Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography predicted arrhythmic events independently of LVEF in this prospective, multicenter study of patients after MI. A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain may improve the selection of patients after MI for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, particularly in patients with LVEFs >35% who did not fulfill current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications.
Background
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an established method for evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography seems to be an important additive method for evaluation of LV function with improved reproducibility compared with LVEF. Our aim was to compare reproducibility of GLS and LVEF between an expert and trainee both as echocardiographic examiner and analyst.
Methods
Forty-seven patients with recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) underwent echocardiographic examination by both an expert echocardiographer and a trainee. Both echocardiographers, blinded for clinical data and each other’s findings, performed image analysis for evaluation of intra- and inter- observer variability. GLS was measured using speckle tracking echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson’s biplane method.
Results
The trainee measured a GLS of − 19.4% (±3.5%) and expert − 18.7% (±3.2%) with an Intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (0.74–0.95). LVEF by trainee was 50.3% (±8.2%) and by expert 53.6% (±8.6%), ICC coefficient was 0.63 (0.32–0.80). For GLS the systematic difference was 0.21% (− 4.58–2.64) vs. 4.08% (− 20.78–12.62) for LVEF.
Conclusion
GLS is a more reproducible method for evaluation of LV function than LVEF regardless of echocardiographic training.
On a segmental level, circumferential strain separated transmural from subendocardial necrosis better than longitudinal strain in the acute phase in patients with STEMI. Our findings suggest that in the acute phase in patients treated with thrombolysis, LV global peak systolic speckle strain should be the preferred method for predicting final LV infarct size.
Patients with NSTEMI due to acute coronary occlusions develop larger infarcts and more impaired left ventricular function than patients with NSTEMI without occlusions, regardless of infarct-related territory. Territorial circumferential strain by echocardiography enables very early identification of acute coronary occlusions in patients with NSTE-ACS and may be used for detection of patients requiring urgent revascularisation.
Background
The extent of cardiac dysfunction post‐COVID‐19 varies, and there is a lack of data on arrhythmic burden.
Methods and Results
This was a combined multicenter prospective cohort study and cross‐sectional case‐control study. Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography in patients with COVID‐19 3 to 4 months after hospital discharge was compared with matched controls. The 24‐hour ECGs were recorded in patients with COVID‐19. A total of 204 patients with COVID‐19 consented to participate (mean age, 58.5 years; 44% women), and 204 controls were included (mean age, 58.4 years; 44% women). Patients with COVID‐19 had worse right ventricle free wall longitudinal strain (adjusted estimated mean difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.6 to −0.5;
P
=0.005) and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (−0.10 cm; 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.05;
P
<0.001) and cardiac index (−0.26 L/min per m
2
; 95% CI, −0.40 to −0.12;
P
<0.001), but slightly better left ventricle global strain (−0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2–1.3;
P
=0.008) compared with controls. Reduced diastolic function was twice as common compared with controls (60 [30%] versus 29 [15%], respectively; odds ratio, 2.4;
P
=0.001). Having dyspnea or fatigue were not associated with cardiac function. Right ventricle free wall longitudinal strain was worse after intensive care treatment. Arrhythmias were found in 27% of the patients, mainly premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (18% and 5%, respectively).
Conclusions
At 3 months after hospital discharge with COVID‐19, right ventricular function was mildly impaired, and diastolic dysfunction was twice as common compared with controls. There was little evidence for an association between cardiac function and intensive care treatment, dyspnea, or fatigue. Ventricular arrhythmias were common, but the clinical importance is unknown.
Registration
URL:
http://clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique Identifier: NCT04535154.
Background-Infarct size is a strong predictor of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Acute reperfusion therapy limits infarct size and improves survival, but its use has been confined to patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular (LV) systolic function obtained before revascularization and final infarct size in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, as well as the ability of these parameters to identify patients with substantial infarction. Methods and Results-Sixty-one patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were examined by echocardiography immediately before revascularization, 2.1Ϯ0.6 days after hospitalization. LV systolic function was assessed by ejection fraction, wall motion score index, and circumferential, longitudinal, and radial strain in a 16-segment LV model. Global strain represents average segmental strain values. Infarct size was assessed after 9Ϯ3 months by late-enhancement MRI, as a percentage of total LV myocardial volume. A good correlation was found between infarct size and wall motion score index (rϭ0.74, PϽ0.001) and global longitudinal strain (rϭ0.68, PϽ0.001).Global longitudinal strain ϾϪ13.8% and wall motion score index Ͼ1.30 accurately identified patients with substantial infarction (Ն12% of myocardium, nϭ13; area under the receiver operator curve, 0.95 and 0.92, respectively).
Conclusions-Echocardiographic
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.