Behavioral and electrophysiological studies of schizophrenia have consistently demonstrated impairments in the integration of visual features into unified perceptual representations. Specific brain regions involved in this dysfunction, however, remain to be clarified. This study used functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to examine the relative involvement of visual cortex areas (involved in form perception) and parietal and frontal regions (involved in attention), in the visual integration impairment in schizophrenia. Fourteen patients with schizophrenia and 14 healthy controls were compared on behavioral performance and data acquired via fMRI while completing a contour integration task that had previously been used to identify a visual integration deficit in schizophrenia. The schizophrenia patients demonstrated poorer visual integration than controls. Analyses of peak signal change indicated that while the groups were equivalent in area V1, the schizophrenia group demonstrated reduced signal in areas V2-V4, which are the earliest regions sensitive to global configurations of stimuli. Moreover, whereas the control group demonstrated greater recruitment of prefrontal and parietal areas during perception of integrated forms compared to random stimuli, the schizophrenia group demonstrated greater recruitment of frontal regions during perception of random stimuli. The two groups differed on brain regions involved in form perception even when they were matched on accuracy levels. The visual integration disturbance in schizophrenia involves both deficient basic visual processes (beginning as early as occipital region V2), as well as reduced feedback from visual attention regions that normally serves to amplify relevant visual representations relative to irrelevant information.

These data suggest that impairments in basic integration abilities may be compensated for by relatively increased activity in this region.

No abstract

fMRI research suggests that both the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) help individuals select better long-term monetary gains during intertemporal choice. Previous neuromodulation research has demonstrated that disruption of the DLPFC interferes with this ability. However, it is unclear whether the PPC performs a similarly important function during intertemporal choice, and whether the functions performed by either region impact choices involving losses. In the current study, we used low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine whether the PPC and DLPFC both normally facilitate selection of gains and losses with better long-term value than alternatives during intertemporal choice. We found that disruption of either region in the right hemisphere led to greater selection of both gains and losses that had better immediate, but worse long-term value than alternatives. This indicates that activity in both regions helps individuals optimize long-term value relative to immediate value in general, rather than being specific to choices involving gains. However, there were slightly different patterns of effects following disruption of the right PPC and right DLPFC, suggesting that each region may perform somewhat different functions that help optimize choice.

No abstract

Prior methods used to assess individual differences related to risk have not focused on an important component of risk management: how willing individuals are to pay for or take actions to insure what they already have. It is not clear whether this type of protective risk management taps into the same individual differences as does risk taking propensity measured by existing risk taking tasks. We developed a novel task to assess protective risk management, the Balloon Analog Insurance Task (BAIT), which is modeled after the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). In the BAIT, individuals are forced to decide how much money they are willing to pay in order to insure a specific fraction of their prior winnings given changing but imprecise levels of risk of monetary loss. Participants completed the BART and BAIT for real monetary rewards, and completed six self report questionnaires. The amount of insurance purchased on the BAIT was positively correlated with scores on the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale and on the Checking scale of the revised Obsessive Compulsive Inventory. Conversely, the amount of insurance purchased was negatively correlated with scores on the Domain Specific Risk Taking Questionnaire, and on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI). Furthermore, relationships between insurance purchased and these scales remained significant after controlling for the BART in linear regression analyses, and the BART was only a significant predictor for measures on one scale - the PPI. Our results reveal that behavior on the BAIT taps into a number of individual differences that are not related to behavior on another measure of risk taking. We propose that the BAIT may provide a useful complement to the BART in the assessment of risk management style.

No abstract

No abstract