One-third of all hospital-regulated medical waste (RMW) comes from the operating room (OR), and it considerably consists of disposable packaging and wrapping materials for the sterilization of surgical instruments. This study sought to identify the amount and type of waste produced by ORs in order to reduce the RMW so as to achieve environmentally-friendly waste management in the OR. We performed an initial waste segregation of 4 total knee replacement arthroplasties (TKRAs) and 1 total hip replacement arthroplasty, and later of 1 extra TKRA, 1 laparoscopic anterior resection of the colon, and 1 pelviscopy (with radical vaginal hysterectomy), performed at our OR. The total mass of non-regulated medical waste (non-RMW) and blue wrap amounted to 30.5 kg (24.9%), and that of RMW to 92.1 kg (75.1%). In the course of the study, we noted that the non-RMW included recyclables, such as papers, plastics, cardboards, and various wrapping materials. The study showed that a reduction in RMW generation can be achieved through the systematic segregation of OR waste.
BackgroundIntravenous (IV) dexamethasone prolongs the duration of a peripheral nerve block; however, there is little available information about its optimal effective dose. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different doses of IV dexamethasone on the duration of postoperative analgesia to determine the optimal effective dose for a sciatic nerve block.MethodsPatients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were randomly assigned to receive normal saline or IV dexamethasone (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg). An ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed using 0.75% ropivacaine (20 ml) before general anesthesia. The duration of postoperative analgesia was the primary outcome, and pain scores, use of rescue analgesia, onset time, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction were assessed as secondary outcomes.ResultsCompared with the control group, the postoperative analgesic duration of the sciatic nerve block was prolonged in groups receiving IV dexamethasone 10 mg (P < 0.001), but not in the groups receiving IV dexamethasone 2.5 mg or 5 mg. The use of rescue analgesics was significantly different among the four groups 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.001) and similar thereafter. However, pain scores were not significantly different among the four groups 24 h postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes among the four groups.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that compared to the controls, only IV dexamethasone 10 mg increased the duration of postoperative analgesia following a sciatic nerve block for foot and ankle surgery without the occurrence of adverse events.
Interscalene brachial plexus block provides effective anesthesia and analgesia for shoulder surgery. One of the disadvantages of this technique is the risk of hemidiaphragmatic paresis, which can occur as a result of phrenic nerve block and can cause a decrease in the pulmonary function, limiting the use of the block in patients with reduced functional residual capacity or a preexisting pulmonary disease. However, it is generally transient and is resolved over the duration of the local anesthetic's action.We present a case of a patient who experienced prolonged hemidiaphragmatic paresis following a continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for the postoperative pain management of shoulder surgery, and suggest a mechanism that may have led to this adverse effect.Nerve injuries associated with peripheral nerve blocks may be caused by several mechanisms. Our findings suggest that perioperative nerve injuries can occur as a result of combined mechanical and chemical injuries.
BackgroundThis study was designed to determine the optimal anesthetic depth for the maintenance and recovery in interventional neuroradiology.MethodsEighty-eight patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology were randomly allocated to light anesthesia (n = 44) or deep anesthesia (n = 44) groups based on the value of the bispectral index (BIS). Anesthesia was induced with propofol, alfentanil, and rocuronium and maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane. The concentration of sevoflurane was titrated to maintain BIS at 40-49 (deep anesthesia group) or 50-59 (light anesthesia group). Phenylephrine was used to maintain the mean arterial pressure within 20% of preinduction values. Recovery times were recorded.ResultsThe light anesthesia group had a more rapid recovery to spontaneous ventilation, eye opening, extubation, and orientation (4.1 ± 2.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.8 min, 6.9 ± 3.2 min vs. 9.1 ± 3.2 min, 8.2 ± 3.1 min vs. 10.7 ± 3.3 min, 10.0 ± 3.9 min vs. 12.9 ± 5.5 min, all P < 0.01) compared to the deep anesthesia group. The use of phenylephrine was significantly increased in the deep anesthesia group (768 ± 184 vs. 320 ± 82 µg, P < 0.01). More patients moved during the procedure in the light anesthesia group (6/44 [14%] vs. 0/44 [0%], P = 0.026).ConclusionsBIS values between 50 and 59 for interventional neuroradiology were associated with a more rapid recovery and favorable hemodynamic response, but also with more patient movement. We suggest that maintaining BIS values between 40 and 49 is preferable for the prevention of patient movement during anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology.
