Erratum to: MRI features of the anterolateral ligament of the knee

Abstract

The original version of this article unfortunately contained typing errors. The words 'thickness' and 'width' were switched. Find bellow the corrections:Page 1, Results section of Abstract A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm, thickness of 5.6 mm, and width of 1.9 mm. Where it should have read as: A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm, width of 5.6 mm, and thickness of 1.9 mm. Page 4, First paragraph of Reading parameters and statistical analyses of Results A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm (range, 24.1-39.9 mm), thickness 5.6 mm (range, 4.4-7.1 mm), and width 1.9 mm (range, 1.2-2.5 mm). Where it should have read as:A completely visible ligament had a mean length of 33.2 mm (range, 24.1-39.9 mm), width 5.6 mm (range, 4.4-7.1 mm), and thickness 1.9 mm (range, 1.2-2.5 mm). Page 6, Table 1 ALL thickness (mm) 5.6 (4.4-7.1) 5.2 (3.5-6.2) ALL width (mm) 1.9 (1.2-2.5) 1.8 (1.0-2.8) Where it should have read as: ALL width (mm) 5.6 (4.4-7.1) 5.2 (3.5-6.2) ALL thickness (mm) 1.9 (1.2-2.5) 1.8 (1.0-2.8) Page 7, First paragraph of last page of Discussion A completely visible ALL on MRI had a mean length of 33.2 mm, thickness of 5.6 mm, and width of 1.9 mm. Where it should have read as: A completely visible ALL on MRI had a mean length of 33.2 mm, width of 5.6 mm, and thickness of 1.9 mm.The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx

Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament using interlinked hamstrings – technical note

“…Helito et al 12 showed that the ALL is fully visualized in 71.7% of the MRIs. In turn, Taneja et al 13 have identified the full ALL view in 11%.…”