Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) is a clonal tree species that commonly regenerates via root suckering after disturbance. This paper reviews the literature and identifies critical gaps in our understanding of the dynamics of aspen root suckering. The role of plant growth regulators (e.g., hormones, carbohydrates), environmental conditions (e.g., soil moisture, temperature, nutrient availability), overstory disturbance (e.g., harvesting, wildfire), ground disturbance (e.g., soil compaction, wounding or severing of roots), vegetation competition, predisturbance stand condition, and clonal (genetic) differences are discussed as they relate to sucker initiation, sucker growth, and (or) patterns of site establishment. The paper presents a series of conceptual figures summarizing our knowledge of the factors controlling suckering dynamics and identifies areas of future research.

Sudden dieback and deterioration of mature aspen stands is commonly observed throughout North America. This dieback process has tremendous ecological and economic importance, yet remains poorly understood. This paper summarizes our understanding of aspen dieback in North America, identifies potential processes that contribute to reduced vigour and dieback of aspen stands, and examines the scales (stand, ecosite, regional) at which these processes operate. Many factors including pathogens, nutrition, or successional changes may be involved in the decline of aspen vigour and thereby contribute to the dieback process. However, insect defoliation, drought, and thaw–freeze events appear to be the most likely factors initiating dieback in mature aspen stands. Further study is clearly needed to elucidate the mechanisms and landscape patterns of dieback. Information needs related to identifying processes and modeling landscape patterns of dieback are indicated.

The impacts of partial cut systems on nutrient availability and understory vegetation are poorly understood. To examine these responses, white spruce dominated stands in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta were clear-cut or partial-cut and the forest floor treated by slash burning, mixing, mounding, or scalping in a split-plot design. Soil nutrient availability (ion exchange resin), net N mineralization (in situ incubations), and vegetation (density and cover) responses were assessed. With the exception of higher Mg availability in the clearcuts, differences in nutrient availability were driven by forest floor disturbance and not harvest method. Relative to controls, burning increased availability of NH4+, NO3–, and P, and scalping increased Ca and Mg but diminished K. Controls had low levels of NO3–. The mixing treatment substantially reduced net N mineralization. In terms of vegetation, partial cuts reduced root suckering by Populus spp. (Populus tremuloides Michx., Populus balsamifera L.) relative to clearcuts. Burning and mounding stimulated fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium L.) cover, while scalping increased Populus spp. sucker density. In contrast, mixing largely reduced vegetation establishment, likely because of the destruction of roots and rhizomes and reduced N supply. Nutrient availability and vegetation establishment were more strongly controlled by forest floor disturbance than by partial canopy retention.

No abstract

In two separate studies, the suckering of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) roots was assessed in response to different daily maximum soil temperatures and in relation to available nutrients (CaSO4 and NH4NO3). In the first study, aspen root sections were incubated under high:low temperature regimes of 12:8, 14:8, 16:8, 18:8, or 20:8°C until 124 degree-days above 8°C had been reached. Daily maximum temperature did not affect the number of suckers produced per square centimetre of root surface area or per root section. However, more time was required to initiate suckers on root sections grown under the 12:8°C temperature regime compared with those grown at 20:8°C. Furthermore, when calculated from a base temperature of 5°C, the number of degree-days needed to initiate aspen suckers was not different across the temperature regimes. In the second study, CaSO4, NH4NO3, or distilled water was added to aspen root sections. While nutrients did not affect the number of suckers produced, the addition of CaSO4 or NH4NO3 significantly increased sucker dry mass. Nutrient addition appeared to stimulate sucker growth and mobilization of stored reserves to support this growth.