The ubiquitous plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens attaches efficiently to plant tissues and abiotic surfaces and can form complex biofilms. A genetic screen for mutants unable to form biofilms on PVC identified disruptions in a homologue of the exoR gene. ExoR is a predicted periplasmic protein, originally identified in Sinorhizobium meliloti, but widely conserved among alphaproteobacteria. Disruptions in the A. tumefaciens exoR gene result in severely compromised attachment to abiotic surfaces under static and flow conditions, and to plant tissues. These mutants are hypermucoid due to elevated production of the exopolysaccharide succinoglycan, via derepression of the exo genes that direct succinoglycan synthesis. In addition, exoR mutants have lost flagellar motility, do not synthesize detectable flagellin and are diminished in flagellar gene expression. The attachment deficiency is, however, complex and not solely attributable to succinoglycan overproduction or motility disruption. A. tumefaciens ExoR can function independently of the ChvG–ChvI two component system, implicated in ExoR-dependent regulation in S. meliloti. Mutations that suppress the exoR motility defect suggest a branched regulatory pathway controlling succinoglycan synthesis, motility and biofilm formation.
Background The response to the anticoagulant drug warfarin is greatly affected by genetic polymorphisms in the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genes. Genotyping these polymorphisms has been shown to be important in reducing the time of the trial and error process for finding the maintenance dose of warfarin thus reducing the risk of adverse effects of the drug. Method We developed a real-time isothermal DNA amplification system for genotyping three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that influence warfarin response. For each SNP, real-time isothermal Helicase Dependent Amplification (HDA) reactions were performed to amplify a DNA fragment containing the SNP. Amplicons were detected by fluorescently labeled allele specific probes during real-time HDA amplification. Results Fifty clinical samples were analyzed by the HDA-based method, generating a total of 150 results. Of these, 148 were consistent between the HDA-based assays and a reference method. The two samples with unresolved HDA-based test results were repeated and found to be consistent with the reference method. Conclusion The HDA-based assays demonstrated a clinically acceptable performance for genotyping the VKORC1 -1639G>A SNP and two SNPs (430C>T and 1075A>C) for the CYP2C9 enzyme (CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3), all of which are relevant in warfarin pharmacogenentics.
Background: Postoperative pain management remains a challenge for clinicians due to unpredictable patient responses to opioid therapy. Some of this variability may result from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the human opioid mu-1 receptor (OPRM1) that modify receptor binding or signal transduction. The OPRM1 variant with the highest frequency is the A118G SNP. However, previous studies have produced inconsistent results regarding the clinical effects of A118G on opioid response. We hypothesized that measurement of serum opioid concentrations, in addition to determining total opioid consumption, may provide a more precise method of assessing the effects of A118G on analgesic response. The current study evaluated the relationship of analgesia, side effects, total hydrocodone consumption, quantitative serum hydrocodone and hydromorphone concentrations, and A118G SNP in postoperative patients following Cesarean section. Methods: 158 women scheduled for Cesarean section were enrolled prospectively in the study. The patients had bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for surgery and received intrathcal morphine with the spinal anesthetic or parenteral morphine for the first 24 hours after surgery. Thereafter, patients received hydrocodone/acetaminophen for postoperative pain control. On postoperative day 3, venous blood samples were obtained for OPRM1 A118G genotyping and serum opioid concentrations. Results: 131 (82.9%) of the subjects were homozygous for the 118A allele of OPRM1 (AA) and 27 (17.1%) carried the G allele (AG/GG). By regression analysis, pain relief was significantly associated with total hydrocodone dose in the AA group (P = 0.01), but not in the AG/GG group (P = 0.554). In contrast, there was no association between pain relief and serum hydrocodone concentration in either group. However, pain relief was significantly associated with serum hydromorphone concentration (a metabolite of hydrocodone) in the AA group (P = 0.004), but not in the AG/GG group (P = 0.724). Conversely, side effects were significantly higher (P < 0.04) in the AG/GG group (mean = 6.4) than in the AA group (mean = 4.4), regardless of adjustment for BMI, pain level, or total dose of hydrocodone. Conclusion: This study found a correlation between pain relief and total hydrocodone dose in patients homozygous for the 118A allele (AA) of the OPRM1 gene, but not in patients with the 118G allele (AG/GG). However, pain relief in 118A patients did not correlate with serum hydrocodone concentrations, but rather with serum hydromorphone levels, the active metabolite of hydrocodone. This suggests that pain relief with hydrocodone may be due primarily to hydromorphone. Although pain relief did not correlate with opioid dose in AG/GG patients, they had a higher incidence of opioid side effects. The correlations identified in this study may reflect the fact that serum opioid concentrations were measured directly, avoiding the inherent imprecision associated with relying solely on total opioid consumption as a determinant of opioid effectiveness. Thus, measurement of serum opioid concentrations is recommended when assessing the role of OPRM1 variants in pain relief. This study supports pharmacogenetic analysis of OPRM1 in conjunction with serum opioid concentrations when evaluating patient responses to opioid therapy. Key words: Cesarean section, female gender, genetic polymorphisms, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, opioid Mu 1 receptor, opioid concentrations, serum, OPRM1; rs1799971, postoperative pain
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.