After arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair, image-guided PRP treatment on 2 occasions does not improve early tendon-bone healing or functional recovery.
Background:Preventing and mitigating the risk of reinjury after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rest on variables including age, surgical
restoration of knee stability, adequate physical function, and thorough and
complete postoperative rehabilitation, but to what degree these factors
influence return to sport is unclear.Purpose:To investigate factors predictive of return to sport 12 months after ACLR.
The factors specifically evaluated were strength, hop function,
self-reported knee function, patient age, and quality of postoperative
rehabilitation.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study evaluated 113 patients approximately 12 months after ACLR using a
rehabilitation grading tool, the subjective International Knee Documentation
Committee (IKDC) form, and a return-to-sport battery consisting of maximal
isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength and 4 functional hop tests.
Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square analyses were used to
determine differences between patients who had or had not returned to sport.
A subsequent binary logistic hierarchical regression determined the factors
predictive of a patient’s return to sport. In those patients who had
returned to sport, relationships between either age or level of
rehabilitation and passing the return-to-sport battery were also
investigated.Results:Complete rehabilitation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.95; P =
.009), age ≤25 years (adjusted OR, 3.84; P = .024), and
higher IKDC scores (P < .001) were predictive of return
to sport at 12 months. In participants who had returned to sport, 21% passed
the return-to-sport battery compared with only 5% who did not. Of those who
had returned to sport, 37% who underwent complete rehabilitation passed the
return-to-sport battery as opposed to 5% who underwent incomplete
rehabilitation. In patients aged ≤25 years, only 48% underwent complete
rehabilitation, despite having returned to sport. Additionally, in this
group of patients, 40% underwent complete rehabilitation and passed the
physical performance battery as opposed to only 4% who did not undergo
complete rehabilitation.Conclusion:Younger patients and higher subjective IKDC scores were predictive of return
to sport. Patients who completed 6 months of rehabilitation incorporating
jumping and agility tasks had a higher rate of return to sport, suggesting
that postoperative rehabilitation is important in predicting return to
sport. Specialists and physical therapists alike should stress the
importance of thorough postoperative rehabilitation and adequate
neuromuscular strength and function to patients whose goals are to return to
sport.
Background Rehabilitation contributes to post-operative success following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; however, randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are lacking. This study sought to determine if early, active mobilisation targeting the deltoid and the external rotator muscles, would exhibit greater improvements in post-operative outcomes compared to a delayed and deltoid-focused mobilisation programme. Methods Patients scheduled for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were randomly assigned to either an early active or delayed active rehabilitation group. Patient-reported outcomes for pain and function were assessed pre-surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Objective measures (Constant Score, range of motion, isometric strength) were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Results Sixty-one patients (63 shoulders) underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. There were no significant interaction effects or between-group differences for any patient-reported outcomes or objective measures at 3, 6 or 12 months post-surgery. However, significantly better ( p = 0.019) active arm flexion was observed in the early active group at three months post-surgery. Significantly more patients in the early active group reported improvement in patient-reported function that reached minimal clinically important difference from three to six months post-surgery ( p = 0.016). Conclusion Early, active rehabilitation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is safe and effective, and may have early clinical benefits over a conservative, delayed mobilisation programme. Level of evidence Therapy, level 1b. Trial registered 15 June 2016 at www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN12616000779471).
Background: Limb symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may be evaluated using maximal strength and hop tests, which are typically reported using Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) which may overestimate function.
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare the Back in Action (BIA) test battery to standard hop and muscle strength tests used to determine readiness to return to sport (RTS).
Study Design: Prospective cohort.Methods: Over two test sessions, 40 ACLR patients were assessed at a mean 11.3 months post-surgery. Initially, participants completed the 6 m timed hop and the single, triple and triple crossover hops for distance, and isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength assessment. The second session involved completion of the BIA battery, including stability tests, single and double leg countermovement jumps (CMJ), and plyometric, speedy jump, and quick feet tests. Pass rates for test batteries were statistically compared, including the BIA, a four-hop battery (≥90% LSI in every one of the four hop tests) and a combined 4-hop and strength battery (≥90% LSI in every one of the four hop tests, as well as ≥90% for both peak knee extensor and flexor strength). LSI differences between the four standard hop tests and the BIA single limb functional tests (the single limb CMJ and the speedy jump test) were evaluated.
Results:Significantly less participants passed the BIA battery (n=1, 2.5%), compared with the four-hop test battery (n=27, 67.5%) (p<0.001) and the four-hop test and isokinetic strength battery (n=17, 42.5%) (p<0.001). Collectively, LSI's for the standard hop tests were significantly higher than the BIA functional single limb tests (difference = 12.9%, 95% CI: 11.1% to 14.6%, p<0.001).
Conclusion:The BIA test battery appears to include some single limb functional tests that are more physically challenging than standard hop and isokinetic strength tests, highlighted by the significantly lower mean LSI's during the single limb BIA tests and the lower pass rate when employing the BIA protocol.
Level of Evidence:Level 4, case series.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.