The accuracy of state-of-the-art global barotropic tide models is assessed using bottom pressure data, coastal tide gauges, satellite altimetry, various geodetic data on Antarctic ice shelves, and independent tracked satellite orbit perturbations. Tide models under review include empirical, purely hydrodynamic ("forward"), and assimilative dynamical, i.e., constrained by observations. Ten dominant tidal constituents in the diurnal, semidiurnal, and quarter-diurnal bands are considered. Since the last major model comparison project in 1997, models have improved markedly, especially in shallow-water regions and also in the deep ocean. The root-sum-square differences between tide observations and the best models for eight major constituents are approximately 0.9, 5.0, and 6.5 cm for pelagic, shelf, and coastal conditions, respectively. Large intermodel discrepancies occur in high latitudes, but testing in those regions is impeded by the paucity of high-quality in situ tide records. Long-wavelength components of models tested by analyzing satellite laser ranging measurements suggest that several models are comparably accurate for use in precise orbit determination, but analyses of GRACE intersatellite ranging data show that all models are still imperfect on basin and subbasin scales, especially near Antarctica. For the M 2 constituent, errors in purely hydrodynamic models are now almost comparable to the 1980-era Schwiderski empirical solution, indicating marked advancement in dynamical modeling. Assessing model accuracy using tidal currents remains problematic owing to uncertainties in in situ current meter estimates and the inability to isolate the barotropic mode. Velocity tests against both acoustic tomography and current meters do confirm that assimilative models perform better than purely hydrodynamic models.

No abstract

No abstract

O cean turbulence influences the transport of heat, freshwater, dissolved gases such as CO 2 , pollutants, and other tracers. It is central to understanding ocean energetics and reducing uncertainties in global circulation and simulations from climate models. The dissipation of turbulent energy in stratified water results in irreversible diapycnal (across density surfaces) mixing. Recent work has shown that the spatial and temporal inhomogeneity in diapycnal mixing may play a critical role in a variety of climate phenomena. Hence, a quantitative understanding of the physics that drive the distribution of diapycnal mixing in the ocean interior is fundamental to understanding the ocean's role in climate.Diapycnal mixing is very difficult to accurately parameterize in numerical ocean models for two reasons. The first one is due to the discrete representation of tracer advection in directions that are not perfectly aligned with isopycnals, which can result in numerically induced mixing from truncation errors that is larger than observed diapycnal mixing (Griffies et al. 2000;Ilıcak et al. 2012). The second reason is related to the intermittency of turbulence, which is generated by complex and chaotic motions that span a large space-time range. Furthermore, this mixing is driven by a wide range of processes with distinct governing physics that create a rich global geography [see MacKinnon et al. (2013c) for a review]. The difficulty is also related to the relatively sparse direct sampling of ocean mixing, whereby sophisticated ship-based measurements are generally required to accurately characterize ocean mixing processes. Nonetheless, we have sufficient evidence from theory, process models, laboratory experiments, and field measurements to conclude that away from ocean boundaries (atmosphere, ice, or the solid ocean bottom), diapycnal mixing is largely related to the breaking of internal gravity waves, which have a complex dynamical underpinning and associated geography. The study summarizes recent advances in our understanding of internal wave-driven turbulent mixing in the ocean interior and introduces new parameterizations for global climate ocean models and their climate impacts.

a b s t r a c tThis paper presents a five-year global simulation of HYCOM, the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model, that simultaneously resolves the eddying general circulation, barotropic tides, and baroclinic tides with 32 layers in the vertical direction and 1/12.5°(equatorial) horizontal grid spacing. A parameterized topographic wave drag is inserted into the model and tuned so that the surface tidal elevations are of comparable accuracy to those in optimally tuned forward tide models used in previous studies. The model captures 93% of the open-ocean sea-surface height variance of the eight largest tidal constituents, as recorded by a standard set of 102 pelagic tide gauges spread around the World Ocean. In order to minimize the impact of the wave drag on non-tidal motions, the model utilizes a running 25-h average to approximately separate tidal and non-tidal components of the near-bottom flow. In contrast to earlier high-resolution global baroclinic tide simulations, which utilized tidal forcing only, the simulation presented here has a horizontally non-uniform stratification, supported by the wind-and buoyancy forcing. The horizontally varying stratification affects the baroclinic tides in high latitudes to first order. The magnitude of the internal tide perturbations to sea surface elevation amplitude and phase in a large box surrounding Hawai'i is quite similar to that observed in satellite altimeter data, although the exact locations of peaks and troughs in the modeled perturbations differ from those in the observed perturbations.