There has been a growing concern about violence against women by intimate partners due to its incidence and severity. This type of violence is a severe problem that has taken the lives of thousands of women worldwide and is expected to continue in the future. A limited amount of research exclusively considers factors related only to these women’s deaths. Most focus on deaths of both men and women in an intimate partnership and do not provide precise results on the phenomenon under study. The necessity for an actual synthesis of factors linked solely to women’s deaths in heterosexual relationships is key to a comprehensive knowledge of that case. This could assist in identifying high-risk cases by professionals involving an interdisciplinary approach. The study’s objective is to systematically review the factors associated with these deaths. Twenty-four studies found inclusion criteria extracted from seven databases (Dialnet, Web of Science, Pubmed, Criminal Justice, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection, Academic Search Ultimate, and APA Psyarticles). The review was carried out under the PRISMA guidelines’ standards. The studies’ quality assessment complies with the MMAT guidelines. Findings revealed that there are specific factors of the aggressor, victim, partner’s relationship, and environment associated with women’s deaths. The results have implications for predicting and preventing women’s deaths, providing scientific knowledge applied to develop public action programs, guidelines, and reforms.

En el presente trabajo se detallanlos primeros resultados obtenidos sobrela relación entre determinados factoresestáticos y actitudinales y la percepciónde la responsabilidad por los hechoscometidos que muestran los agresoresde género condenados a una penaprivativa de libertad. Los factores estáticoscomprenden diferentes aspectos relativosa los hechos cometidos y la pena impuesta—gravedad, lugar de comisión, presenciade testigos, tipo de pena, condenaanterior por violencia de género— y losfactores de carácter actitudinal aparecenestructurados en tres dimensiones: cognitiva—sexismo ambivalente y pensamientosdistorsionados sobre la mujer y laviolencia—, emocional —dependencia yapoyo social— y autovalorativa (autoestima).Entre los resultados obtenidos destacala confirmación de asociación entre laatribución de responsabilidad y la presenciade testigos en el lugar de los hechos, asícomo entre la atribución de responsabilidady la actitud sexista por parte del agresor.El resto de relaciones analizadas resultandescartadas.

No abstract

The religious fraternities and brotherhoods of Seville, Spain, are among the major agents of the social aid carried out in that city. Knowing the characteristics of the servant leadership that have been established by authors such as Greenleaf (1997), we interviewed several representatives of these institutions to determine if they would meet those characteristics and to what extent they configure their teams in charge of carrying out that social aid. Our aim was to verify, through the Rivera and Santos questionnaire (2015), which has been modified to refer to a legal person, if the characteristics that have been assigned to the concept of leader-server and that normally apply to a natural person can also be identified in such corporations. Moreover, we sought to take the opportunity to investigate this structure of work in social action and identify the common characteristics, if any, that make the fraternities and brotherhoods of Seville different from other private agents fighting against poverty.

El estudio de los límites entre la libertad de expresión y los delitos de odio, cometidos como manifestación de intolerancia, es un tema de gran actualidad. Este trabajo trata de aproximarse al tratamiento jurídico penal español, para lo cual se analizan diversos estudios doctrinales y se toman en consideración documentos de distintos operadores jurídicos. Además de la necesaria pertenencia del sujeto pasivo a uno de los colectivos reconocidos como vulnerables, se examinan los distintos cauces de protección ofrecidos por el Código penal español. Sin embargo, la tendencia a una aplicación extensiva del Derecho penal por encima de otras ramas del ordenamiento jurídico, y la existencia de numerosas confusiones terminológicas, generan, además de una injusta pena de banquillo, la demanda de límites y contornos claros que permitan delimitar aquellas conductas intolerables de las amparadas por la libertad de expresión.