2002
DOI: 10.1139/x02-080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil nutrition and temperature as drivers of root suckering in trembling aspen

Abstract: In two separate studies, the suckering of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) roots was assessed in response to different daily maximum soil temperatures and in relation to available nutrients (CaSO4 and NH4NO3). In the first study, aspen root sections were incubated under high:low temperature regimes of 12:8, 14:8, 16:8, 18:8, or 20:8°C until 124 degree-days above 8°C had been reached. Daily maximum temperature did not affect the number of suckers produced per square centimetre of root surface area o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sprouting was fastest (15 days) at a soil temperature of 30°C and slowest (19 days) at 18°C. With P. tremuloides similar results of faster sprouting at high temperatures have also been found by Maini and Horton (1966), Schier (1973) andFraser et al (2002).…”
Section: Sprouting Ratesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Sprouting was fastest (15 days) at a soil temperature of 30°C and slowest (19 days) at 18°C. With P. tremuloides similar results of faster sprouting at high temperatures have also been found by Maini and Horton (1966), Schier (1973) andFraser et al (2002).…”
Section: Sprouting Ratesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Machine corridors always produced the highest sucker densities and tallest suckers while positions under the strip of retained aspen produced the lowest densities and shortest suckers. It is likely that at that scale, proximity to residual trees (aspen and understory spruce) suppressed aspen sucker regeneration and growth through apical dominance (Steneker 1974), shading (Huffman et al 1999, Brais et al 2004, reduced soil temperature as measured in GDD (Fraser et al 2002, Brais et al 2004, Landhäusser et al 2006 and increased competition for other resources (Canham et al 2004) influenced sucker regeneration and growth (Frey et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood and von Althen (1993) suggest that each additional year spruce are overtopped by aspen can have a substantial negative effect on their growth rate. More than one manual cutting treatment will almost certainly be required at that stand age, especially on productive sites where aspen suckers grow vigorously (Fraser et al 2002). The density and height of aspen suckers will, however, be tempered somewhat by the presence of surrounding aspen (e.g., Frey et al 2003;Prévost and Pothier 2003;Comeau, unpublished data).…”
Section: Tending Individual Sprucementioning
confidence: 99%