PurposeTo assess the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 80 eyes with macular edema associated with BRVO. Patients received either 0.5 mg of ranibizumab (n = 24) or 1.25 mg of bevacizumab (n = 56) intravitreally. Both groups received three initial monthly injections followed by as-needed injections. The best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, mean number of injections, and retreatment rate were evaluated monthly for 6 months after the initial injection.ResultsThe best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.55 ± 0.26 at baseline to 0.24 ± 0.26 at 6 months in the ranibizumab group (p < 0.001) and from logMAR 0.58 ± 0.21 at baseline to 0.29 ± 0.25 at 6 months in the bevacizumab group (p < 0.001), which is not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.770). The mean reduction in central subfield thickness at 6 months was 236 ± 164 µm in the ranibizumab group (p < 0.001) and 219 ± 161 µm in the bevacizumab group (p < 0.001), which is not also a statistically significant difference (p = 0.698). The mean numbers of ranibizumab and bevacizumab injections were 3.25 ± 0.53 and 3.30 ± 0.53, respectively (p = 0.602). In addition, after the three initial monthly injections, the retreatment rates for ranibizumab and bevacizumab injections were 20.8% and 26.7%, respectively (p = 0.573).ConclusionsBoth ranibizumab and bevacizumab were effective for the treatment of BRVO and produced similar visual and anatomic outcomes. In addition, the mean number of injections and the retreatment rates were not significantly different between the groups.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of full-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) and half-fluence PDT in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Procedures: A retrospective review of CSC patients treated with full-fluence or half-fluence PDT for 12 months was performed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), neural retinal thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), and incidence of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy at 12, 24, and 36 months were assessed. Results: Thirty-seven and 30 eyes received full-fluence and half-fluence PDT, respectively. The BCVA and CMT improved significantly in both the full-fluence and half-fluence groups at 36 months, without a significant difference between the groups. Both groups showed significant reductions in SFCT with full-fluence (416.8–316.8 µm) being better overall than half-fluence (409.7–349.1 µm, p = 0.002). All patients achieved complete resolution without recurrence after one PDT treatment per eye. A few cases of RPE atrophy occurred, which could be correlated to PDT in both groups during the follow-up. Conclusion: Both treatments were effective and safe in chronic CSC, with significant improvements in anatomic and visual parameters, without recurrence of SRF.

Purpose: To report a case of combination therapy with interferon β1b (IFN-β1b) and mitomycin-C (MMC) for recurrent ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN).Case summary: A 72-year-old female presented with a white mass at the medial conjunctiva of the right eye. A gelatinous, nodular white lesion was observed near the medial limbus of the right eye. On histological examination, it was diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma in situ. A white nodule was found at the resection site 1 year after the resection. IFN-β1b (1 mIU/mL) and 0.02% MMC were administered daily with a diagnosis of recurrent OSSN. IFN-β1b was instilled four times a day for 1 month, while MMC was instilled four times a day for 4 weeks. After 1 month of the combination treatment, the lesion disappeared. MMC was stopped, while IFN-β1b was reduced to twice daily instillation, maintained for 1 month, and then stopped. On examination 12 months after discontinuation of the combination treatment, there were no recurrences or drug-related complications.Conclusions: Combination therapy with IFN-β1b and MMC for recurrent OSSN after surgical resection was relatively safe with no major complications.

Purpose:To report a case of conjunctival lithiasis with clinical manifestations of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis. Case summary: A 40-year-old male complained of pain, foreign body sensation and injection in the left eye lasting 1 month. The slit-lamp examination revealed injection of the superior bulbar conjunctiva, linear corneal band opacity, fine punctate staining and epithelial defect in the superior cornea area. After eversion of the left upper eyelid, there were many various-sized conjunctional concretions and inflammation in the superior tarsal conjunctiva. Therefore, we considered conjunctival lithiasis-induced clinical manifestations of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis and then removed the conjunctival concretions using a 30-gauge needle. After the procedures, artificial tears, antibiotic eye drops, steroid eye drops and a therapeutic contact lens were applied. After 1 week, all symptoms and signs improved and there was no recurrence for 4 months.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term effects of conventional corneal cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus.Methods: A total of 18 eyes of 9 patients diagnosed with keratoconus were analyzed retrospectively. One eye was diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and conventional corneal crosslinking was performed. The other eye was classified as non-progressive and remained untreated. All patients were assessed with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry (Kmean), corneal astigmatism, and corneal thickness. Clinical data were collected before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6 months and 1 to 10 years after the procedure.Results: The BCVA significantly improved from 0.63 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.46 ± 0.25 logMAR at 10 years after conventional corneal crosslinking (p = 0.027). The Kmax and Kmean decreased from 65.90 ± 9.43 D and 52.82 ± 5.16 D to 62.83 ± 8.16 D and 51.52 ± 5.18 D, respectively (p = 0.021, p = 0.028, respectively). Corneal astigmatism decreased from 6.97 ± 2.21 D to 5.53 ± 1.64 D (p = 0.008). The thinnest corneal thickness decreased from 435.11 ± 53.37 μm to 369.22 ± 64.00 μm 1 month after the procedure (p = 0.008), and gradually improved over time. At 10 years, the thinnest corneal thickness increased to 410.11 ± 61.32 μm (p = 0.097). In the untreated eyes, the mean keratometry significantly increased after 4 years of follow-up, but other factors did not change significantly. Although corneal opacity persisted for up to 10 years in 3 eyes of the treatment group, there was no significant difference of BCVA compared to the treated eyes without corneal opacity (p = 0.714).Conclusions: In patients with progressive keratoconus, conventional corneal crosslinking is a safe and effective procedure that suppresses long-term progression.