No abstract

Object The management of odontoid fractures remains controversial. Evidence-based methodology was used to review the published data on odontoid fracture management to determine the state of the current practices reported in the literature. Methods The Medline literature (1966–1999) was searched using the keywords “odontoid,” “odontoid fracture,” and “cervical fracture” and graded using a four-tiered system. Those articles meeting selection criteria were divided in an attempt to formulate practice guidelines and standards or options for each fracture type. Evidentiary tables were constructed by treatment type. Ninety-five articles were reviewed. Five articles for Type I, 16 for Type II, and 14 for Type III odontoid fractures met selection criteria. All studies reviewed contained Class III data (American Medical Association data classification). Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to establish a standard or guideline for odontoid fracture management. Given the extent of Class III evidence and outcomes reported on Type I and Type III fractures, a well-designed case-controlled study would appear to provide sufficient evidence to establish a practice guideline, suggesting that cervical immobilization for 6 to 8 weeks is appropriate management. In cases of Type II fracture, analysis of the Class III evidence suggests that both operative and nonoperative management remain treatment options. A randomized trial or serial case-controlled studies will be required to establish either a guideline or treatment standard for this fracture type.

Object Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine can be fraught with complications such as hardware failure. A cadaver study was performed to determine the biomechanical performance of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)–augmented pedicle screws. Methods Three osteoporotic human cadaveric specimens with a mean bone mineral density of 0.70 g/cm2 were used to evaluate the performance of a novel fenestrated bone tap in pedicle screw augmentation. On this device, tap threads serve a dual purpose in preventing backflow of cement toward neural elements while allowing for a custom form for subsequent screw placement. The tap was used to inject a mean volume of 3.7 ml PMMA/pedicle (range 2–8.0 ml PMMA/pedicle) followed by pedicle screw placement between L-5 and T-5, alternating between augmented and nonaugmented instrumentation. Axial pullout testing was then performed. Results Pedicle screw pullout strength was increased in both primary and salvage procedures by 119% (p = 0.001) and 162% (p = 0.01), respectively, after PMMA augmentation. Additionally, the injected cement volumes were divided into two groups, a low-cement group (≤ 2.8 ml/pedicle) and a high-cement group (≥ 5.5 ml/pedicle). Interestingly, the pullout strength did not significantly change with increased cement usage between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation results in a significant increase in the axial pullout strength of augmented pedicle screws in both primary and revision procedures. This technique may be a valuable adjunct in cases in which bolstering of the screw–bone interface is necessary.

Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation reduces the likelihood of pedicle screw loosening and pullout in patients with osteoporosis requiring instrumented arthrodesis.

In the Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial, neither systemic hypothermia nor supplemental protective drug affected short- or long-term neurologic outcomes of patients undergoing temporary clipping.

ESBR offers an excellent long-term option in preventing subsequent ICC with low perioperative complications. ESBR is robust with delayed (>2weeks) CSF leakage occurring in only 1.9% regardless of etiology. The presence of identifiable risk factors for ICC may guide the surgeon in determining the urgency of ESBR.

Numerous conditions affect the occipitocervical junction requiring treatment with occipitocervical fixation. In this paper the authors present their technique of craniocervical fixation achieved with the cephalad extension of posterior C1-3 polyaxial screw and rods to polyaxial screws placed in the occipital condyles. They retrospectively analyzed occipital condyle morphology obtained from CT analyses of 40 patients with normal cervical spines, evaluated occipital condyle screw placement feasibility in 4 cadavers, and provided a case report of a 70-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis, basilar invagination, and atlantoaxial instability who was treated with this novel technique. Based on radiographic analysis of occipital condyle anatomy, they concluded that on average a 3.5-mm-diameter x 20- to 30-mm-long screw can be safely placed at an angle of 20-33 degrees from the sagittal plane. Overall, measuring the condylar heights (mean [+/- SD] 10.8 +/- 1.5 mm, range 8.1-15.0 mm), widths (mean 11.1 +/- 1.4 mm, range 8.5-14.2 mm), lengths (20.3 +/- 2.1 mm, range 15.4-24.6 mm), and angles (mean 32.8 +/- 5.2 degrees , range 20.2-45.8 degrees) by using CT studies is an accurate and precise method. This finding correlates with the results of prior anatomical studies of occipital condyles and is important in the planning of craniovertebral junction surgery.

No abstract