Objective: The aim of the study was to identify the profile of clinical research related to orthopedic disorders worldwide. Methods: A survey of clinical research in orthopedics was performed in the ClinicalTrials.gov platform and Plataforma Brasil databases. Results: According to data from the ClinicalTrials.gov platform, 1.142 clinical trials related to orthopedic disorders were registered from January 2017 to July 2022. Brazil is in the 14th position in the international ranking, and the Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP) occupies the 6th position among the collaborators who performed the most research in this area. The importance of the foot and ankle area in clinical research related to orthopedic disorders is evident when it is the 7th most studied worldwide and the 2nd most studied in Brazil. Most clinical trials related to orthopedic disorders worldwide target the adult or older adult population and involve interventional studies. On the other hand, most of the clinical trials related to orthopedic disorders in Brazil target the pediatric or geriatric population and involve observational studies. Conclusion: The profile of clinical research related to orthopedic disorders worldwide showed that most clinical trials targeted the adult or older adult population and aimed to treat patients, not prevent diseases. Brazil targeted the pediatric or geriatric population focusing on characterizing populations and diseases. Clinical research related to orthopedic disorders performed worldwide and in Brazil depended on sponsorship and private institutions. Level of Evidence IV; Descriptive Observational Study.
Objective: The aim of the study was to identify: how to fund clinical research in orthopedics and traumatology? Methods: A survey of funding for clinical research was performed. Results: According to data from the PIVOT® platform, the funding is concentrated in the USA, UK, and Medical Societies. The main sponsor was the DOD (USA), followed by the SICOT (Belgium). According to data from the DIMENSIONS® platform, there was a reduction of projects financed. The main country was the USA, followed by Japan. Regarding the amounts, the largest funders were the USA and Belgium. FAPESP (Brazil) is in the 7th position among sponsors. According to data from the InCites® platform, the main countries were the USA, China, and Japan. Conclusion: The reduction of projects in the last two years may be related to the limitations imposed by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Regarding the amounts, the largest funders were the USA and Belgium. This data confirms the importance of funding from the SICOT. The main sponsor was the DOD; this data may be related to injuries that occurred in the war. The fact that the NIDA (USA) is the third largest funder may be related to the increase in the consumption of opioids for pain management. The incidence of falls among the elderly may be associated with Japan being one of the countries most supporting this area. Brazil is in the 8th position, and CAPES, CNPq, and FAPESP are among the top 20 funders. Level of Evidence IV; Descriptive Observational Study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.