Prophylaxis for haemophilia improves outcomes, but at a substantial cost. Cost-utility analysis balances improvements seen in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) against costs, with the purpose of aiding healthcare decision-making. This analysis uses a measure of HRQoL known as utility. The objective of this study was to measure HRQoL (utility) values for states of health that result from on-demand therapy or prophylaxis. The HRQoL for different health states (including target joint bleeding, different intensities of prophylaxis, and indwelling intravenous catheters [ports]) was measured for healthy adults (n=30), parents of haemophilic children (n=30), and adults with haemophilia (n=28). Parents and patients rated health states similarly. Healthy adults gave the lowest ratings. The following rank, in order of HRQoL, was obtained: prophylaxis (low > medium > high) > on-demand therapy > prophylaxis with port> prophylaxis with infected port > on-demand therapy with development of a target joint. We conclude that: (1) haemophilia and its treatment reduce HRQoL; (2) prophylaxis is preferred to on-demand therapy; (3) intravenous ports substantially reduce HRQoL; (4) and an intravenous port to provide prophylaxis is preferable to on-demand therapy if a target joint develops.
Immune tolerance therapy (ITT) is currently the most effective approach to eradicate inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A. Limited evidence suggests that the use of plasma-derived factor VIII (pdFVIII) for ITT may be associated with a greater success rate than recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII). Analysis of ITT cases in Canada offered the opportunity to examine the success rate of using rFVIII for ITT, as rFVIII has been used almost exclusively for Canadian haemophilia A patients since 1994. The results of 32 patients from five haemophilia treatment centres were collated. Three patients continue on ITT. Of the 29 patients who completed ITT, 25 (86.2%) used rFVIII exclusively, and four used pdFVIII exclusively or pdFVIII followed by rFVIII. The initial FVIII dosing frequency was once per day in 72.4% of patients at an average dose of 98 U kg(-1) (range 50-200). Eight patients (25%) received one or more adjuvant therapies. The median duration of ITT was 1.1 years (mean 1.5 years, range 9 days to 6 years). The overall success rate of the 29 patients who completed ITT was 79.3% (23/29), which is comparable with the results of immune tolerance registries. Our results suggest that the success rate of ITT using rFVIII is not inferior to the results with pdFVIII.
In 1989, guidelines for the auditing of pediatric transfusion practices were developed by the Pediatric Hemotherapy Committee of the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) and made available to AABB members. A survey of members who requested the guidelines was conducted to determine how consistent the guidelines were with local transfusion practices and how useful they were for the conduct of audits. The majority of respondents indicated that the recommended audit criteria agreed with local practices and that most of them could be applied to their transfusion practice audits with little or no modification. An exception was that criteria for the transfusion of platelets to premature infants were considered by some to be too liberal. However, after review of the comments and the published information available, the committee elected not to revise the guidelines pertaining to platelet transfusions for premature infants. Bearing in mind that audit criteria are intended to identify circumstances in which transfusions are acceptable as reasonable therapy without need for further justification, rather than to serve as indications for transfusions, the AABB Pediatric Hemotherapy Committee guidelines for auditing pediatric transfusion practices are fairly representative of national practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.