2015
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimal anesthetic depth for interventional neuroradiology: comparisons between light anesthesia and deep anesthesia

Abstract: BackgroundThis study was designed to determine the optimal anesthetic depth for the maintenance and recovery in interventional neuroradiology.MethodsEighty-eight patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology were randomly allocated to light anesthesia (n = 44) or deep anesthesia (n = 44) groups based on the value of the bispectral index (BIS). Anesthesia was induced with propofol, alfentanil, and rocuronium and maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane. The concentration of sevoflurane was titrated to maintain BIS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal BIS level during surgery has been reported to be between 40–50 [16,19]. A finding of the present study was that the total doses of propofol and remifentanil administered during surgery were significantly lower in the BIS group compared with the non-BIS group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The optimal BIS level during surgery has been reported to be between 40–50 [16,19]. A finding of the present study was that the total doses of propofol and remifentanil administered during surgery were significantly lower in the BIS group compared with the non-BIS group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The etiology of susceptibility to propofol is complex, involving complicated associations among drugs, biological and psychological factors 6 . More importantly, genetic components could play an essential role in the pathogenesis of susceptibility to propofol 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general consensus to avoid nitrous oxide because of the risk of intravascular microbubbles during contrast injection [16]. It is desirable to assess the depth of anesthesia with cerebral neuromonitoring [30], but it is often not practical because of significantly disturbing imaging quality for the interventionalist. In addition, intraprocedural, INR patients are at high risk of hypothermia, and forced warming is needed [16].…”
Section: Intraprocedural Physiology and Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%