Rationale: Bilateral brachial plexus block (BPB) generally requires a relatively large dose of local anesthetic for a successful block, resulting in a high risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. It can also result in inadvertent bilateral phrenic nerve palsy, leading to respiratory failure. Hence, it has not been widely used. However, it can be performed in selected patients. In this report, we present a case of ultrasound-guided BPB for bilateral upper extremity surgery in a patient with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Patient concerns: A 25-year-old woman with SCI secondary to traumatic fifth cervical spine fracture scheduled for surgical treatment of bilateral elbow fracture received bilateral BPB. Diagnoses: Due to the complications of SCI, the patient had incomplete sensory loss, loss of motor function, and complete diaphragmatic paralysis on the right side. Interventions: Right infraclavicular and left axillary BPB was performed as the sole anesthetic procedure for bilateral upper extremity surgery. Outcomes: Bilateral BPB was successful for bilateral upper extremity surgery. The surgery was uneventful and without further complications. Lessons: Patients with cervical SCI have a high risk of respiratory complications. Bilateral BPB can be a suitable option for bilateral upper extremity surgery in selected patients. It is imperative to select an appropriate anesthetic technique that preserves respiratory function to minimize the potential risk of respiratory complications.
Background: Shoulder rotation has been shown to increase the acoustic window of ultrasound for thoracic epidural access. However, this effect of shoulder rotation has not yet been confirmed in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of shoulder rotation on the thoracic epidural blockade in patients with acute or chronic pain in the thoracic region. Study Design: Prospective crossover trial. Setting: Pain clinic of our university in the Republic of Korea. Methods: Forty patients aged 20 – 80 years with acute or chronic pain in the thoracic region who were scheduled to undergo thoracic epidural blockade more than twice. Interventions: The patients underwent repeated fluoroscopy-guided thoracic epidural blockade via the paramedian approach in the lateral decubitus position either with or without shoulder rotation. The primary outcome measure was the attempt time to the confirmed spread of contrast. The number of attempts, total procedure time, vertical interpedicular distance, contrast spreading length, and complications were compared between the 2 positions. Results: The median attempt times in the lateral decubitus and shoulder rotation positions were 138.8 and 132.5 seconds, respectively, and this difference was significant (P = 0.004). Compared with the lateral decubitus position, the shoulder rotation position was also associated with a significantly lower number of attempts (P = 0.03), shorter total procedure time (P < 0.001), and greater vertical interpedicular and contrast spreading distances (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). Limitations: The operator in this study was not blinded to the patient groups. Other researchers observed the operator’s procedure and evaluated and recorded the data in an attempt to overcome this bias. However, it was difficult to completely avoid the bias. Second, epidural blockade was performed at various levels (T3–11), and the anatomical features vary among thoracic spine levels. Conclusions: The study findings demonstrate the clinical benefits of the shoulder rotation position versus the lateral decubitus position in terms of successful epidural access during thoracic epidural blockade using the paramedian approach. Key words: contrast spreading length, fluoroscopy, lateral decubitus position, paramedian approach, shoulder rotation, thoracic epidural blockade, vertical interpedicular distance
Epidural hematoma after epidural block is a rare complication in healthy patients without risk factor. However, this rare disease can lead to neurological symptoms or paralysis. It is usually treated with surgical drainage. Herein we report a case of acute thoracic epidural hematoma associated with neurologic symptoms after epidural block in a healthy male without risk factors. We performed drainage of the epidural hematoma using 18-gauge Tuohy needle without surgical intervention. The patient's neurological symptoms and pain were relieved. He was discharged without sequelae. CASE REPORTA 73-year-old male patient who visited with intermittent intolerable sharp and lancinating pain over the left anterior chest wall and the back for one month. He received 300 mg/day of gabapentin and 1,500 mg/day of valacyclovir orally for 7 days following diagnosis with acute herpes zoster at a local private clinic. The patient did not have any unusual history, including family history and surgical history. He had no systemic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and so on.His height and weight were 172 cm and 59 kg, respectively.Results of his blood tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and platelet count all showed normal ranges.Physical examination revealed allodynia and hyperalgesia over the left T4 and T5 dermatomes. He complained severe pain in the affected area with a score of 8 or 9 on visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 indicated "no pain" and 10 indicated "the strongest pain imaginable." In particular, he was unable to sleep at night due to severe pain which interfered with his daily life.Under the diagnosis of post-herpetic neuralgia, the patient ■Case Report■
Rationale: Psoas compartment block (PCB) is typically performed using surface anatomical landmarks and neurostimulation for guidance. However, anatomical anomalies, such as scoliosis, make this technique unreliable, posing a challenge for the anesthesiologist when inducing regional anesthesia. Patient concerns: A 69-year-old woman with lumbar scoliosis scheduled for total hip arthroplasty underwent PCB with catheterization. Diagnoses: Inadvertent epidural anesthesia with catheterization following PCB was diagnosed using a lumbar radiograph. Interventions: Due to hypotension induced by local anesthetic (LA) epidural diffusion, the patient received intravenous hydration and vasopressor. Since bilateral sensory block was noted at the T3 level, with an incomplete motor blockade in both legs, the surgery was performed under epidural anesthesia. Outcomes: The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the duration of the surgical procedure. The surgery was uneventful and without further complications. Lessons: Patients with lumbar scoliosis are highly at risk of LA epidural diffusion, following PCB using traditional landmark-based approach. Other nerve-localizing technique can minimize the risk of this complication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.