythropoietin levels and amino acid levels. We hypothesized that some other factors with erythropoietic stimulatory activity (burst-promoting activity?) may be deficient in uremic patients with marked anemia and can be induced during therapy with r-HuEpo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.