The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has yielded containment measures with detrimental effects on the physical and mental health of the general population. The impacts of lockdown on clinical features in Parkinson’s disease are not well known. We aimed to compare the physical activity, anxiety–depression levels between Parkinson’s disease patients and controls during lockdown. Forty-five Parkinson’s disease patients and 43 controls were evaluated with the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) via telephone interview. The patients’ disease-related symptoms were worsened during lockdown though regular Parkinson’s disease medication use. The PASE scores were low in both groups. The HADS scores of groups were below the cutoff point of anxiety–depression presence. Pandemic restrictions could lead to worsening of the motor and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease.
After 1 year migraineurs showed a slight but statistically significant deterioration: in postural sway especially, when measured with eyes closed standing on a foam surface with the head extended backwards; in reaction time; and in maximal excursion on the limits of the stability test; and perhaps in walk speed and step width on the tandem walk test.
Objective: To compare the balance and cognition of vestibular migraine (VM) patients with migraineurs without vertigo history and healthy subjects, and to examine the effects of disability level on these functions. Material-method:The study consisted of 32 VM patients, 32 migraineurs and 31 healthy subjects with similar sex and age. Balance functions were assessed with Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BEST), dizziness and headache severity with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), disability related to dizziness with Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), cognition with Stroop test.Results: There was no statistical significant difference among the three groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, marital status and education levels (p>0.05). Headache severity was higher in migraineurs than vestibular migraineurs and healthy subjects, also dizziness severity was higher in vestibular migraineurs than migraineurs and healthy subjects (p<0.0167). The outcomes of BEST 4, 5, 6 and BESTtotal were significantly impaired in VM patients than migraineurs and healthy subjects, and worse in migraineurs rather than healthy subjects (p<0.0167). Stroop effect of cognitive examination was worse in VM and migraine patients rather than healthy subjects (p<0.0167). There was no significantly difference between VM and migraineurs (p>0.0167). There was a negative correlation between Stroop effect and BEST-total in VM patients significantly (r=-0.509, p=0.003), and no significant correlation in migraineurs (p>0.05). Disability levels of VM patients were low in 38.7%, mild in 51.6% and severe in 9.7% related to DHI. There was no significant difference between balance and cognition function in terms of disability levels (p>0.05). Conclusion:The balance and cognition in VM patients and migraineurs were impaired rather than healthy subjects. The patient groups differed from each other in terms of vertiginous complaints rather than cognition. Solving the functional limitations with further longitudinal examinations can facilitate the treatment. The appropriate physiotherapy programs and patient education methods can be planned for these various issues.
The link between vertigo and anxiety is well known. The aim of this study is to compare anxiety disorders in 3 groups: patients with vestibular migraine (VM), patients with migraine but without vertigo (MO) and healthy controls (HC).We performed cross-sectional analysis of following tests: (a) Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA); (b) State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-X1 and STAI-X2); (c) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); (d) Panic-Agoraphobic Scale and (e) Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests were used for comparisons and least significant difference was used for further post-hoc analysis. There were 35 definite VM patients, 31 MO patients and 32 volunteer HC. There were no significant differences between three groups in age, total years of education or duration of headaches in VM and MO patients. On the other hand, vertigo severity was moderately and positively correlated with headache severity and with headache duration. There were significant differences in scores of HARS, BDI, PSWQ, and various PAS-R sub-scales between the three groups. Our study shows that VM patients are significantly more anxious and agoraphobic than MO patients and HC, displaying higher sensitivity to separation and being more prone to seeking medical reassurance.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of two different rehabilitation programs in acute central vestibulopathy secondary to posterior circulation stroke. METHOD: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 25 patients with posterior circulation stroke. Patients were instructed in routine balance and mobility exercises during the acute hospitalization period. At discharge, patients were assigned to either a rehabilitation or home exercise group. The home exercise group was instructed to perform the same exercise program provided in the course of hospitalization period. The rehabilitation group was randomized into the visual feedback posturography training or vestibular rehabilitation group. The balance and gait performance were assessed with clinical and objective measurements before and after 6 weeks of training. RESULTS: The balance and gait scores were significantly improved in both rehabilitation groups and in the home exercise group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of post-treatment values (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The improvements of balance and gait function in rehabilitation groups did not differ from the home exercise group. Rehabilitation programs were equally effective to improve the recovery in acute central vestibulopathy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.