The morphogenetic movements associated with the process of neurulation have been the subject of much investigation during the last one hundred years. A plethora of experimental evidence has been generated regarding the forces that drive this seemingly simple process, and many theories about the mechanics of the process have been proposed. Recent computer simulations have proved useful for evaluating these theories from a mechanical perspective. In this work, computer simulations are used to investigate several theories about the forces that drive neurulation. A simplified version of a formulation previously presented by the authors provides the mathematical foundation for these simulations. The simulations confirm that forces generated by circumferential microfilament bundles (CMB's) in conjunction with notochord forces can produce the rolling motions characteristic of amphibian neurulation. They also support the notion that redundancies exist in the systems of forces available to drive neurulation shape changes. The shape changes that occur following a variety of surgical and teratogenic interventions are also simulated. These simulations corroborate the role of circumferential microfilament bundles as a primary force generator.
There is a functional device in embryonic ectodermal cells that we propose causes them to differentiate into either neuroepithelial or epidermal tissue during the process called primary neural induction. We call this apparatus the "cell state splitter." Its main components are the apical microfilament ring and the coplanar apical mat of microtubules, which exert forces in opposite radial directions. We analyze the mechanical interaction between these cytoskeletal components and show that they are in an unstable mechanical equilibrium. The role of the cell state splitter is thus to create a mechanical instability corresponding to the embryonic state of "competence" in an otherwise mechanically stable cell. When the equilibrium of the cell state splitter is disturbed so as to produce a slight contraction of the apical end, apical contraction continues and the distinctive columnar neuroepithelial cells are produced. A slight expansion from the equilibrium state, on the other hand, results in flattened epidermal cells. The calculated forces are consistent with the known constitutive and force-generating properties and morphology of microfilaments and microtubules, and with free tubulin concentrations. There are no free parameters in the analysis. The first cells to assume the neuroepithelial state lie over the notochord. Propagation of the neuroepithelial state (homoiogenetic induction) then proceeds via stretch-induced constriction of the apical microfilament rings, until a hemisphere is covered, at which point the high rate of change of the meridional stress component necessary for further propagation vanishes. The remaining cells are stretched somewhat by this process and become epidermis. A sharp boundary between the tissues is thus formed (explaining "compartmentalization" and the binary nature of differentiation in general). Normal induction apparently involves setup of the cell state splitters in all of the ectoderm cells, perhaps synchronously timed by global embryo tension. The initial transition of cells from the ectodermal to the neuroepithelial state begins at the notoplate, where cell attachments to the notochord may both cause basal actin deposition and significantly reduce the stress induced in the ectoderm by the global tension, biasing the notoplate cell state splitters toward the neuroepithelial state. Introduction of an organizer or other solid substrate (artificial inducer) elsewhere, to which ectodermal cells can adhere, may likewise have both of these effects. Differentiation to either epidermis or neuroepithelium is thus a mechanical event followed by the synthesis of specific proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.