Magnetic resonance imaging clearly identifies the anterolateral ligament of the knee in slightly more than half of cases, being partially visible in most of them. In all cases, a tibial insertion is characterized.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained typing errors. The words 'thickness' and 'width' were switched. Find bellow the corrections:Page 1, Results section of Abstract A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm, thickness of 5.6 mm, and width of 1.9 mm. Where it should have read as: A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm, width of 5.6 mm, and thickness of 1.9 mm. Page 4, First paragraph of Reading parameters and statistical analyses of Results A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm (range, 24.1-39.9 mm), thickness 5.6 mm (range, 4.4-7.1 mm), and width 1.9 mm (range, 1.2-2.5 mm). Where it should have read as:A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm (range, 24.1-39.9 mm), width 5.6 mm (range, 4.4-7.1 mm), and thickness 1.9 mm (range, 1.2-2.5 mm). Page 6, Table 1 ALL thickness (mm) 5.6 (4.4-7.1) 5.2 (3.5-6.2) ALL width (mm) 1.9 (1.2-2.5) 1.8 (1.0-2.8) Where it should have read as: ALL width (mm) 5.6 (4.4-7.1) 5.2 (3.5-6.2) ALL thickness (mm) 1.9 (1.2-2.5) 1.8 (1.0-2.8) Page 7, First paragraph of last page of Discussion A completely visible ALL on MRI had a mean length of 33.2 mm, thickness of 5.6 mm, and width of 1.9 mm. Where it should have read as: A completely visible ALL on MRI had a mean length of 33.2 mm, width of 5.6 mm, and thickness of 1.9 mm.The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx

No abstract

No abstract