Residual vein thrombosis (RVT) indicates

The aim of this study was to evaluate different durations of treatment in patients with calf venous thrombosis (CVT) involving 1 or more deep veins. The authors studied 2 groups of patients with postsurgical CVT diagnosed by echo-color Doppler. The first group consisted of 68 patients with CVT involving a single vein, and the second group consisted of 124 patients with CVT involving 2 or more veins. Immediately after diagnosis, all patients were treated with nadroparin calcium and sodium warfarin. Heparin treatment was withdrawn after 5-6 days of treatment, when the international normalized ratio (INR) was stabilized between 2 and 3. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups receiving anticoagulation treatment for 6 or 12 weeks, respectively. The endpoint was proximal extension of the thrombotic lesion, defined as the extension of the thrombus to the popliteal and/or femoral vein. In patients with single-vessel CVT there was no significant difference between the 2 subgroups, whereas in patients with CVT involving 2 or more vessels, a statistically significant difference was observed, the number of cases showing proximal extension of the thrombus being higher among patients treated for 6 weeks. Twelve weeks of anticoagulation treatment is better than 6 weeks only in patients with postsurgical CVT involving 2 or more veins.

To date, the virtual multidisciplinary tumor boards (vMTBs) are increasingly used to achieve high-quality treatment recommendations across health-care regions, which expands and develops the local MTB team to a regional or national expert network. This review describes the process of lung cancer-specific MTBs and the transition process from face-to-face tumor boards to virtual ones. The review also focuses on the project organization's description, advantages, and disadvantages. Semi-structured interviews identified five major themes for MTBs: current practice, attitudes, enablers, barriers, and benefits for the MTB. MTB teams exhibited positive responses to modeled data feedback. Virtualization reduces time spent for travel, allowing easier and timely patient discussions. This process requires a secure web platform to assure the respect of patients' privacy and presents the same unanswered prob-

No abstract

Background/Aim: Upper limb breast cancerrelated lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic and severe condition affecting a significant percentage of breast cancer survivors. Even though its physiopathology is well-known, there is no worldwide consensus on BCRL evaluation and a goldstandard treatment. This narrative review aims at providing a brief descriptive overview with regard to BCRL treatment modalities. Materials and Methods: We conducted a literature search within the PubMed database, and 33 articles out of 56 were selected, including reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses aiming find the most updated evidence regarding BCRL treatment modalities. Results: Physical exercise (aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, aquatic therapy), bandages, and intermittent pneumatic compression were shown to be most effective in BCRL patients, in terms of swelling reduction in the acute-intensive phase. Furthermore, physical exercise was beneficial also as a maintenance tool. Manual lymphatic drainage demonstrated efficacy in preventing secondary lymphedema if applied immediately after breast cancer surgery or in early phases of BCRL or as a maintenance tool. Complementary procedures such as acupuncture, reflexology, yoga and photo-biomodulation therapy did not show conclusive results in BCRL treatment. Surgery was shown effective in managing symptoms (liposuction), preventing (lymphaticovenular anastomosis) and treating BCRL (vascularized lymph node transfer). Conclusion: BCRL is still a challenging condition either for breast cancer survivors and clinicians, deeply impacting patient functioning and quality of life. Due to the lack of globally accepted criteria in evaluating BCRL, to date a gold standard treatment for this widespread issue is still needed.Improved survival rates in breast cancer patients contribute to an increased number of survivors complaining of upper limb Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL), which is a secondary lymphedema after surgery and radiation therapy (1). BCRL is a common complication occurring after lymph node dissection for breast or upper limb tumors (e.g., melanoma), and it is generally caused by an excessive accumulation of protein-rich fluid (lymph) in tissue extracellular spaces that causes transient or persistent soft tissue swelling (2). Up to 30% (3-5) of breast cancer survivors, may suffer from BCRL and its physical and psychological consequences such as: pain, pitting edema, upper limb heaviness and discomfort, decreased range of motion of the affected joints, recurrent skin infections and ulcers, elephantiasis, cutaneous angiosarcoma, depression, anxiety, body image-related disorder. Quality of life (QoL) is dramatically worsened by BCRL.