To evaluate the factors associated with knowledge and attitude of dentists regarding management of traumatic dental injuries (TDI). Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional and correlational study, the sample consisted of 136 Turkish dentists. A specialized questionnaire was developed and validated to collect data. The first part of the questionnaire included questions about sociodemographic characteristics, education level, working experince, working place, last dental trauma course, self-efficacy about management of TDI, and treatment frequency. The second part included a total of 17 questions with multiple choice and single correct answers regarding the management of intrusion and extrusion, avulsion, complicated crown fracture and crown-root fracture injuries in children. Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance, and partial eta squared coefficient (η 2) were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was a moderate level of knowledge among participants. The level of knowledge was statistically correlated (p < 0.05) in terms of working experience, working place, last dental trauma course and education level of participants, but not according to gender, self-efficacy, and treatment frequency (p > 0.05). General dentists had lower self-efficacy than specialist dentists (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While Turkish dentists working in a province seem to have a moderate level of knowledge regarding treatment of different types of TDI, it is necessary to carry out necessary studies to improve the knowledge and raise self-efficacy.

Background It is important to understand the interaction of various predictors with oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) to better design effective interventions to improve OHRQoL. Aim The aim of this study was to develop and validate a conceptual model evaluating the factors affecting the OHRQoL in children. Design The study group consisted of 754 parent‐child dyads. The data collection tools were a socio‐demographic data form, the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS), Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (C‐DAS), Children's Fear Survey Schedule‐Dental Subscale (CFSS‐DS), and an oral and dental health examination form. A conceptual model was developed to examine the factors affecting OHRQoL in children consisting of four endogenous and four exogenous variables. Path analysis was used to test the compatibility of the conceptual model. Results OHRQoL was associated with parental socio‐economic status (β = −0.12; P < .001), dental anxiety (β = −0.15; P < .001), and oral health behaviours (β = −0.13; P < .001). Although parental dental anxiety had the strongest direct effect on OHRQoL, children's oral health behaviours had the strongest indirect effect. Conclusions This study revealed a valid demonstrable path of association between parental socio‐economic status, dental anxiety, childhood dental anxiety, oral health behaviours, and OHRQoL.

Objectives To delineate the pathways between the parental and individual determinants of dental caries and dental visit behaviours among children, using path analysis. Methods The study employed an observational design; the study sample consisted of 583 parent‐child dyads. Data were collected using a sociodemographic and oral health behaviour form, the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire, the Corah Dental Anxiety Scale and the Children's Fear Survey Schedule‐Dental Subscale. A conceptual model was developed, and it consisted of four endogenous variables (dental caries, children's oral health, dental visit behaviours and children's dental anxiety) and four exogenous ones (parental socioeconomic status, parental dental anxiety, parental oral health behaviours and parenting style). Path analysis was used to test the compatibility of the conceptual model, with a statistical significance at P < .001. Results 49.1% of participants (n = 286) were male. The mean age of participants was 8.3 (SD = 2.1). The mean DMFT score was 6.0 (SD = 3.0) and the mean Frankl behaviour score 3.0 (SD = 1.0). Parental socioeconomic status showed the strongest association with dental caries (β = .276; P < .001), and children's dental anxiety had the strongest association with dental visit behaviours (β = −.414; P < .001). Parental socioeconomic status and oral health behaviours were directly associated with dental caries (P < .001), and parental socioeconomic status had the most association. Parenting style and parental and children's dental anxiety were associated with dental visit behaviours (P < .001). Further, while all parental variables except prior exposure to training about oral and dental health were significantly correlated with dental caries, only educational level and coverage by health insurance were significantly associated with Frankl behaviour scale score. Conclusions This study developed and validated a conceptual model that delineates the pathways between the parental and individual determinants of children's oral health and dental visit behaviours. The model should help us to understand these pathways to lower the incidence of dental caries and improve dental visit behaviours among children.

Objective:The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of double teeth, hypodontia, microdontia, and hyperdontia of primary teeth in Turkish children.Methods:The study group comprised 1149 children (554 girls, 595 boys). The children were examined in twelve local nurseries in Sivas, Turkiye. Clinical data were collected by four dentists according to Kreiborg criteria; which includes double teeth, hypodontia, microdontia, and supernumerary teeth. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the chi-square test.Results:Dental anomalies were found in 2.0% of children. The distribution of dental anomalies were significantly more frequent (P=.023) in boys (2.9%, n=17) than in girls (1.1%, n=6). In relation to anomaly frequencies at different ages, no difference was found (P = .760).Conclusion:Double teeth were the most frequently (1.3%) observed anomaly. The other anomalies followed as; 0.3% supernumerary teeth, 0.3% microdontia, 0.2% hypodontia. Identification of dental anomalies in the anterior region at an early age is of great importance for esthetic and orthodontic treatment planning.

This study suggests that the Turkish version of the IDAF-4C is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing dental anxiety and fear in Turkish children.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of virtual reality (VR) on dental anxiety, pain, and behaviour at different time points among children undergoing dental treatment under local anaesthesia. Material and Methods: This randomised, two-armed, within-subject, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial included 76 children. Eligible participants were treated in two dental visits using the following methods: with protective glasses only, without distraction (attention placebo-controlled -APC); and with the treatment condition (i.e., VR). Primary outcomes were dental anxiety and pain; secondary outcome was dental visit behaviour. Heart rate scores were recorded as an objective measure to evaluate dental anxiety and pain. Subjective measurements for each variable were also performed. Results: Significant reduction in dental pain and anxiety was observed in the VR group, according to the heart rate scores; however, no statistical differences were observed according to the self-reported measures. Decreased dental anxiety and pain were associated with the first visit sequence with VR. Dental pain and anxiety scores were lower during local anaesthesia in the VR group than in the APC group. Conclusion: Virtual reality significantly reduced pain and anxiety during local anaesthesia in children undergoing dental treatment; therefore, it may be recommended during dental treatment in school-age children.

No abstract

The results of this study indicate that there was no significant difference among DSs, general dentists and specialist dentists with respect to six conceptual categories that identify the conceptions about PDPs.