During the current COVID-19 epidemic many outpatient chemical dependency treatment programs and clinics are decreasing the number of in-person patients contact. This has widened an already large gap between patients with substance use disorders (SUD) that need treatment and those that actually received treatment. For a disorder where group therapy is the mainstay treatment option for decades, social distancing, shelter in place and treatment discontinuation have created an urgent need for alternative approaches to addiction treatment. In an attempt to continue some care for patients in need, many a medical interventions have transitioned to a virtual environment in order to promote safe social distancing. Although there is ample evidence to support tele-medical interventions, these can be difficult to implement especially in SUD populations. This article reviews current literature for the use of tele/virtual interventions in the treatment of SUDs and offers recommendations on safe an effective implementation strategies based on the current literature.

Study Objectives Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) share some common features including prominent nightmares and sleep disturbances. We aimed to comparatively analyze REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) between patients with chronic PTSD with and without dream enactment behavior (DEB), isolated RBD (iRBD), and controls. Methods In this retrospective study, we comparatively analyzed 18 PTSD with DEB (PTSD+DEB), 18 PTSD without DEB, 15 iRBD, and 51 controls matched for age and sex. We reviewed medical records to determine PTSD clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA. We used non-parametric analyses to compare clinical and polysomnographic features. Results PTSD patients, both with and without DEB, had significantly higher RSWA than controls (all p < 0.025, excepting submentalis phasic duration in PTSD+DEB). Most RSWA measures were also higher in PTSD+DEB than in PTSD without DEB patients (all p <0.025). Conclusions PTSD patients have higher RSWA than controls, whether DEB is present or not, indicating that REM sleep atonia control is abnormal in chronic PTSD. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether neurodegenerative risk and disease markers similar to RBD might occur in PTSD patients.

Introduction “Spring forward,” the start of daylight savings time (DST) reduces sleep opportunity by an hour. The resulting sleep deprivation in healthcare workers can increase the potential for medical errors. We examined the change in patient safety-related adverse events (AEs) following the time change in both spring and fall. Methods Self-reported AEs that occurred 7 days prior to and following the spring and fall time changes for years 2010–2017 in a large healthcare organization were ascertained. AEs likely resulting from human errors were identified. The change in the number of AEs (all AEs or restricted to those resulting from human error) following the spring and fall time change were modeled using negative binomial mixed models using a random effect to correct for non-independent observations in consecutive. Results Over the 8 year period, there were more AEs (all and human) in the 7 days following the change in time both in spring (All: 2812 V. 2699; Human: 1902 V. 1625) and fall (All: 3207 V. 3007; Human: 2189 V. 2087). However, the only statistically significant increase was for the estimated 18% increase in human errors following time change in spring (95% CI: 6% to 34%; p = 0.004). The 18% AE increase in spring was also significantly greater than the 5% increase in AE in fall (p = 0.018). Conclusion There is a significant increase in human error related AEs following the “spring forward” clock change which can jeopardize patient safety. Based on safety considerations, DST might best be eliminated; alternatively, policy makers and healthcare organizations should evaluate measures to mitigate the increased risk during this period. Support NA

IntroductionCognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is effective at treating chronic insomnia, yet in-person CBT-I can often be challenging to access. Prior studies have used technology to bridge barriers but have been unable to extensively assess the impact of the digital therapeutic on real-world patient experience and multidimensional outcomes. Among patients with insomnia, our aim is to determine the impact of a prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) (PEAR-003b, FDA-authorised as Somryst; herein called PDT) that provides mobile-delivered CBT-I on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare utilisation.Methods and analysisWe are conducting a pragmatically designed, prospective, multicentre randomised controlled trial that leverages Hugo, a unique patient-centred health data-aggregating platform for data collection and patient follow-up from Hugo Health. A total of 100 participants with insomnia from two health centres will be enrolled onto the Hugo Health platform, provided with a linked Fitbit (Inspire 2) to track activity and then randomised 1:1 to receive (or not) the PDT for mobile-delivered CBT-I (Somryst). The primary outcome is a change in the insomnia severity index score from baseline to 9-week postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes include healthcare utilisation, health utility scores and clinical outcomes; change in sleep outcomes as measured with sleep diaries and a change in individual PROs including depressive symptoms, daytime sleepiness, health status, stress and anxiety. For those allocated to the PDT, we will also assess engagement with the PDT.Ethics and disseminationThe Institutional Review Boards at Yale University and the Mayo Clinic have approved the trial protocol. This trial will provide important data to patients, clinicians and policymakers about the impact of the PDT device delivering CBT-I on PROs, clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation. Findings will be disseminated to participants, presented at professional meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT04909229.

No abstract